Jump to content

Robin Hood and Air America


EvilMonkey

Recommended Posts

http://www.washingtontimes.com/op-ed/20050...81354-1414r.htm

 

Robin Hood and Air America

TODAY'S EDITORIAL

July 29, 2005

 

 

Did Al Franken's liberal radio network Air America divert city money for the elderly and inner-city children to itself? That's the question people should be asking this week after the revelation that the New York Department of Investigation is looking into whether hundreds of thousands of dollars were illegally transferred from a Bronx community center to Air America. Only a community paper and a few Internet bloggers seem interested in what could be an egregious case of illegal funneling of tax dollars to a private, partisan organization.

    In late June, city officials designated the Gloria Wise Boys and Girls Club, a nonprofit organization that runs mentoring programs for children and day care for Alzheimer's patients, a "non-responsible city contractor." Investigators found "significant inappropriate transactions and falsified documents that were submitted to various City agencies." The city subsequently suspended the club's contracts, which run well into the millions.

    It turns out, according to sources quoted anonymously by the Bronx News, that the mishandled money went to Air America. One source claims that $480,000 was wrongly transferred. The city investigation is concentrating on Charles Rosen, the club's president for 15 years, and Evan Cohen, the development director, who is a former chairman of Air America. Mr. Cohen resigned from Air America in May after the network's leasing plans in Chicago, San Francisco and elsewhere fell through.

    No one has claimed that Messrs. Cohen or Rosen sought to profit personally from any transfers. The money was said to have been a "loan" from the community center to Air America, which Air America would repay with interest at some point in the future. But why the public till should be tapped to rescue a foundering news outlet was a question no one seemed to consider. Maybe Air America officers thought spending public funds on their network was a truly compelling public interest. It isn't, of course, and if the allegations are true, they reveal a misuse of tax dollars to support a partisan organization.

    Air America's parent corporation Piquant LLC issued an "explanation" yesterday but did not deny the allegations. It instead tried to pin them on Air America's previous owners, on whose watch the transfer is said to have occured. That won't wash.

  Most of the mainstream newspapers have ignored this story. We only found out about it through the reporting of Brian Maloney, who pieced a story together on his blog "The Radio Equalizer" which was picked up by syndicated columnist Michelle Malkin. The New York Daily News buried an item at the end of a column of news briefs. There was nothing in the New York Times, which has heaped flattering coverage on the flailing network.

    Air America is struggling to find listeners, leaders and reliable funding. But should it take money from children and the ailing elderly? Al Franken and Randi Rhodes, ever the defenders of the "little guy," should explain this one.

   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(EvilMonkey @ Jul 30, 2005 -> 01:08 PM)

 

This is just one of the many usages of "corporate welfare" and I'm surprised the wider topic of corporate welfare hasn't come up in campaigns much (alright not really surprised since these same companies bankroll our damn candidates).

 

Often times much more than $480,000 goes to these companies (usually it is in the millions) -- all at taxpayer expense. But I'm sure that the Washington Times and Michelle "Corellation Does Not Equal Causation -- a swipe at her book on WWII Internment" Malkin are doing this in the interest of ending corporate welfare and not just to be a partisan hack

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(LowerCaseRepublican @ Jul 30, 2005 -> 07:42 PM)
This is just one of the many usages of "corporate welfare" and I'm surprised the wider topic of corporate welfare hasn't come up in campaigns much (alright not really surprised since these same companies bankroll our damn candidates).

 

Often times much more than $480,000 goes to these companies (usually it is in the millions) -- all at taxpayer expense.  But I'm sure that the Washington Times and Michelle "Corellation Does Not Equal Causation -- a swipe at her book on WWII Internment" Malkin are doing this in the interest of ending corporate welfare and not just to be a partisan hack

C'mon, LCR, this is different than the standard 'corporate welfare'. The group was given the money for an express purpose, then that GROUP turned around and gave it to Air America. If you had donated money to United Way, and it turns out that a director from United Way 'donated' some of the money to fund Focus on the Family, I think you would be a little pissed. Yes, in THIS case, the donor was the government, but the same principle applies. If Air America needed a loan that badly, why couldn't they go to John Kerry? He's loaded (or at least his WIFE is). Or any of the other millionaire liberals that are out there. (And yes, I know there are millionaires on both sides).

 

Oh, off topic, congrats on your second article.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...