![](https://www.soxtalk.com/forums/uploads/set_resources_7/84c1e40ea0e759e3f1505eb1788ddf3c_pattern.png)
SoCalChiSox
Members-
Posts
3,425 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
4
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by SoCalChiSox
-
the old Corbin Burnes thread, we have a new Burnes thread
SoCalChiSox replied to bmags's topic in Pale Hose Talk
Actually Madrigal Heuer Stiever Thompson would have been better than I thought (better from our perspective) , certainly you can see RHs reluctance there to give up Kelley which is good. MIL had to know there was no way we would agree to Crochet in place of Stiever. I dunno who the OFer we were targeting was but maybe they can just drop that part if it would help sweeten the original deal for MIL given Cespedes and also Colas may be on the way soon. -
the old Corbin Burnes thread, we have a new Burnes thread
SoCalChiSox replied to bmags's topic in Pale Hose Talk
Problem they already lost Q on the cheap while being strung along by MIL and now RH could get overriden again by JR and his boy, this time with truly catastrophic consequences. -
the old Corbin Burnes thread, we have a new Burnes thread
SoCalChiSox replied to bmags's topic in Pale Hose Talk
Or MIL is just trying to squeeze us for more at the last second by playing divide and conquer knowing the owner and manager have hijacked control from the FO and are willing to sacrifice the long term for the short term, so they figure they might as well try to benefit from that. -
the old Corbin Burnes thread, we have a new Burnes thread
SoCalChiSox replied to bmags's topic in Pale Hose Talk
Yeah I just saw the latest note from one of the foodies. From what I can tell, it seems they broke down and finally said OK to including Kelley thinking MIL would say OK but now MIL is trying to push for one of the big three as well and the FO is drawing the line there and saying no, so there's a standoff. -
the old Corbin Burnes thread, we have a new Burnes thread
SoCalChiSox replied to bmags's topic in Pale Hose Talk
Vaughn plus Madrigal, Heuer, Kelley would be absolutely horrendous. Just take Richards and keep all the talent. Vaughn should be totally off limits -
the old Corbin Burnes thread, we have a new Burnes thread
SoCalChiSox replied to bmags's topic in Pale Hose Talk
Yeah....Kelley hurts and so does Heuer but it seems Heuer was gone in one deal or another as they wanted to sell high. Madrigal going is certainly far more palatable than Vaughn/Kopech/Crochet and probably was a prerequisite to La Stella signing on the dotted line. Narvaez is meh....I actually would prefer giving Zack Collins a chance to back up Grandal and get 40 games in but TLR prolly wants a vet. -
the old Corbin Burnes thread, we have a new Burnes thread
SoCalChiSox replied to bmags's topic in Pale Hose Talk
Agreed or just keep them for the second part of the window. Just because JR is unwilling to pay money and both he and TLR have no incentive to care about the long term doesn't mean we deserve to have our window slashed in half. -
the old Corbin Burnes thread, we have a new Burnes thread
SoCalChiSox replied to bmags's topic in Pale Hose Talk
There was the suggestion (not by Jimmy but rather I think maybe Harold) that Kelley and Madrigal was not going to be enough and so there would be other headliners so I am really concerned about that. I get La Stella isn't gonna come if Madrigal is still there, but I'd say I wish they took Q at 1/8 because even Kelley is probably going to be a painful loss down the road. -
the old Corbin Burnes thread, we have a new Burnes thread
SoCalChiSox replied to bmags's topic in Pale Hose Talk
Jimmy, whats the damage? Whats the compensation going to MIL? Is Vaughn/Kopech involved? -
the old Corbin Burnes thread, we have a new Burnes thread
SoCalChiSox replied to bmags's topic in Pale Hose Talk
I will be royally pissed if Kopech is moved on this trade. Harold seemed to be implying he would. I sure hope not. Man Q was available for real cheap without destroying what is needed for the second part of the window. This is so dumb. Don't trade Kopech or Vaughn or Crochet -
the old Corbin Burnes thread, we have a new Burnes thread
SoCalChiSox replied to bmags's topic in Pale Hose Talk
You know if they want they could squeeze both Brantley and La Stella in there if they traded for Burnes. If Brantley really ends up having to settle for 2/24. Between that and say 1/7 for La Stella, if they only have to pay Burnes like 500k....thats 19.5 added, but if ReyLo is getting moved plus Madrigal, Heuer from the roster you can shave about 3m off of it (plus ofcourse prospects but there are no monetary savings there), that's 16.5 which is pretty damn close enough. -
the old Corbin Burnes thread, we have a new Burnes thread
SoCalChiSox replied to bmags's topic in Pale Hose Talk
What about 2B? -
the old Corbin Burnes thread, we have a new Burnes thread
SoCalChiSox replied to bmags's topic in Pale Hose Talk
How would that benefit MIL? I'm confused. -
the old Corbin Burnes thread, we have a new Burnes thread
SoCalChiSox replied to bmags's topic in Pale Hose Talk
Maybe we need to include a third team to send Madrigal too so they can send MIL something they want since they don't need 2B. I really don't want to give up Kopech or Vaughn. From C*shek's reaction something could very well be going down. -
the old Corbin Burnes thread, we have a new Burnes thread
SoCalChiSox replied to bmags's topic in Pale Hose Talk
Harold is saying it will take even more than Madrigal and Kelley. That already is alot. If he's suggesting Kopech or Vaughn too that would be horrific. -
the old Corbin Burnes thread, we have a new Burnes thread
SoCalChiSox replied to bmags's topic in Pale Hose Talk
This makes me very nervous because major assets would have to be going the other way and im worried about Kelley. -
Ahh i see....I bet he is waiting to see then whether Madrigal is moved in a trade.
-
Whats taking so long on the La Stella front? TLR is pushing hard for him so I thought they would have signed him by now.
-
This would be ideal but it seems unlikely La Stella would accept 5 and Q would accept 8. 7 and 10 is more likely which by itself would be 2m over budget and even that would not address backup C either assuming TLR is not a fan of Collins.
-
Jose Quintana...Signs with Angels (1YR 8M)
SoCalChiSox replied to ChiSoxFanMike's topic in Pale Hose Talk
Yes that would be ideal. I think they are trying to wait Q out right now to see if he accepts their price but if push comes to shove they may need to move ReyLo to get that 2m off the books to make the math work for both Q and La Stella. -
Jose Quintana...Signs with Angels (1YR 8M)
SoCalChiSox replied to ChiSoxFanMike's topic in Pale Hose Talk
I'd much rather take Q as a 4/5 rather than trade Kelley because the foodies are suggesting that right now thats whats holding up the trade route since other teams want him. We need to keep some good SP prospects for the second part of the window. -
That rules out resigning with MIN
-
Well the only alternative in our price range appears to be Richards. I'd prefer Q as a nice bounceback candidate. As a 4/5 he is perfectly good.
-
I'd be fine with Q.
-
And? We play righties 70%+ of the time and the rest of the lineup are lefty killers so we would be just fine against them even with Joc.