I can't believe how many people try to argue that the 3 batter rule limits what a manager can do so it is therefore bad.
Disagree with how it affects balance/flow/whatever all you want, but saying a rule shouldn't dictate strategy is one of the dumber things I've ever heard.
Again... the benefits of signing a guy early FAR outweigh the risk of paying someone 9 million dollars when they're worth 4.
(Anderson is also worth => 9 million.)
1. False
2. Fine, if he gets released (He won't), the extension he was given will not be prohibitive in anyway because of the structure of his options, which was my entire point.
The payoff on these kind of deals is absolutely massive vs. the risk. The risk is there and it's very real, but look at Anderson who is the closest one of the 4 deals of this type to being a 'bad' deal. his contract is basically a non-factor.