KipWellsFan

Kim Smith.

QUOTE(jackie hayes @ Jun 16, 2005 -> 07:32 PM) Even after the OBL tape? That plus everything else, I'm pretty convinced. Are you talking about where he makes a hand gesture about the buildings falling and having a chuckle? That's a good point but I'm sure many in that whole "death to America" crowd were quite happy, with their whole dancing on the streets thing. All the conspiracies are probably only that, but the opportunism that the Bush adminstration has shown after the attacks forces some to question 9/11, sadly, naturally.

QUOTE(NUKE_CLEVELAND @ Jun 16, 2005 -> 06:48 PM) and your side of things is stopping that from happening. It is YOU who deny these people a day in court not us. And it's all Clinton's fault for letting 9/11 happen I hope by 'your side of things' you only mean people against Guantanamo not liberal, because this has become a much more complex issue than that. And please explain how people against how Gitmo is run are delaying court procedures, I'm not following.

QUOTE(jackie hayes @ Jun 16, 2005 -> 07:15 PM) Is that at least the suggestion that you're floating, if not arguing? B/c that's what I take away from the conspiracy websites that discuss this Silverstein quote. And then what is your position on all this conspiracy garbage? Even if it's not really Dante, I like the "hottest places in hell" maxim. On 9/11 and the reaction, I side firmly w/ the Bush administration. As much as I would like to see the Bushies out of office, they did right here (at least in the immediate reaction). Theories like these sound like very crass attempts to cash in on 9/11 by the left -- by claiming that Bush actually conspired to murder thousands of people in order to pass something like the Patriot Act. It's disgusting and baseless and no more worthy of mention than any random Area 51 X Files fan post. A zero. I'd merely say it's a slight possibility that I won't completely dispel. There are obvious ways the Bush administration had earned criticism, ways that are in no way created through conspiracy theories. Also I think many believe it wasn't Bush or his administration but a group other than the over-hyped Al-Qaeda responsible for the 9/11 attacks.

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/sh...iews/khadr.html A Frontline was done on this man, and he was on the inside of Guantanamo and he doesn't seem to think that they're just a bunch of terrorists. view whole program online here http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/khadr/view/ But a warning, he's brown so he's probably not telling the truth. Oh and PBS did this report as an obvious attempt to harm the Bush Administration.

I'm not making an argument.

I'd suggest you stick with the default skin. I believe most users use that.

Highlight the text you desire to forward. Press control c, then in the window you're using to e-mail with press control v.

QUOTE(jackie hayes @ Jun 16, 2005 -> 12:04 PM) Link to a Popular Mechanics article analyzing a bunch of these...I don't know, I don't even think they qualify as "ideas". Basic conclusion, they're all crap, w/ much dishonesty used to spread the disinformation. But hey, what do specialists, scientists, and engineers really have on self fancying Clancy crazies, right? Good read but didn't even reply to this at all I guess they just think they never "pulled it" edit: also one of those pictures shows one of the towers coming down and it certainly wasn't coming straight down.

Canadian child killed in Cambodian hostage-taking. There may have been other hostages killed. But it's over now. http://www.cbc.ca/story/world/national/200...hool050616.html

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/wo...ack=1&cset=true

PBS Updates Editorial Standards http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/a...pbs_standards_2

http://www.cbc.ca/story/canada/national/20...pies050615.html I wish I knew something about China. They're a f***in' mystery.

conspiracy theory warning to those easily offended, don't read http://www.arcticbeacon.com/articles/artic...18131/27302.htm I'd love to know how Reynolds became a 'former' chief economist. much more at link, and endless information for both sides of the argument available all over the internet

http://www.cnn.com/2005/POLITICS/06/15/coo...n.ap/index.html what a joke

http://www.canada.com/national/nationalpos...f7-87e7611d5ffe more at link

here's the warning

QUOTE(EvilMonkey @ Jun 14, 2005 -> 03:58 PM) Read your own post. 99% of those CAPTURED fighting the US were Iraqui. Maybe that is because the foreign insurgents are big pussies that run away at the first sign of trouble. Or maybe they are killed instead of captured. Definitely possible explanations

http://washingtontimes.com/upi-breaking/20...02755-6408r.htm

QUOTE(Mplssoxfan @ Jun 14, 2005 -> 03:02 PM) Seriously, what would be the downside to voting yes? You might not get the support of some serious nut jobs, but who would they then support/ From my little bit of knowledge they didn't used to vote until Karl Rove got them involved.

Remember when Donovan Bailey owned Michael Johnson?

Someone should have told that idiot that life in our two countries isn't that much different.

www.drudgereport.com lol

http://www.cbc.ca/story/world/national/200...rash050613.html

Leaving everyone on the surface of the earth baffled.