KipWellsFan

QUOTE(southsider2k5 @ Jun 2, 2005 -> 05:50 PM) All that doesn't matter! Isn't that great. It doesn't matter who you are paying off, it doesn't affect your nuetrality.

What a joke.

An admitted non-neutral Washington Times accusing a group of not being neutral. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Washington_Times http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Insight_magazine

"John Kerry... reporting for duty" lol

QUOTE(winodj @ Jun 1, 2005 -> 02:37 PM) Ever watch that guy on CNBC? I think he's gonna pop an artery or have a cardiac every five minutes. I turned on MSNBC for a couple of minutes yesterday and that guy was on. That guy should be a WWE announcer.

He just said he thinks the Sox right now are a tribute to the work Jerry Reinsdorf has done for this team. Agree?

Lies and the Lying Liars that Tell Them by Al Franken

Fun little show I watched, definitely going to check out Season 2.

QUOTE(SoxFan1 @ May 31, 2005 -> 08:35 PM) Ahhhhhh.....useful information. Thanks! Just did a little reading on wikipedia and there are different theories as to the beginning of the word Mafia.

I'm not sure if I remember this correctly or if it's even true but I read somewhere that the Mafia originated in an anti-French group and that the word Mafia came from Muerte a la Franca.

I'm 99, haha aren't I funny.

Gossage

QUOTE(LowerCaseRepublican @ May 30, 2005 -> 11:07 AM) New System of a Down album Warren Zevon Killswitch Engage Jimmy Buffett How is the new SOAD album, I was obsessed with them for a while then lost interest?

QUOTE(NUKE_CLEVELAND @ May 30, 2005 -> 07:10 PM) Why do you waste your time reading what Michael Moore has to say. Everyone here from right all the way through the far left agrees that he is a dumbass blowhard. Giving him hits on his website and commenting on his latest drivel only encourages him. After doing a lot of reading about Fahrenheit 9/11 I've gotten pretty pissed off at Moore. While he doesn't lie to the extent of say Ann Coulter he has completely delegitimized any and all documentaries which are in any way left leaning or criticized the administration. If Moore really cared after F911 he would go and do a powerful documentary about Sudan or some s***hole in need of attention. I had some hope about his health care movie but then he announced a sequel to F911. He's more interested in money now. Right now his movies don't really do anything except piss of everybody, and he certainly has the talent to make a movie that will motivate and educate.

Looks like John Holmes

QUOTE(BobDylan @ May 30, 2005 -> 01:17 AM) They have a town called Balzers. Tell me that's not funny. And further north is Grabs, Sax and Bangs.

QUOTE(LowerCaseRepublican @ May 28, 2005 -> 10:50 AM) Conversely it shows that he, and I'm just playing Devil's advocate here, has a spine of Jell-O. They push polled in states insinuating that McCain had an illegitimate black child. For more info... From the web: http://www.stcynic.com/blog/archives/2004/...in_and_bush.php After McCain's surprising defeat of Bush in the New Hampshire primary in 2000, the Bush campaign targeted South Carolina, the next big primary, and began calling voters, particularly elderly voters, to ostensibly take a poll. But rather than asking how they felt about an issue, they asked this question: "Would you be more or less likely to vote for John McCain if you knew that he had fathered a bi-racial child?". Now, they didn't actually say that he DID father a bi-racial child. But at campaign stops, you could see McCain and his wife Cindy with their dark-skinned daughter, Bridget. They adopted Bridget from an orphanage in Bangladesh. This is how you play dirty politics, folks. You plant seeds that push buttons, all with plausible deniability. But it's vile as hell. It didn't stop there. They also put out "anonymous" pamphlets all over South Carolina telling people that McCain's wife had a history of drug addiction (she apparently was addicted to prescription pain killers at one point). Again, plausible deniability while spreading vicious rumors to kill one's political opponents. For a full report on the smear campaign, go here. Even worse is Bush's association with Ted Sampley, the absolutely loathsome former green beret and POW/MIA pimp who has claimed that John McCain is a traitor and even a communist spy that the Soviets had turned into a "Manchurian candidate". He's the same guy behind the attacks on John Kerry now, by the way. After what the Bush campaign did to McCain in 2000, you'd think that McCain would be pretty pissed off, wouldn't you? He said in 2000 that there was obviously no limit to how low Bush would go to win election after what they did to him, at one point even yelling at Bush when Bush grabbed his hand and telling him to "get your hands off me". But this is politics and McCain is now lending his image and endorsement to Bush in 2004. Why? Because it's his party and if he doesn't go along, he doesn't get party money and support when running for reelection to the senate. Again it is the political party "You will follow the party line, eh comrade?" dictating all the rules -- because if McCain calls shenanigans and actually voices his opinion of being pissed off about those slimeball tactics, he gets on the outs with the party & then will have a very difficult time in getting a Presidential nod. The whole monolithic concept of political parties seems to keep any deviation from the party line to compromise in check. There is no way for candidates to get approval for working together and actually getting things done that don't f*** over the American people because whatever they do -- they're bound to piss off the "Party faithful" which can be a problem come election time. Great role models :headshake

QUOTE(soxhawks @ May 29, 2005 -> 04:10 PM) if you can tell me where Liechtenstein is located i will care Europe

http://www.americanrhetoric.com/MovieSpeec...endenceday.html This sound file will change your life, take it from a recovering alcoholic.

QUOTE(Be Good @ May 28, 2005 -> 03:39 PM) No its not. More then half of the Hililary voters are going to vote for her because of Bill. For me that's one of the reasons. True, having one of the most well respected men on the face of the earth at your side isn't usually a bad thing.

QUOTE(Chisoxfn @ May 28, 2005 -> 12:17 AM) He was one of the directors I think. The movie was nothing like I expected, but that action scene against the guy in the white suit was totally badass and the story while different was good. I agree, Jet Li did a good job with that role (a much different role than he's used to). He was a producer. On an interesting note the movie's original title was Danny The Dog and the director's name is Louis Leterrier which translates to Louis The Terrier

QUOTE(Chisoxfn @ May 27, 2005 -> 11:59 PM) I saw unleashed tonight. Pretty solid had a few badass action scenes and Morgan Freeman is good in it as is Jet Li. I saw that one recently too. The action is good but nothing too spectacular. What I enjoyed was Jet Li playing a Rain Man like character. Interesting decision for him to take that part. 7/10 6/10 for Interpreter

QUOTE(ChiSoxyGirl @ May 27, 2005 -> 09:48 PM) I went and saw The Interpreter at the dollar theatre tonight. And, man, I wish I still had my dollar. I felt like the movie dragged on forever, and after one critical scene I turned to my friend and said, oh, so that means that blah, blah, blah. Thus ruining and spoiling the end of the movie. Anyway, it was predictable and Nicole Kidman seemed to think that if she spoke kind of huskily that would make the film more dramatic. And Sean Penn's character's side story was pointless. The whole film was crap and, honestly, I could have made it better by leaving a 1/3 of it on the cutting room floor. Two thumbs down. I just saw it as well, I wish I had spent only a dollar on it. All jokes aside I didn't think it was that bad. But certainly not very memorable, maybe worth another watch.

Heads up, he's about to be on Carson Daly I think

What!?! No John Cena!