KipWellsFan

I really think it would be great to receive any value for Koch. I also think New York may have some extra interest in Koch because he is a native of New York.

King George II of the United States is the Bush I was discussing. Bush and Co lied and people died. Every poll I saw said that the MAJORITY DISAPPROVED of going alone without UN approval. Why not take the conservative blinders off and check that. K thx. And pre-emptive wars of aggression are following Nazi doctrine. I'd rather not ascribe to that. And Cluj, who gave Saddam the gas that he used to kill his own civilians in 1988? The UNITED STATES. And how many countries condemned it when it happened? ZERO. Yeah, we should be reactive and allow things like 9/11 to take place. That makes much more sense. Wrong or right, I'd rather attack and be sure than sit back and wait and see. Call me selfish, but I value the life of my neighbor far more than someone 10,000 miles away. And I would like to see the poll that showed the majority of Americans voting no to the war if the UN isn't involved. Unless I'm going senile at the age of 22, I don't recall ever seeing 1. I'm not saying that preventative action wasn't the right decision but what exactly has the War in Iraq done to stop a future 9/11 like act from happening? In my proffessional opinion I would think that the U.S. forces, going into the land that many middle easterners love (Afhghanistan and Iraq) would be a virus infecting the middle east region with a case of rage against western interests. Almost could you say provoking more attacks?

If any of you have Kazaa and want a freaky UFO video seach under videos "best ufo caught on tape". It's description should say "I say gawdamn".

Most talented yes but all around best no.

What happened at the Homerun derby, it wasn't on TV here in Canada for the very firsy time. It was being held tonight correct?

I don't think it would be fair to call anyone that thought the searches were thorough or useful a fool. The truth is very few people actually know what went on over there during the searches and frankly I don't even know what to think of the searches either. I had seen and heard positive and negative reports on television, radio and internet on the searches effectiveness and haven't come to a conclusion on the searches. A fool maybe, but even more foolish are Blair and Bush for what is I guess you could say guaranteeing (for lack of a better term) the presence of WMD if finding them would be in fact like searching for a needle in a hay stack.

I LIKE BEING A TREE HUGGER!!!

I'm not sure if this really has anyything to do with it but the United Nations is severely under financed right now and has been severely restricted in their activities. And in fact more that half of the debt owed to the United Nations is owed by the United States. So in my opinion the Bush administration cannot place any of the blame for the WMD issue on the United Nations. I'd also like to add that the United Nations is far from being perfect and they have made some very poor decisions in the past.

My point is thought, that the United States would be a better country if a man like Howard Dean was president. Not only for America but for all the other countries of the world as well.

Well if Iraq keeps going at the pace it's going with more troops dying nearly every day and the whole thing about intelligence failures. The CIA, according to the Washington Post, cut the uranium from Africa stuff in October...so they are wondering how it made it into Bush's speech in January. More and more people are getting disgruntled about the Iraq war and how much money it is going to take to deal with that. If people start sifting through Bush's lies and bulls***, he'll be out in 2004 for sure. Kerry is going to run but he voted for the Iraq war. I wonder how he and Lieberman thought being more Republican than the Republicans would get them the Democratic ticket. I don't know why everyone is so surprised that this Iraq war is going the way it is. Did they expect us to go in and have 0 casualties. If you ask me, it's gone very well. When you consider that every solitary US death was analyzed ad nausium, it just seems a lot worse than it really is/was. And until we've been in there a while longer and give us more time to search for the supposed WMD, it's far too early to paint Bush as a liar. Sure, he's a liar because he's a politician, but it's too early to say he lied about all of the things he said about Iraq. Time will tell. And how many democrats voted "yes" to the Iraq war? Just curious. Well here's a page of Bush's lies so it wouldn't completely surprise me if he was lieing about WMD. Frankly I'm pretty sure he is. http://pearly-abraham.tripod.com/htmls/bushlies1.html This is only page 1 of the lies too! I want you to concede right now that if you followed ANY president's every word over the course of 3 years, you'd find just as many "lies". That's probably true, but I'm just trying to illustrate how it is quite fair to think that George W. Bush was lieing about WMD.

Well if Iraq keeps going at the pace it's going with more troops dying nearly every day and the whole thing about intelligence failures. The CIA, according to the Washington Post, cut the uranium from Africa stuff in October...so they are wondering how it made it into Bush's speech in January. More and more people are getting disgruntled about the Iraq war and how much money it is going to take to deal with that. If people start sifting through Bush's lies and bulls***, he'll be out in 2004 for sure. Kerry is going to run but he voted for the Iraq war. I wonder how he and Lieberman thought being more Republican than the Republicans would get them the Democratic ticket. I don't know why everyone is so surprised that this Iraq war is going the way it is. Did they expect us to go in and have 0 casualties. If you ask me, it's gone very well. When you consider that every solitary US death was analyzed ad nausium, it just seems a lot worse than it really is/was. And until we've been in there a while longer and give us more time to search for the supposed WMD, it's far too early to paint Bush as a liar. Sure, he's a liar because he's a politician, but it's too early to say he lied about all of the things he said about Iraq. Time will tell. And how many democrats voted "yes" to the Iraq war? Just curious. Well here's a page of Bush's lies so it wouldn't completely surprise me if he was lieing about WMD. Frankly I'm pretty sure he is. http://pearly-abraham.tripod.com/htmls/bushlies1.html This is only page 1 of the lies too!

Good luck to ya!

LOL, how many times are we going to have to have this argument.

Well what do you think of Dean, sideshow?

Who do you guys think would be the best to represent the Democratic Party? I side with Howard Dean. He seems to have great views. And I truly believe he could make the United States a better country.

this is what pops up when you search for weapons of mass destruction http://www.coxar.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/

Because it's funny...

Go to google.com and type in exactly "weapons of mass destruction", then click I'm feeling lucky.

Major league baseball seems very thin on catchers and if we have a few productive catchers in our system they could become very valuable. I like the idea of drafting lots of catchers. And besides, we really don't have many good catchers in our system.

I'd really like to see Joe Crede break out, he's got a great swing. I think it can be only so long before he goes on a tear.

I love those really baggy uniforms.

Why would the Yankees really want Koch, especially the way he's been pitching this year. Come on people Sell High buy Low

I like throwbacks. But the Chicago ones sure were boring.

:puke

HIYO!!!