KipWellsFan

QUOTE(southsider2k5 @ Sep 21, 2005 -> 10:35 AM) So when it is convient for your beliefs you believe and quote what they say? That might be the funniest thing I have seen. Man than you sure haven't seen many funny things.

"TOUCHDOWN!!" -Joey Cora

QUOTE(mreye @ Sep 21, 2005 -> 08:41 AM) And yet...oh man, I can't. It's just too easy. I'm dumb http://www.soxtalk.com/forums/index.php?sh...hl=o'reilly A previous thread where O'Reilly and Coulter admit within a day of each other that the media is not generally controlled by the left.

Why has soxtalk.com not made up Rally Crede shirts to make boat loads of money yet?

Just what is the liberal media, what makes them liberal? Is it that they are so obsessed with stopping global warming? Or legalizing pot or gay marriage? Do they have an anti-Southern State bias? Are they anti-religious? Are they owned and ran by pro-environment businesses? Are the anchors and or editors all Democrats? I just need a good explanation as to why you think it's so obvious that the media is generally liberal? Please try to give me an answer William, you're leaving me hanging!

QUOTE(WilliamTell @ Sep 20, 2005 -> 10:28 PM) I wasn't making fun of Canada if you thought I was. I was saying that I can understand why Canadians wouldn't like him and in another post I said he's popular in America, not like Canada as in I'm guessing he's not very popular in Canada. Sorry I didn't explain it better. We only have O'Reilly on a specialty channel, so you can imagine how liberal our media is.

QUOTE(Palehosefan @ Sep 20, 2005 -> 10:27 PM) Oh man, thats good humor. lol, you know what i mean!

QUOTE(WilliamTell @ Sep 20, 2005 -> 08:47 PM) You know as well as I do that there is a bigger liberal media. It's obvious Just what is the liberal media, what makes them liberal? Is it that they are so obsessed with stopping global warming? Or legalizing pot or gay marriage? Do they have an anti-Southern State bias? Are they anti-religious? Are they owned and ran by pro-environment businesses? Are the anchors and or editors all Democrats? I just need a good explanation as to why you think it's so obvious that the media is generally liberal? I didn't mean to mock you, sorry, but I get offended sometimes when people make comments about Canada. Oh and what do you actually think about the topic, don't you think it's unacceptable for someone in the "no spin zone" to lie? Finally, there are people that are popular like O'Reilly in Canada too. In Manitoba where we have a social democrat premier there's a right winger on the radio named Charles Adler I wouldn't be surprised if he gets the top ratings, people love listening to blowhards. p.s. O'Reilly gets the best ratings

QUOTE(Kalapse @ Sep 20, 2005 -> 06:55 PM) How didn't the site go down when Crede hit that HR? I thought for sure there would be an outage. People were too busy going for their kleenex to hit refresh.

I want the Rally Crede to bear my children.

QUOTE(WilliamTell @ Sep 20, 2005 -> 05:05 PM) I love watching O'Reilly but I could see why someone from Canada or France wouldn't like him. I'm gonna get me a "Boycott France" bumper sticker I think. Wouldn't like him? He's a lying asshole, it doesn't take a socialist to not like him, it takes someone with a conscience and curiousity. Umm excuse me, how do you know that?

QUOTE(southsider2k5 @ Sep 20, 2005 -> 04:56 PM) >Which all remarkably follow the biggest bubble economy bursting since 1929. I'm not so obsessed with the numbers but lying is lying, some conservatives should just stick to the argument "why does the government have a priority to help the poor before anyone else?", it's more honest and it makes more sense.

http://www.worldtribune.com/worldtribune/0...0680555557.html World Tribune calls it widespread corruption

I've seen O'Reilly twice use the idea that midway through Clinton's term poverty rate was at 13.7 percent but midway through Bush's term it was at 12.7 percent. So this proves that the Bush administration has been better on poverty than Clinton right? wrong! Cause O'Reilly, a master of spin himself fails to mention the facts: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/bob-cesca/so...g-f_b_7597.html Not only does O'Reilly get it completely wrong and misleads the American public but he calls Clinton's argument in favour of his system of reducing poverty "unbelievable propoganda". You know Bill, that term would be well suited to your Talking Point Memo on a regular basis. Then he insults Stephanopoulis as a member of the "elite media" whatever that means and calls him a "mummy" for not challenging Clinton on it. What an absolute clown. Please people when you watch O'Reilly who I admit can be interesting sometimes, question his logic and acknowledge that you are in fact stepping into a spin zone, not into a so-called no spin zone, which in today's world seems to be merely a mirage. read here for another lie about how the Bush Administration has increased tax revenues, it's done in the same manner as the spin on poverty rates. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/bob-cesca/so...g-f_b_7597.html My rant is complete.

QUOTE(Balta1701 @ Sep 19, 2005 -> 09:36 PM) Timo is on deck. Oh jeeze

QUOTE(SoxPhan7 @ Sep 19, 2005 -> 09:24 PM) is this the 1st post of the 101st page? lol, shut up

QUOTE(MinnySoxFan @ Sep 19, 2005 -> 09:22 PM) Am I the first post of the 100 page thread? no but maybe i am

QUOTE(winninguglyin83 @ Sep 19, 2005 -> 09:07 PM) mariotti probably going crazy in the press box. Sox suck. no they don't. yes they do. no, they don't. yes, they do. probably getting ready to charbroil ozzie

Anyone else having connection problems?

Nice move Oz

Man this is a great game of baseball.

QUOTE(fathom @ Sep 19, 2005 -> 08:51 PM) I'm convinced if you don't swing against Marte, he'll walk you every time. *cough* shut up *cough*

QUOTE(Balta1701 @ Sep 19, 2005 -> 08:50 PM) YAHTZEEE!!!!!!!!

QUOTE(qwerty @ Sep 19, 2005 -> 08:44 PM) So your saying an automatic run is better than allowing a man on base? That makes lots of sense to me. DJ's exaggerating obviously, but if even if you throw meat there's a chance for a meek fly out.

QUOTE(CYGarland @ Sep 19, 2005 -> 08:38 PM) Viz gets LUCKY!! It wasn't exactly a hangwuffem'