Jump to content

YourWhatHurts

Members
  • Posts

    1,406
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    5

Everything posted by YourWhatHurts

  1. Do you mean 1 year 22m on top of what he has or 2 years 15m per on top of what he has? Because the first number is already well above the QO and the second number isnt enticing enough to forego FA imo. I think we should offer 2/36 on top of what he has then so maybe its 3/44 and then we add another 1+m for 2021 as incentive if necessary.
  2. So we have him for 1 year at a rate probably 10m or so below his market value. He also supposedly had a down later portion of the year last year. We have some leverage if we want it. We can offer to rip up the current deal and offer say 3/45 or 3/50 or something less. I dont like the deal but I am thinking about justifying the price paid now. An extension helps justify the price paid.
  3. Dunning is a Major Leaguer even if hes a bit shy of losing prospect ranking status. The term "prospect" does not effectively describe the level of Dunnings development nor does it describe the much lower risk of failure in his case.
  4. One good season out of Dunning in Texas next year is going to shine the light of truth on what a huge turd of an overpay this was. We didnt even get a reliever back. At least it should have been Dunning + Weems + unimportant extra name for Lynn + solid RP
  5. I cant imagine Musgrove was too much more expensive. I would have rather paid a bit more for Musgrove and tried to extend him. No real interest in extending Lynn unless its a 1 or 2 year deal.
  6. What a Trumpian way of spinning 26 into a bad number, a full recovery from TJ into a medical red flag, a sinkerballers typical velocity into something low, and a first round draft pick into a toss in.
  7. Giolito Dunning and Lopez for Eaton looks a ton better than swapping Dunning for 1 year of Lynn
  8. If we need Lynn to pass the medicals then dont put him on a scale
  9. Yeah Dunning and change for Darvish and heyward would have been a ton better. What a shit turn of events. Maybe it really is 2020 and we are all really living in katy perrys bootyhole.
  10. Cringing waiting word on the damages... I am really confident ill dislike it or hate it...
  11. Im definitely one of the highest on Stiever. But its also because i think he has a high floor. Crochet is like insane ceiling but floor is RP. Its always good to have more of a floor guy involved pushing people. Stiever is a year away. Dunning is another high floor guy but hes ready now.
  12. I would rather sign a FA than trade for Lynn if we get Darvish. Giolito Darvish Keuchel Quintana Cease for 2020 and then Kopech Stiever and Crochet battling for 1-2 spots in ST 2021. Fuck yeah depth.
  13. Its also possible Pal is just fucking with us Also how many degrees of separation am i from katy perrys bootyhole? Please tell me.
  14. I like the defense and lineup balance a lot better with Heyward in RF and obviously the rotation looks a lot better with Darvish in it
  15. It has to be Darvish and Heyward both. Its all that makes sense.
  16. My guess is Dunning + Engel / Leury + Foster + ???? Maybe ??? Is something we care about or maybe not. I bet they can have Lopez if they want him and i bet they woukd take him. Maybe Dunning + Lopez + Engel + prospect.... My guess
  17. Probably. I thought he was a Yanks fan but a douche nonetheless. I think this is where the first reneging on a ban bet example came from. Started a trend maybe.
  18. Yeah i definitely dont like the idea of Bryant in RF I think Bryant is a great fit for the Nats. Im wondering if they would give up Robles (to us) in a Bryant deal where we give them a pitcher. They wont do Robles straight up fir Bryant. But if our staff thinks they can develop Robles then thats basically a lot like if Basabe wasnt a bust.
  19. Hey guys BTW dont you remember what this position the Rangers are in is like? We've lived through this a lit. You're not getting Kopechs or Giolitos from other teans unless you are giving up Sales Eatons and Quintanas on their deals. For short term control and flawed regulars, you dont get the moon. We know this already. Been there done that.
  20. Yeah but Joel Sherman is either clueless or he's just reporting whatever delusional ask the Rangers are making. The Rangers can have Domingo Santana the 3B and then one of their several back end starters plus a couple interesting lower minors types. They're not getting Frazier + Voit.
×
×
  • Create New...