Thanks - figured that was still the case, but wanted to see a more comparable case study myself (without having to go through the effort to Google it... who can be bothered with THAT s%*#?)
Just out of curiosity, do you happen to know if those aforementioned studies were done on broader-scope developments like The 78 (or projects like Truist Park)?
My point is that Colas has been so bad that, even if this guy is somehow “worse,” it’s really hard to have that production be meaningfully worse. Like, the difference between a .600 OPS and a .570 OPS from the corner is not really going to matter.
I should add… other teams are reaping the benefits of developments and neighborhoods centered around the ballpark.
The Sox have their parking lot revenue, thanks to Jerry’s 1970’s-modern economic model.
The economics of baseball have changed.
Guaranteed Rate would be a great ballpark in its current configuration in the ‘90’s. It’s still a good place to watch baseball.
Fact is that modern day ballparks are a full experience, and the inside of the ballpark is just one part of the experience. Say what you will about posters who lament the loss of tailgating possibilities like THAT is going to be the death knell for baseball on the South Side, but it is indicative of the way the modern fan “consumes” baseball.
It is this economic and competitive reality that is driving this “need.”
St. Jude Park?
Is it inappropriate to suggest that Reinsdorf will start resorting to sending nickels and return address stickers to all IL taxpayers to pay for the stadium?