mac9001

I think if he refuses to pitch in the playoffs if anyone has a grievance to file it's the team.

I really hope Taylor gets in a solid 85 innings next year. This was a bit of a punt year for him, but I look forward to see who moves faster next year between him and Smith.

Not exactly how you want to make a first impression on an elite arm over a few bucks. I wonder what the Sox would have done if they made a deal with Condon at like 9.4M? Throw $10k at a 5 yr sr for the comp pick?

They clearly paid them like they like them. But I wasn't particularly impressed with any of those picks. Odds on a 3-5rd picks having any meaningful impact on an MLB roster are slim anyway, so I probably should expect a lot. But I feel felt a lot better about our 3-5 round picks the last few years and except for Cannon I don't think they had to go over slot on many of those picks.

Not really seeing a lot of quality from day 2. But the Sox have been so poor with getting value from the draft it wouldn't take a lot to beat most of the last 10 drafts.

I can't imagine his trade value is any lower this off-season (bearing health). The key is obviously don't say yes to anything unless you feel you can't say no. I'm holding until the off-season unless I'm left speechless. I'm gonna be furious if my first reaction isn't "wow, they got that...".

Whatever Pallette has been doing in relief, he needs to do the same thing when he's starting

Given the complete lack of positional depth I would have assumed it could only improve after this draft but the sheer count of punted picks on relivers makes me feel like we've take a step back. I'm generally in favor of value over need, but if you don't draft enough quality bats you're not likely going to hit on many. This year it seems we either went for ceiling (1 big prep deal) or money saving floor moves (for org depth). Not really sold on 3-5 this year as legitimate prospects (at a minimum each guy drafted likely would still be around 1-2 rounds later). My hope for next year is a strategy that ends with as many high ceiling position prospects as possible. It seems we blew most of our spend on 1-2 and punted 3-10. My hope next year would be to land 6-7 legit-ish bats. Try to save money at 1-2 if it means getting more value 3-6. At this point we may need to just go for quantity and by that I mean 2-3 advanced college bats with legitimate tools vs one 1 high flying prep kid that's eating slot+ by leverage NIL deals.

Is it too early to guess how many picks we punt next year?

Seeing as half our first 10 picks will get $10k. That's not exactly a high bar to meet.

Bonemer's number is what scares me. I now get the feeling he took Shirley for everything he had. They seemed way to overly conservative on day 2 just to make a big play for day 3. Feels more like they were trying to dig out of a hole.

Short of a big singing tomorrow I don't see the value in 2A/B to offset the underwhelming 3-10 picks. I've felt pretty good about the last two years and even the senior signs had some interesting attributes. But just not seeing a lot to get excited about the entire day 2 result. This and next year's draft were key to adding some impact bats that would set a foundation for the rebuild and I'm left feeling very underwhelmed.

If they went significantly over slot on the prep kids it just looks like a really poor strategy. There were likely guys on the board you could have taken under slot and not punted the rest of day 2.

Hard to believe they had to go over slot on the two HS picks. Seems those guys went about where they expected or even a bit early. Doesn't seems like blowing potential savings on those two kids makes sense given that a lot of other prep or even collage options would take slot or less.

Love the upside on a kid like Dakota.

At #5 I honestly don't know why anyone would be upset with drafting an elite arm with front end potential. If you just hit on Smith and the odds are high we did, that's $25M you can spend on a position player. The Sox problem is they never seem to have a strategy to truly be competitive. You hit on a bunch of arms, build a great young staff, but you're still signing dudes to minor league deals to fill out the starting lineup. It's like they strive to be slightly less than mediocre and then just rinse and repeat.

Honestly, I wouldn't be shocked if Smith starts in AA next year and is really for the bigs mid season.

I feel like Smith's floor in starting in the bigs. Which I think I'd prefer over Cags floor which is hitting .150 with a 40% k-rate in AAA

If the Sox will never truly spend on SP I love picking Smith.

Offensivly absolutely, but I don't think there's a high probablity of him sticking at short. I do think Gonzales sticks as a leauge average defensive shortstop. Colson will probably eventually end up at thrid, he's just too big and a few more years in the weight room will end any chance of him sitcking at short.

His approach makes you think he's going to be a legit pro. Watching Colson this year has been very frustrating at times as he'll literally take 3 pitches straight down the plate without flinching. I'm not souring on Colson, but man do guys like Baldwin do everything and then some and they just don't get the respect they deserve.

If Schultz could throw a 100 pitches in an outing he'd be ready for the bigs right now. Ky Bush looks like he's ready for the bigs too

If the White Sox are truly going to be competitive anytime soon again they will need to draft some impact position players in the next two drafts. What's currently in the system does not put them on a path to legitimate contention.

This was my first time watching Cousin pitch but I was really surprised by the quality of his stuff. Fastball up to 96, and the slider was nasty (almost curveball like vertical drop). He looks like he can pitch in a MLB bullpen right now.

Burke with 6k in 2IP, fastball is averaging 96 (Max 98.5). ?