GreenSox
Members-
Posts
9,408 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by GreenSox
-
How accurate are framing measurements? Has all pitcher-bias been wringed out of them? Anyway, every team can see those framing ratings.so unless an interested team doesn't care about that, then he'll be sold at depressed value. At least wait and see how things function under the auto-zone..
-
What impresses me is that in 170 pro innings, Alberto has given up 2 home runs. TWO. Skubal gave up 18 in like 200 innings last year. Diaz gave up 4 in 66 innings.
-
I actually have an answer for that. ts and ys don't work on my personal laptop, so I have to copy and paste. I can' decide on which laptop to buy.
-
White Sox win draft lottery, will pick #1 in 2026
GreenSox replied to Buehrle>Wood's topic in Pale Hose Talk
If C Montgomery moves off of SS, try him in CF. He has that Robin yount look. Maybe a Spring look in 2027. -
Is Cowles really any different than Capra? Derek Hill? Mead? these guys, and others are all waiver-wire replaceable. Palette may not be the Sox cup of tea - fine. But they had plenty of room to protect him. On a side note, Mead has no power, does not walk, has a high K rate; is a poor defender and has no speed. What is a good/developed/top prospec version of Mead supposed to be able to do?
-
$1.5 about $340K over-slot.
-
I guess that article explains why he Sox didn't protect him: lack of extension. they are consistent on that attribute. So be it.
-
Mead, Cowles, Hudson, Hill et al and you don't protect Palette? Palette was a 2nd rounder only 3 years ago.
-
Winter Meetings Dec. Trades FA Signings Thread
GreenSox replied to caulfield12's topic in Pale Hose Talk
I don't it's so crazy. Dodgers had -.7 bWAR in LF last season. I could kind of see Benintendi giving max effort on a good team. -
2026 MLB Draft Thread...White Sox Control Draft/Roch the House
GreenSox replied to caulfield12's topic in FutureSox Board
Hurrah! Now get it right! -
Tampa - no. But I would like to see Vasil start.
-
White Sox acquire LHP Chris Murphy from BOS
GreenSox replied to Sleepy Harold's topic in Pale Hose Talk
He trades middle reliever Wilson and a 5th starter for 2 more org. guys; but when he trades for a middle reliever, he gives up prospects. These trades individually are low-stakes. But this stuff adds up. And he’s the one who should be trading for prospects. Instead, he gives prospects plus 40-man relief to these teams for little of value in return. At this point, he’s Boston and Tampa’s errand boy. -
FutureSox article on the Rule 5 40-man deadline
GreenSox replied to WestEddy's topic in FutureSox Board
The Marlins, of all teams, have pitching they had no room to protect? I'll go with the hitter from the Jays. -
Teel can hit and can play outfield. He's obviously the most valuable. To me Quero passed the eye test at catcher; he's 22. Lots of potential And I still like Lee as a backup. Don't trade any, unless it's for a premium (and a big premium for Teel).
-
“ And if something should happen to Vargas, they have Curtis Mead, who could take over at third.” What???? On what planet does Mead have an skills at all? Getz needs to stop trading for org guys. Especially from tampa.
-
In Fegan’s write up, he notes that Littel was traded for a “a pretty good prospect;” that prospect currently sits as Dodgers’ #13 per MLB.com. That trade occurred on 7/30 and Littel had a 2.4 WAR. The next day, the rays call their buddy Chris Getz and acquire 3.0bWAR Adian Houser for 3 org guys Is he at least aware that these other front offices, including his buddies from tampa, are schooling him like this?
-
Yea, Sox could use improvement in that area. Should be a priority especially with the lack of power.
-
They are contending so may not have room for an arm on the mend. The Sox have plenty of room. Lots.
-
LOL Yea, I'd have Mead off my list for that reason. Eisert, Boozer, Wilson...these guys need to have a)good seasons then b)traded in June or July. And not for guys who are going to be at the bottom of this list this time, next year.
-
Is Eisert a factor here? Your list looks accurate. I'd give consideration to protecting Coffee, McCullough, Schweitzer (in that order). None of those guys are that likely to get picked, but I'd hate to lose one in order to save several of the org. talents that they are protecting. Perhaps the better answer is to not protect any of them (including the org. guys) and leave some spots open for more flexibility for sign or trade
-
I am a bit surprised or curious about this. All of the Sox young players on the major league roster who actually have talent are infielders. And yet they keep the infield org guys like Mead around; and Cowles too, although I'm not sure what the theory of Cowles is. On the OF side, they have no one besides Baldwin once the current Sox starting OF (Benintendi, Tauchman, Robert) are moved.* Lee played some OF. Maybe some other guys will start shagging out there. Fletcher wasn't that bad anyway. The worst of the org bunch by a mile is Mead. *If those 3 aren't moved by July 31, then Getz darn well better be.
-
No reason to expose Elko, especially with as much filler as is on this 40 man. But then again, maybe so, because I think they need to do a lot more culling. I would say that Palette, 4-rounds Kelly, Dalquist, busts as starters, but not terrible as relievers should be protected over these guys. And then make a number of rule 5 picks.....the guys they ae kicking off the 40 man are org guys at this point, so they could get fortunate like last year.
