-
Posts
19,754 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
6
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by Soxbadger
-
Official 2008-2009 NBA Thread
Soxbadger replied to The Beast's topic in A and J's Olde Tyme Sports Pub
They just need to run a play where they go towards the basket instead of some fade away jumper. -
Official 2008-2009 NBA Thread
Soxbadger replied to The Beast's topic in A and J's Olde Tyme Sports Pub
Glad the Bulls took that time out. -
Official 2008-2009 NBA Thread
Soxbadger replied to The Beast's topic in A and J's Olde Tyme Sports Pub
The Bulls can not foul Pierce on this play. Preferably make Rondo or some one else not named Allen take the shot. -
Official 2008-2009 NBA Thread
Soxbadger replied to The Beast's topic in A and J's Olde Tyme Sports Pub
Do they dare run the Miller play again? This time hed only need to make 1... -
Official 2008-2009 NBA Thread
Soxbadger replied to The Beast's topic in A and J's Olde Tyme Sports Pub
WTF??? This is just crazy now. -
Official 2008-2009 NBA Thread
Soxbadger replied to The Beast's topic in A and J's Olde Tyme Sports Pub
Watching the Bulls is so frustrating. They need to put teams away when they get up not give away leads. Is it just me or do the fans seem unusually quiet? They need to be jacked so that the refs cant give the Celtics anything. -
Right now the biggest question I have is that: On one hand when Faraday met Desmond in the past, it was as if it was the first time ever happening for both Desmond and Faraday. Desmond remembered it as if it was a dream, but it appeared to be actually happening at that time so that the memory formed while he was asleep. On the other hand when Faraday met Elle it had already happened. Faraday had no recollection of it (obviously) but his mother already knew that it was going to happen. This is why Im leaning towards alternate time line theory. As there is currently no explanation for why the Desmond/Faraday encounter was not remembered the same way Elle remembered her encounter.
-
No they destroyed it. Daniel's first theory was based on the idea that "this was the first time it was happening to him, but he couldnt interefere/change the past because what was done was done." He started to believe that maybe he could change the past because it was really the present for him. He believed that it was the "present" for Jack, Kate etc and as such had never happened before. It turns out that at least Daniel had been to 1977 before, making the idea of "present" irrelevant. However time is constructed in Lost (and Im starting to believe its alternate time line theories) it is not the way that Daniel perceived it. Daniel did believe that they could die, but he believed that there death would be the first time it happened. He did not think that he had already died and was just going back in time to fulfill what had already happened. Time travel on shows is very difficult because every show has a different set of rules.
-
Perhaps his job was to tell Jack what to do. Some times when people finish their "job" for the Island, they then die. I felt the most interesting part of the episode is that they destroyed Daniel's "present day/time" theory in that what happened to Daniel had already happened. He felt that he was changing things, but in reality all of this had already happened.
-
Official 2008-2009 NBA Thread
Soxbadger replied to The Beast's topic in A and J's Olde Tyme Sports Pub
The biggest problem I have is that when you have the ball and 10 seconds you should run a play that is going to get you a good look. The Bulls used a play (earlier in the game) yesterday that would have been great in the final 10 seconds. You have Rose at the top of the arc with the ball, you have Gordon and a C or PF on one side of the court and the rest of the team on the other. The PF runs a screen for Gordon (Gordon moving away from the basket) and the screening player then attacks the basket. If the Defender overplays Gordon its an easy pass to the man driving, if they dont overplay Gordon gets a good look. Either way I just cant stand watching the same stupid isolation play over and over. -
Official 2008-2009 NBA Thread
Soxbadger replied to The Beast's topic in A and J's Olde Tyme Sports Pub
Im not sure you can blame the refs tonight when the Bulls have had plenty of chances. -
Official 2009-2010 NFL Thread
Soxbadger replied to rangercal's topic in A and J's Olde Tyme Sports Pub
Kiper gets paid to be controversial. No one watches tv to see: "Well this pick may be good we will have to wait 3-4 years to see what happens." Because in reality thats all you can say after every pick. If this was a science were there was a right way versus a wrong way 32 teams wouldnt pass on Montana, Brady, Terrell Davis, etc etc. So he gets paid to be controversial and to say that his rating is the best. Thats his job, and he gets paid for his opinion. -
Official 2009-2010 NFL Thread
Soxbadger replied to rangercal's topic in A and J's Olde Tyme Sports Pub
I also believe the Broncos traded their first rounder next year and not the pick they received from the Bears. -
Official 2008-2009 NBA Thread
Soxbadger replied to The Beast's topic in A and J's Olde Tyme Sports Pub
I know I just commented on Gordon taking the shot, but the difference was this time the Bulls needed a three. Other possessions they just needed any points. -
Official 2008-2009 NBA Thread
Soxbadger replied to The Beast's topic in A and J's Olde Tyme Sports Pub
What about Ben Gordon taking crazy shots at the end of periods instead of the ball being in Rose's hands. -
Official 2008-2009 NBA Thread
Soxbadger replied to The Beast's topic in A and J's Olde Tyme Sports Pub
Tyrus really screwed the Bulls by not giving the ball to Rose. -
Official 2009-2010 NFL Thread
Soxbadger replied to rangercal's topic in A and J's Olde Tyme Sports Pub
Bears get Knox too. -
Official 2009-2010 NFL Thread
Soxbadger replied to rangercal's topic in A and J's Olde Tyme Sports Pub
Well Melton appears to be a speed rusher, I also read that he played RB for Texas before becoming a DE. I guess we will see what Rod can do with this line. -
Official 2009-2010 NFL Thread
Soxbadger replied to rangercal's topic in A and J's Olde Tyme Sports Pub
Bears may have to draft a wr just because so many have been taken and then at 105 go with the other pick. It all depends on who they like the most out of guys like Louis Murphy, Iglesias and Knox. -
Official 2009-2010 NFL Thread
Soxbadger replied to rangercal's topic in A and J's Olde Tyme Sports Pub
Wow Giants take Barden 4 wr's taken in a row. -
Official 2009-2010 NFL Thread
Soxbadger replied to rangercal's topic in A and J's Olde Tyme Sports Pub
Williams fits in as a slot receiver and also a pr/kr. And 3 WR's selected in a row. Tate and Wallace. -
Official 2009-2010 NFL Thread
Soxbadger replied to rangercal's topic in A and J's Olde Tyme Sports Pub
We will see what the Bears do, but my guess is that he plays both DE/DT depending on the situation. If he can be solid at two positions thats a pretty good pick up in the third round. It seems that WR's are falling so Im glad they didnt reach just to fill a need. A lot of Wisconsin defensive players being drafted in this round, that has to be on measurables because they didnt play that great this year. -
Official 2009-2010 NFL Thread
Soxbadger replied to rangercal's topic in A and J's Olde Tyme Sports Pub
I think the Bears will use him at both DE and DT. On early downs he will rotate with DE's to help the run defense, on pass downs he will slide into DT to help with the pass rush. -
Official 2009-2010 NFL Thread
Soxbadger replied to rangercal's topic in A and J's Olde Tyme Sports Pub
Bears take Kipers BPA in Jarron Gilbert. 6'5 288 seems to be able to play both DE/DT. -
Official 2009-2010 NFL Thread
Soxbadger replied to rangercal's topic in A and J's Olde Tyme Sports Pub
For some reason I think the Bears are going WR and are going to chose between Derrick Williams (Penn State) and Iglesias (OK). Its hard to tell though neither of those guys are considered top players left, just top players left at WR.