-
Posts
20,336 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
2
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by southsideirish71
-
Back to the 1940s - Sox vs Twinkies 9-17
southsideirish71 replied to knightni's topic in 2005 Season in Review
QUOTE(fathom @ Sep 17, 2005 -> 11:47 AM) I still want to know if Santana is so amazing, how did the Indians beat him? they have a good offense, not a bunch of stiffs swinging for the fences. -
Back to the 1940s - Sox vs Twinkies 9-17
southsideirish71 replied to knightni's topic in 2005 Season in Review
bmac gets a k. What a shock, Good morning, good evening, good night. -
Back to the 1940s - Sox vs Twinkies 9-17
southsideirish71 replied to knightni's topic in 2005 Season in Review
At this point, Pull the starters and see what team B can do. This game is over. Put Anderson, Borchard, Gload in. See if one of them can do something. Anderson for Ozuna, Borchard for Dye, and Gload for Everett and the piano he is running with. -
Back to the 1940s - Sox vs Twinkies 9-17
southsideirish71 replied to knightni's topic in 2005 Season in Review
QUOTE(jphat007 @ Sep 17, 2005 -> 11:30 AM) Well if Bmac is starting the next game why is that a waste. Gives him time to get some work in today before he starts in 5 days. He should of started this game, but our fearless leader forgot the part in his bulls*** press conference when he got hired about playing the game the right way. If 100+ pitches through 3.2 innings giving up 4 runs giving up 8 or more hits is playing the game the right way, then he should of managed the f***ing royals. they play like that all the time. -
Back to the 1940s - Sox vs Twinkies 9-17
southsideirish71 replied to knightni's topic in 2005 Season in Review
QUOTE(Capn12 @ Sep 17, 2005 -> 11:27 AM) 3.2 IP, 8 H, 4 ER, 4 BB, 103 pitches What a f***ing joke. If he starts the next game, I will f***ing SCREAM. McCarthy gets the next inning. YEAH WE Waste McCarthy -
Back to the 1940s - Sox vs Twinkies 9-17
southsideirish71 replied to knightni's topic in 2005 Season in Review
For all those not able to watch the game. I have a capture from mlb.com tv of El Duque on the mound. -
Back to the 1940s - Sox vs Twinkies 9-17
southsideirish71 replied to knightni's topic in 2005 Season in Review
QUOTE(fathom @ Sep 17, 2005 -> 11:21 AM) What a f***ing joke. Duque better not start another f***ing game for the White Sox this season. Now we are going to waste McCarthy here. He should of f***ing started this game, but our fearless leader decided he needed to give a cookie to El Duque. -
Back to the 1940s - Sox vs Twinkies 9-17
southsideirish71 replied to knightni's topic in 2005 Season in Review
QUOTE(GoRowand33 @ Sep 17, 2005 -> 11:17 AM) wheres the optimism Common sense overwhelms the optimism. 4 zip twinks. A bad hitting team like Minny just beat the crap out of El Duque. -
Back to the 1940s - Sox vs Twinkies 9-17
southsideirish71 replied to knightni's topic in 2005 Season in Review
QUOTE(southsideirish71 @ Sep 17, 2005 -> 11:13 AM) How far will Morneau hit it. Well that was a great prediction. Another gopher ball give up by the 90 year old cuban. -
Back to the 1940s - Sox vs Twinkies 9-17
southsideirish71 replied to knightni's topic in 2005 Season in Review
How far will Morneau hit it. -
Back to the 1940s - Sox vs Twinkies 9-17
southsideirish71 replied to knightni's topic in 2005 Season in Review
Perfect game through 4. God our offense is so f***ing bad. This offseason they need to get higher OBP, line drive type guys. This long looping swing formula gets us the 200+ homers, but sucks when we face good pitching. All we do is K and look bad and barely scrape a few hits together. -
Back to the 1940s - Sox vs Twinkies 9-17
southsideirish71 replied to knightni's topic in 2005 Season in Review
QUOTE(fathom @ Sep 17, 2005 -> 11:08 AM) Garcia said he was fit to start last night. He was fit last start also. How did that work out for him. -
Back to the 1940s - Sox vs Twinkies 9-17
southsideirish71 replied to knightni's topic in 2005 Season in Review
QUOTE(Sox Hustler @ Sep 17, 2005 -> 11:02 AM) Is is just me or does Santana give the sox the biggest fits out of all the teams he faces? It's almost a no hitter for this f*** everytime against us. We have free swinging hitters with low OBP and high strikeout rates. Our long looping swings foul off pitches that should be hit into play, and completely miss the good pitches. We also dont shorten our swings up with 2 strikes at all no matter who we face. This is why crappy pitchers put up 5+ ks against this team. Its a formula for a no hitter. I am actually surprised he hasnt no hit us yet. -
Back to the 1940s - Sox vs Twinkies 9-17
southsideirish71 replied to knightni's topic in 2005 Season in Review
QUOTE(Balta1701 @ Sep 17, 2005 -> 10:58 AM) Hey, guys on our team...y'all see that? He bunted. He's on base. Wow! Pablo will pop up the bunt to the catcher. Thats how our execution has been lately. We got 2 hit last night by a Rookie last night. I am expecting a no hitter to go into the 7th inning for our team. -
Back to the 1940s - Sox vs Twinkies 9-17
southsideirish71 replied to knightni's topic in 2005 Season in Review
If the theory is swing as hard as you can so if you make contact you make hit the solo dong, then take Ozuna out and put in borchard. He at least has power. -
Back to the 1940s - Sox vs Twinkies 9-17
southsideirish71 replied to knightni's topic in 2005 Season in Review
QUOTE(Gene Honda Civic @ Sep 17, 2005 -> 10:40 AM) actually, Santana is prone to giving up Dingers... The best way to attack him may be to just Swing for the fences and hope for the best. Actually watching teams that have beaten Santana over the last few years. They try and hit the fastball the other way. This way when they get the change they dont pull it foul, and a lot of times the change winds up over the left field fence. -
Back to the 1940s - Sox vs Twinkies 9-17
southsideirish71 replied to knightni's topic in 2005 Season in Review
Maybe someone can get the new idea of shortening up the swing on two strikes to make contact. But f*** that, why would we do that, full long looping swing cuts today. 15ks for Santana 1 hit -
Back to the 1940s - Sox vs Twinkies 9-17
southsideirish71 replied to knightni's topic in 2005 Season in Review
The only ray of hope is that Minny's offense is in the same league as ours. -
Back to the 1940s - Sox vs Twinkies 9-17
southsideirish71 replied to knightni's topic in 2005 Season in Review
El Duque=shingo starting Slow effus pitches that get rocked around when they get behind the count. -
Back to the 1940s - Sox vs Twinkies 9-17
southsideirish71 replied to knightni's topic in 2005 Season in Review
QUOTE(Gene Honda Civic @ Sep 17, 2005 -> 10:25 AM) El duque has already thrown more pitches than Santana. And this shocks you. Santana will have less pitches by the 5th inning than El Duque has by the 3rd. -
AND THATS A WHITE SOX WINNER!!!!!!!!&#
southsideirish71 replied to NUKE_CLEVELAND's topic in Pale Hose Talk
JENKS = CLOSER -
Game Thread -- Friday, September 16th
southsideirish71 replied to CWSGuy406's topic in 2005 Season in Review
Bobby Jenks hits triple digits and gets the K. Jenks=Closer We need to get Bobby a leather vest -
Game Thread -- Friday, September 16th
southsideirish71 replied to CWSGuy406's topic in 2005 Season in Review
BASES LOADED NO ONE OUT AND WE GET ONLY ONE RUN. ONLY THE WORST OFFENSE IN BASEBALL CAN DO THIS SORT OF DUMB s***. THE ROYALS, THEY SCORE AT LEAST 2. THE TWINKS DITTO. THE CORPSEBALL KIDS s*** IN THEIR PANTS AND LEAVE THE BASES LOADED. -
Game Thread -- Friday, September 16th
southsideirish71 replied to CWSGuy406's topic in 2005 Season in Review
SOME WIERD s*** GOING ON HERE TONIGHT. -
Game Thread -- Friday, September 16th
southsideirish71 replied to CWSGuy406's topic in 2005 Season in Review
BASES LOADED NO OUTS. WE NEED A f***ING RUN SO BAD IT HURTS.