Jake

I'm shocked that they would part with Cespedes. Overrated, yes, but still the fourth highest WAR among position players on their team this year. Are they going to play Gomes every day in OAK?

The arm rating is based on whether baserunners get the expected amount of bases. So not running on Parra would prop up his arm rating just like throwing them out would.

Remember how religious non-profits get an exemption from the ACA contraception mandate? Due to society's interest in providing contraception, the government instead subsidizes these services if needed by an employee of an exempted organization. Until groups like Notre Dame sue the federal government saying they shouldn't have to sign the form that claims the exemption because that will ultimately lead to their employees getting contraception from someone else. Now the beef is that they get it at all. I suppose the next step will be freezing their paychecks because they could be used to purchase these services outright http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/the-next-hobby-lobby

I still give benefit of the doubt to the teacher to decide when difficult subjects should be taken on by students. One of literature's primary functions is as a means to grapple with the world, which unsurprisingly often means trying to reflect upon and understand the ugliness of the world. I haven't read Prince of Tides, but from what I know about its content I don't see anything overtly problematic outside of the fact it has never struck me as an especially "good" book. The "objectionable" portions of the content don't seem outside the realm of what can and should be encountered in a high school literature course. Rape, in particular, should be something that teenagers are exposed to in settings like this. Many women (estimates range from 1 in 6 to 1 in 4) will be raped in their lifetime. Young men should be exposed to discussions of it and depictions of it to understand what it really is before they might develop warped perceptions about what that means. Aside from specific subject matter, I think one of the valuable pedagogical moments for students of literature is to deal with works they don't like. Teach them to argue texts and, more specifically, to build arguments that go beyond simple evaluative judgments. Even better, get them to build compelling arguments in writing. I would expect the same from a parent as well. I'm not going to give them the Dikembe and just say "I'm the teacher nanana boo boo" but I'm going to expect a substantive argument about why I shouldn't teach [book]. If they haven't read it and haven't a single legitimate idea for an alternative that might achieve similar pedagogical goals, please come back when you have that information. An example in a non-literary setting from my time in college. I had a political philosophy of the economy course in which we read Atlas Shrugged. Does it mean the prof endorsed it? No. Does it mean the Koch brothers were underwriting the class? No. It's a text that you have to read and consider, then argue with soberly. While we may want to consider it beneath consideration, it clearly matters to a lot of people and therefore cannot be ignored. I'd make the same argument for the Bible, a translated Qu'ran, and various literary and other cultural texts. That they are widely consumed means they are worthy of study.

I hope we don't respond to Mitchell's first strong run of play ever by once again moving him up too fast

The absolute maximum I could imagine us giving up money-wise is $5M per future season owed to Danks...and that would be an unprecedented amount for us. Of course, we've very rarely had payroll commitments so far underneath our ability before

Hey man, I love some Crazy Bread and/or Italian Cheese Bread from Little Caesar's

QUOTE (fathom @ Jul 30, 2014 -> 07:42 PM) Davidson now at least 3 for his last 38 with no homers. Hard to get excited about a prospect that has hit under .200 in 3 out of 4 months this year. Luckily, our current third baseman is hitting like a superstar and we have several MIF prospects doing very well. Lots of time (like, years) for Davidson to get things worked out without any noticeable damage to the big league club.

QUOTE (fathom @ Jul 30, 2014 -> 07:00 PM) Noesi is not afraid of a big inning. He's been a pleasant surprise, but I will be disappointed if he is in the rotation next year I hope he pitches well enough to be in it. He's been very solid this year and overall has been remarkably good for a guy who hadn't worked out as a starter in a very long time before he got here. Will be interesting to see what Sox think of him considering that big factor - that he's without the proper physical prep for a season-long workload as a starter. As far as today goes, the delay of the game is probably related to the outcome. He's had several times where it seems like he has reached the mound ill-prepared for the game. It only figures that he'd get mindf***ed by the rain delay. Hopefully he bounces back strongly for the next one.

People are trying their best to say things that make it sound like more than fluff. Not just "he looks good," but he looks amazing and better than before and his game is going to the next level yada yada

There's no way the Indians would have made him a QO anyway.

How many tools do you want a first baseman to have? 2 will cut it for me and I'm interested in which one the respondent thinks Wilkins has. The book used to be that he had a very good hit tool but lacked power, but suddenly that power looks very much present (and the standards for power around MLB have dropped).

Whenever a decision made by Robin backfires, it's wrong. When a decision that goes right may have defied logic...still wrong! Boom. Robin = always wrong, no matter what

I find it doubtful that the Marlins would want any portion of Danks's contract

QUOTE (greg775 @ Jul 30, 2014 -> 01:54 AM) LOL. Why "please no?" He's not a bad righty. Probably cost 13 mill a year though for 3-4 years. Free agent contracts to in-demand starting pitchers are among the worst investments one can make

QUOTE (Jose Abreu @ Jul 29, 2014 -> 11:22 PM) I can see us signing James Shields this offseason Please no

Dunn can hit. All Beckham can do is turn double plays. He doesn't he do other defensive things well. The one thing that Beckham has over the likes of Barney is the fact that he is actually more talented. Some teams might perceive some value in just rolling the dice. The problem is that Hahn can't look someone in the eye and say we aren't going to no-tender him. Everyone would like to roll the dice with Gordo, but why pay for it when you can wait until he's released?

QUOTE (fathom @ Jul 29, 2014 -> 10:59 PM) If/when the Sox let Beckham go, none of us should be mad at the organization if he goes elsewhere and succeeds. The Sox have given him every possible chance to prove he's MLB starting caliber. Who knows, he might go to a team like Toronto next year and his 25 home runs based on their power hitting approach. If so, good for him...no regrets about going in another direction with Semien, Sanchez or Johnson. For the record, I said this same thing when he was hitting .350. The White Sox have seen enough and if you can get rid of him, you do it. Maybe hold on to him for the rest of the year to see what happens, and certainly trade him if there's an opportunity, but the Sox can't be held responsible for anything good he does elsewhere.

He better not steal the triple crown from Abreu /rampant homerism

Ideally we won't bat the rookies that high in the order until they hit their way there. This is particularly true when you want to insert a lefty that struggles against lefties (Micah) right after or before another lefty (Eaton, who doesn't struggle against lefties luckily enough).

Re: walks, those don't have to be at the expense of the hits. He looks to be doing a better job of recognizing when he's being pitched around, though, which is key. I think he'll walk an adequate amount ultimately.

My position was to unload Keppinger and find Gillaspie platoon at-bats around the field by forcing him to learn a corner OF position and trying him at 2B as well.

The safeguard that Google put into place is they alert you if an extension asks for new permissions. The malware extensions came from the Chrome app store. It's a tough situation because they don't vet extensions like Mozilla does (Mozilla's system has its own drawbacks, most notably slower updates).

QUOTE (Soxbadger @ Jul 29, 2014 -> 11:41 AM) I think another fair idea would be that you only get a pick that that is equal to the slot value you offered. So if you offer $3mil, you get a pick in next years draft that was slotted for $3mil. So that way if the Astros want to play around, its their loss. Too anti-team. The idea is that you lower your offer because of injury. You can't be compelled to offer damaged goods full slot value

QUOTE (Y2HH @ Jul 29, 2014 -> 07:54 AM) A few things... Firefox actually uses less memory than Chrome does, it just appears to use more because it lumps all of it's memory usage into one process. If you add up all the processes of Chrome, with the same websites open and the same extensions running (if any), you'll see Chrome uses slightly more memory in both cases (with or without extensions), however, it's advantageous to split the processes and sandbox them as Chrome does. Opera is Chrome, so you may as well just use the real thing -- Opera dumped their own proprietary engine and started using Google's Blink engine, which is a fork of Webkit2, so ... essentially Opera offers nothing not in Chrome, since it's running on Chrome's codebase. Out of the box, Chrome is the most secure browser there is, however, if you want to go through the hassle of using Firefox + NoScript, that would easily make FF the most secure. A few things for you, too... If you are getting malware, it's not Chrome's fault, it's yours. Stop browsing untrustworthy websites. And if you refuse to do that, download Adblock Plus (and add in the Malware domains list), it will protect you from that issue. For Firefox users, use Adblock Edge. As stated above Opera is Chrome, so there is no point in using it anymore. I know about Chrome's sandboxing. What I was saying is that the base memory usage is lower in Chrome vs. Firefox because I've tested it. For instance, browsing with just one or two tabs open is consistently lower in memory usage. That said, I use lots and lots of tabs so Firefox works out for me due to lower memory usage and just better overall responsiveness. What they're saying about malware is something that has been going on a lot with Chrome lately. Semi-popular extensions will get bought out by malware peddlers and start injecting ads. So it isn't sites or poor browsing habits that are getting these people in trouble, it's once trustworthy extensions. Things as seemingly harmless as an RSS feed subscribe button were turning into ad injection plugins.