
Jake
Members-
Posts
19,286 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by Jake
-
QUOTE (KyYlE23 @ Apr 23, 2014 -> 08:53 AM) I swear sometimes it seems like you cover your eyes when Boozer plays and only see the points he scores. It's just that his usage makes no sense. If he actually sucks, then he shouldn't be starting and playing 70% of the first three quarters. If he is good enough to merit the playing time in the first three quarters, then he should get more than 0 minutes in the final quarter/8 minutes of the game
-
Always sucks to lose your job right after hitting a game-winning grand slam. He was on the way out regardless, but it still stinks. It's like seeing your sub come to the scorer's table in basketball and proceeding to rain down 3's before the next stoppage
-
Need some input as I don't really keep up with the car market. Looking for something in the $13k-$17k range. Looking used, but probably 2011 or newer. I'll be moving on from a Pontiac Grand Prix and would like something similar in terms of size/form factor. I could go smaller, but not compact. I would love to go hybrid if feasible. I've looked at some Toyota Corollas, Kia Optima, Chevy Malibu if that works as a starting point. The truth is I just don't know the offerings very well in this (or any) category. Probably won't go VW/Mini/Fiat/brands that aren't easy to get serviced at any old place. Not asking anyone to do the research for me, but I am curious if any models or model years come to mind given my general parameters.
-
QUOTE (Feeky Magee @ Apr 23, 2014 -> 07:29 AM) What's new about Flowers's approach? He's walking and striking out pretty much exactly the same amount as he was last year. Flowers has mentioned altering his swing path in such a way that he can hit more singles
-
QUOTE (Rowand44 @ Apr 22, 2014 -> 11:42 PM) Ya I'm not going to get mad at Taj, we get blown out with out him today. It's not so much that I'm mad at him that we need to scheme/coach in such a way that it doesn't keep happening. It seems ridiculous that Boozer can get a ton of minutes in quarters 1-3 and cannot play in the fourth quarter, the quarter in which we constantly lose games due to our inability to score.
-
QUOTE (danman31 @ Apr 22, 2014 -> 11:39 PM) I'd rather keep watching this group than watch Melo bring this team down to the ground. I wouldn't mind taking a spin down Melo lane at this point. Throw Melo on this team, no Rose, I think you have a legit title contender
-
Lost in the Hinrich hatefest is how Taj torpedoed several key possessions by going into 1-on-1 mode and throwing up crap shots. He doesn't have the skill for that.
-
Thibs is still a great coach and I would lean towards perhaps the best in the league. But he f***ed this one up.
-
Everyone talking about Ariza shutting down DJ. This would be no problem if you didn't have f***ing KIRK HINRICH on the floor as well, making it so that there is no mismatch created by the Wizards' 3 guarding our 1
-
Hinrich = Darin Erstad
-
That is Thibodeau's fault. Kirk Hinrich had no business getting all those minutes late. Keeping Dunleavy out while leaving Kirk out there is unforgivable. More generally, Boozer can't play 0 minutes in the fourth quarter every game. If nothing else, you have to get a breather for the other bigs.
-
Also, there is no way we should go 8 minutes scoreless and not ever have Boozer on the floor
-
Thibs. WTF, leave Kirk in and take out Taj?
-
QUOTE (witesoxfan @ Apr 22, 2014 -> 10:26 PM) I like that pick, and you're right, he's having an absolutely phenomenal year thus far. If nothing else, the Sox middle infield depth is looking really solid right now. The Phegley of 2014
-
LMAO that they didn't call that for Taj when the previous play was a foul against Jo
-
So many bad calls late in this game
-
1. Get Hinrich out. 2. Holy s*** does Taj have a knack for doing 1000 spins and throwing up a crap shot on big offensive possessions
-
The guy was like the Adam Dunn of LOOGYs, consistency-wise.
-
People freaking out over who our "zero notice or chance to shuffle rotation" starter is
-
It's pretty clear that Leesman should be our LOOGY, not a starter. Not sure what happened to his velo though. Averaged 90.5 on his heater in MLB last year
-
That Spurs team has an old Duncan, aging Parker, a good-not-great Kawhi Leonard, and a bunch of roleplayers. It is no small accomplishment that they are the number 1 seed in the West. Switch the coaches and that team has no business winning more games than OKC, Westbrook or not.
-
QUOTE (RockRaines @ Apr 22, 2014 -> 03:47 PM) Where did you get PRP done and what type of doctor recommended it? Was recommended by a PT/ATC and orthopedist. Administered by a pain management specialist (best with needles, I suppose). Got it done at a orthopedics facility that serves a D1 program, AAA affiliate of an MLB team, and an NBA squad. I actually sat in the waiting room with someone who I later found out was a MiLB pitcher.
-
QUOTE (ptatc @ Apr 22, 2014 -> 02:58 PM) Yes, they do it for all soft tissue injuries. So it could be used for either a muscle or UCL injury. However, as stated they should have a good idea if the UCL is involved and so far they say no. The key is to build up the strength and proprioception of the flexor muscles so that when he comes back, there is excessive stress on the UCL so it doesn't tear. Good points. I suppose my statement was based on the possibility that if they suspected a UCL tear, they wouldn't say anything. I spent a lot more time than a week (over a month I believe) on the shelf when I had a PRP FWIW, but that was also 1. shoulder and 2. in the offseason.
-
QUOTE (ptatc @ Apr 22, 2014 -> 01:52 PM) They should know already about the UCL. I'm more worried about using the PRP with the muscle. If they did use it, it generally implies greater damage than inflammation. Doesn't PRP sound like something you might do with a UCL tear that you're not sure requires surgery (of course, it seems like they're always not sure, but then always need surgery)
-
QUOTE (ptatc @ Apr 22, 2014 -> 01:52 PM) They should know already about the UCL. I'm more worried about using the PRP with the muscle. If they did use it, it generally implies greater damage than inflammation. Doesn't PRP sound like something you might do with a UCL tear that you're not sure requires surgery (of course, it seems like they're always not sure, but then always need surgery)