Jump to content

Jake

Members
  • Posts

    19,216
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Jake

  1. Superb outing for Reynaldo. I hope we can get him some cushion to let him push deeper into the game if he lets a guy or two on.
  2. Can't believe a team with a guy like Rougned Odor would have a bad attitude
  3. Umpire has been giving Minor that high and outside pitch. Very tough to hit.
  4. Two old men talking about the re-runs they've been watching on TV
  5. "How do you solve problems? With solutions!" sounds like the beginning of a bad sales pitch
  6. Interesting to me that virtually all of Leury's bad defensive plays have come in LF
  7. 6 swings and misses in 29 pitches for Lopez. That might be more swings and misses than he generated in his entire previous start.
  8. I think there's an analogy to pitchers who can throw strikes and not hit spots. Tim is getting better at identifying strikes from non-strikes, I think, but he's not doing a good job identifying good pitches to hit from non-good pitches to hit. Hopefully he's just in a bit of a funk where his decision-making is a little out of whack.
  9. Minor really moving the ball around effectively. Nobody has been able to get a very clean swing on him.
  10. We'll have a good idea of what Palka is by then, that's for sure.
  11. I know exactly which pitch you're talking about and I thought the same thing.
  12. I'll take this opportunity to re-post this: Sox pitching staff MLB rank by WAR and RA9-WAR: 2002: 16 / 15 2003: 5 / 5 2004: 18 / 15 2005: 1 / 1 2006: 4 / 8 2007: 9 / 18 2008: 1 / 6 2009: 4 / 7 2010: 1 / 10 2011: 2 / 8 2012: 12 / 6 2013: 16 / 18 2014: 25 / 25 2015: 9 / 16 2016: 13 / 11 2017: 29 / 23 There certainly isn't much *under*achievement in there. Combined, the Sox are 3rd in MLB in fWAR (7th in RA9-WAR) since Coop took over. While maybe the bit about free agent acquisitions doesn't tell the whole story, I don't think the Sox have had anything like the 3rd most talent over that time.
  13. Right. He has a starter's repertoire and it's not very clear that he has acceptable command of any of it. I might feel differently if he could basically locate his fastball but just couldn't get any offspeed over. His current profile is as someone who would struggle just as much out of the pen. And he also profiles as someone who would be pretty good if he could flip the switch on his command because his stuff is plenty good. Totally agree. The demotion may or may not motivate Fulmer beyond where he already is, but I see no reason to believe that he would benefit much from having a message sent in this way. The benefit is pitching against a lower talent level, with less pressure, and perhaps on a more regular schedule. By all accounts he takes things very seriously, works very hard, and maybe is sufficiently intense and detail-oriented that it is detrimental to his ability to pitch in MLB. My general opinion is that there's a lot of value in a player having a track record of success. The flip side of that is there is a lot of uncertainty in projecting future performance that is better than the player's past performance. With that in mind, I think it's fair to be pessimistic about Fulmer. That being said, he has had a very unusual developmental path that makes me take his numbers with a grain of salt. We moved him through the minor leagues like he was Carlos Rodon or Chris Sale, but he just wasn't. A normal first round college pitcher would just now be reaching the majors. The problem for Fulmer is it will be hard to fill in those lost innings in the lower minors that he can never get back. Some of his issues could have potentially been ironed out against competition that wouldn't punish him for every lapse. When you face competition that kills you when you lapse, it becomes difficult to implement significant changes because you're just trying to survive. Hopefully he'll be able to take on some possibly ambitious changes to right himself in AAA.
  14. Looks like he's trying to hit a flop or something in golf
  15. Hope you're right, but I'm sure not seeing it in his splits: https://www.baseball-reference.com/register/player.fcgi?id=tilson000cha&type=bgl&year=2018
  16. Yeah it's not good. Tilson I'm not giving up on since his long time off means he would be expected to struggle for quite a while even if he's going to figure it out. But it's not like I'm going to spend any energy watching that process play out. I went to a Charlotte game a week or so ago and after Kopech left the game it was really hard to stay and watch.
  17. Before Nicky got hurt I was talking to a friend about how dismal the AAA options are. I might take Tito Polo over May and Tilson.
  18. No and what I'm saying can't be proved. But suppose the majority of Gordon's homers were about 15 feet past the fence. If he loses 20 feet on average with the switch to the new bats, then he loses a huge chunk of the homers. The guy who squares it up less often but clears the fence by 40-50 feet when he does, the new bats don't hurt as much. That's the logic — not everyone's game is as effected by the change in the bats.
×
×
  • Create New...