SleepyWhiteSox

QUOTE(NorthSideSox72 @ Jun 23, 2006 -> 12:41 PM) Have you ever posted anything in here that wasn't dripping with sacrasm and/or arrogance? Booo...that one was humorous and didn't come off as arrogant...most of minors' posts have been about how unbelievably amazing of a job republicans do anyways...

QUOTE(redandwhite @ Jun 23, 2006 -> 12:05 PM) You're right, it's just interesting that Kenny Williams concerns and main priority is to turn the Chicago White Sox into a first class organization If that were the main priority over winning then he would have addressed the Frank situation differently...Not saying that we don't wanna be a first-class organization, just that Kenny has shown that he would be the type that appreciates not backing down...

QUOTE(SoxFan76 @ Jun 23, 2006 -> 10:27 AM) Dude, if you need a one night hookup, I can help you out (no, not me, sickos). You seem desperate. Seriously... PM coming your way.

QUOTE(Steff @ Jun 23, 2006 -> 09:06 AM) Filed away for comparison when his "dirty secret" is revealed.. Source?

QUOTE(nitetrain8601 @ Jun 22, 2006 -> 12:06 PM) I think some people are underestimating Isiah. I see them as a better team with Isiah. About 10 wins better. Now I'm not saying Isiah is a better coach, but he'll be better for that team. 1)Isiah won't try to mold them. He'll let them do whatever they please on offense and not ask for much on defense. I agree completely...if they decide to drop out of the NBA and start their own streetball tour... QUOTE(THEWOOD @ Jun 22, 2006 -> 11:26 PM) This is the last time I am going to say this, GREG ODEN WILL NOT LEAVE OSU AFTER ONE YEAR!!! I'd suggest you enjoy his one year there and go to as many games as possible...

QUOTE(hi8is @ Jun 22, 2006 -> 11:06 PM) link? http://sports.yahoo.com/mlb/news;_ylt=Amz3...=yhoo&type=lgns calls Ozzie a coward...

QUOTE(soxman352000 @ Jun 22, 2006 -> 09:56 PM) f*** this guy. He and all of his other "journalist" at ESPN can kiss my ass. They only are writtng this s*** just because Mariotti is a regualr contributor to their network. All they are doing is trying to support Jay for a reason God only knows The yahoo sports one where the guy goes to a Chicago gay sports bar was kinda funny too...

QUOTE(ZoomSlowik @ Jun 22, 2006 -> 10:35 PM) Liriano appears to be the right answer right now. However, just for fun I'll throw Scott Kazmir and Justin Verlander out there. No doubt, but I'd like to see him do it a little bit longer, at least a few teams having a second go at him (even though I think he'll continue to be great). One guy who I like, even though he's struggled so far this year, and is only a couple of years older than those guys, is Peavy. Not saying I think he'll be the best out of the young guys but just throwing his name out there too.

QUOTE(Brian @ Jun 22, 2006 -> 10:28 PM) 867-5309 Has anybody tried calling mike jones?

QUOTE(whitesoxfan101 @ Jun 22, 2006 -> 03:43 PM) Chubby Ronaldo is going to be by himself as the all time leader in World Cup goals by the end of this tournament, if not game. lol I know...I was just making fun of the s*** he gets for being a bit heavy...Even though it certainly did show in the past couple of games, he still can be lethal as was shown today...

2nd goal for the chubby Ronaldo. 4-1 Brazil

QUOTE(LVSoxFan @ Jun 22, 2006 -> 11:39 AM) But is everybody going to keep pretending that he hasn't been a vocal Sox fan the past two years? QUOTE(LVSoxFan @ Jun 22, 2006 -> 11:55 AM) All right, I'll take your word for it. But again: where has he flip-flopped on the Sox over the past two seasons?

QUOTE(SleepyWhiteSox @ Jun 21, 2006 -> 04:41 PM) Yep, pouring buckets on the South Side... That was quick. Now it's sunny...

QUOTE(Milkman delivers @ Jun 21, 2006 -> 04:39 PM) It just started pouring over the Cell. Not sure how long this will last. Yep, pouring buckets on the South Side...

QUOTE(rangercal @ Jun 21, 2006 -> 04:33 PM) testing..... *** f***** Edit: Ok, works for the longer variation too. Just checking.

QUOTE(TheBigHurt @ Jun 21, 2006 -> 04:27 PM) Chuck Norris fan, are you?

QUOTE(SoxFan1 @ Jun 21, 2006 -> 04:15 PM) Hawk will not retire. He will die. Hawk died ten years ago, but the Grim Reaper can't get up the courage to tell him.

QUOTE(southsideirish71 @ Jun 21, 2006 -> 04:02 PM) Down boy!!!!

QUOTE(Cknolls @ Jun 21, 2006 -> 11:22 AM) How about if you don't like it go to PAT'S across the street. Great idea. QUOTE(Gregory Pratt @ Jun 21, 2006 -> 03:26 PM) I'm surprised nobody has come up to talk about how proud they are of this restaurant. http://www.soxtalk.com/forums/index.php?s=...dpost&p=1155233

QUOTE(henry wiggins @ Jun 21, 2006 -> 03:16 PM) Yeah. I should have made my posting name "Holly Wiggins" but I didn't think of it. Can I change it, do you know?

QUOTE(Steff @ Jun 21, 2006 -> 02:49 PM) I did not referance "a-shirt" in any of my posts, so your apology is accepted. QUOTE(Steff @ Jun 21, 2006 -> 01:53 PM) Or what is a shirt? QUOTE(Steff @ Jun 21, 2006 -> 02:18 PM) Re-f***ing-lax. Of course it's a shirt. They are all shirts. Did I say it wasn't a shirt? No. Good grief. Only because you kept mistaking "a-shirt" for "a shirt." Apology accepted. QUOTE(Steff @ Jun 21, 2006 -> 02:49 PM) Stop trying to pull me into your termanology disagreement with 72 and I wont have to point out your behavior. Likewise.

New yahoo layout looks terrible...

QUOTE(Steff @ Jun 21, 2006 -> 02:36 PM) I don't care what "a-shirt" is as I was not referring to it in any way, shepe, or form. Stop being a dick. It's a "dago t" so you were referring to it. If you don't care then just don't respond. Stop being so hard-headed and settle down with calling me a dick as it's been said over and over that personal remarks are unwanted here.

QUOTE(Steff @ Jun 21, 2006 -> 02:18 PM) Re-f***ing-lax. Of course it's a shirt. They are all shirts. Did I say it wasn't a shirt? No. Good grief. A-SHIRT, not "a shirt"...short for athletic shirt or athletic t-shirt...Click on the links I provided for further reference if it's still not sinking in...

QUOTE(Steff @ Jun 21, 2006 -> 01:53 PM) Or what is a shirt? A dago t? A dago t is defined as having no sleeves. If a undershirt has no sleeves, then yes it is considered a dago t. If it has sleeves, it's just a plain old undershirt. Best definition I can find is here. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wifebeater_%28shirt%29 From that very wikipedia page: My point being that I did not need to be corrected when calling it an "a-shirt."