I agree with the second paragraph . Not the first though. You need to walk a long way from Soldier field to find any type of entertainment. So most fans leave for home right after the game or sit and tailgate for a little while for traffic to clear. If there were bars/resteraunts within walking distance as the new site would propose it would increase that tremendously. And the money would go to the team which is what they are looking for.
I disagree. It's all about having an area and stdium that will bring more fans to the game and stay in the area to spend more money. So you are correct that the underlying reason is money. But they care about the fans to come and spend more of it. It's all about the fan experience.
I agree. Just kind of has an odd ring to it. I'm not sure if the Cubs ever called him that but it was his name with the Sox and that's the "iffy" part. I really don't care about the Cubs part.
I looked it up and it says Arlington Heights is in both Lake and Cook. Couldn't find exactly which part the stadium would be in but the municipality is on both.
Did anyone listen to the interview with Lori Lightfoot on the Score? The Bears are definitely moving. Her main points were:
1. It is not her fault the Bears signed the current deal 2 mayors ago.
2. she will maximize the tax payer value for any deal.
3. They will not get gambling as it will get in the way of Chicago casino
4. Soldier field is lucrative without the Bears.
5. She only wants to work with people who want to invest in Chicago as so many businesses are like the Chicago Fire.
She continued to say the Bears won't meet with her. I wonder why?
My conclusion was that he isn't processing the plays fast enough and he isn't ready to be out there. He will be better against the Lions just because he will have more time as that defense is not as good as the Browns.
Unless you hit someone in the head, why would hitting a batter bother a pitcher? Pitchers are selling out for velocity so control is at an all time low, especially without the sticky stuff.