ptatc

QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Apr 10, 2013 -> 07:05 PM) How would you like to have a $130 million payroll with no closer? But anyone can close. There is nothing special about it. The bigger outs are usually earlier in the game anyway.

QUOTE (witesoxfan @ Apr 11, 2013 -> 04:05 PM) Keon Barnum had his right hamate bone removed earlier this year. Here was ptatc's analysis regarding that Beckham's sounds different. It's doesn't sound like it displaced like Barnum's. If it took this long to diagnose it was probably a hairline type fracture. They won't do surgery and are probably just going to cast or splint it. The standard healing time for a fracture is 6-8 weeks. He will need some time to make sure he has full range of motion then go to a rehab assignment

QUOTE (lostfan @ Apr 10, 2013 -> 11:36 AM) It's mostly Bears fans who are 40 and older (especially the older ones) who always do that. In the past few years every time one of these Bears teams would have an elite defense, inevitably some old guy would call the Score or get on Sun-Times or Tribune articles and start rambling about how this team doesn't hold a candle to the '85 team, blah blah blah. STFU Grandpa I agree with the others. That team was so dominate that it will go down in history as one of the best. It is like the steel curtain, it will always be talked about as one of the best teams of all time, due to the defense and Payton. It deserves to be talked about.

QUOTE (CryptviLL @ Apr 9, 2013 -> 11:22 AM) Bryce and Strasburg Over-hyped. This isn't basketball where two stars will win. They may win but it will be because there are good players around them as well. Ask the Cubs of the late 60's who had multiple hall of famers on a team but still couldn't win.

QUOTE (danman31 @ Apr 8, 2013 -> 11:59 PM) Knights won 21-4 Lots of big offensive days and a nice start from Zaleski. Barons lost 5-1 Walker 4 K, Thompson 2 K Intimidators lost 6-4 Olacio rocked Braulio Oritz 2 IP, 5 K, BB, H How do you give up 5 runs on only 3 hits and 2 walks with only 1 double and no homeruns? That must have been a really weird inning.

QUOTE (flavum @ May 23, 2012 -> 10:41 AM) To tell you the truth, I wouldn't care if the home announcer didn't live and die with each game. If he's bringing me the game professionally with interesting content, I don't care if his blood isn't boiling when things go wrong. Chance are, when they're calling 150 games a year, they're going to lean toward the team paying the salary. It's when they go over the line, and think they're part of the team on the field that I have a problem with. To give you an example of somebody that straddled the line, but didn't cross it...John Rooney. He was never a "Sox fan", but he did a great job for the Sox and most people really liked how he called the game. I disagree. Learning about the history of the game is fun. I enjoy when people are fans of the game and enjoy the good things and get mad about bad things. That's the fun of sports. It's not life and death it's meant to be enjoyed. This isn't a broadcast about the serial killers and the deficit, it's sports.

QUOTE (IlliniKrush @ Apr 3, 2013 -> 09:03 PM) LMAO. Upset with a student newspaper giving out grades. If that effects your players, you need some new players. I can't blame Bernstein for not liking Coach K. You don't have to like him but you also don't need to relentlessly attack every college coach at every opportunity and beat it to death. He takes it overboard to vindictiveness and he comes of petty and jealous.

QUOTE (Joxer_Daly @ Apr 4, 2013 -> 11:28 AM) Clay pigeon shooting. Nothing but slaying those poor clay bastards all day long. Have you ever gotten the shards from one of those in your eye? It really stings!

QUOTE (Chicago White Sox @ Apr 3, 2013 -> 06:45 PM) What exactly did Coach K do to him when he was at Duke? I've heard Bernstein rip him before, but I've never heard the details. Was not very cooperative and arrogant with student press and such. Also the whole situation with preferential treatment of the basketball team.

QUOTE (Steve9347 @ Apr 3, 2013 -> 11:40 AM) You're right. Bernstein has a problem with coaches. But he doesn't go around making up stories to hurt their reputations. He's simply reporting something that Steve Alford did that is reprehensible. Not coaches. Only college coaches. There were Chicago area high school coaches with scandals recently. He doesn't mention it. But take a college coach and he's all over it. I'm not excusing any of the behavior. He is not wrong. But he has an agenda and he rides ad nauseum. I don't listen often but it's the same thing over and over again.

QUOTE (IlliniKrush @ Apr 3, 2013 -> 10:31 AM) Part of it stems from the interview that was on his show when the whole thing happened, so there's a stronger connection there. All of stems from the way Coach K treated HIM at Duke. HE absolutely has hated college coaches since then. HE believes they all have too much power and will do evil things with it. HE was taking shots at NU for hiring Collins because Collins picked Duke over NU. HE will always attack college coaches as much as possible and will not consider any other side.

QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Mar 29, 2013 -> 11:50 AM) Verlander extended for 7 years $180 million, with an option year that could make it 8/202. This is one of those deals that will look really bad the last couple of years. I know he is one of the best but almost 26 million for a 37 year old pitcher? Unless it's really front loaded, it will be hard to work with.

QUOTE (ScottyDo @ Mar 29, 2013 -> 09:23 AM) No I'm satisfied with the explanation, I am even less of an expert than you! It would definitely be interesting to hear from an actual pitching coach about the mechanics of it. Or even ptatc might know, with his rehab history. The basic reason is that while the theory is to keep the arm at the exact same speed, that is really hard to do. Most of the drop in velocity comes from the different grip. However the arm speed does slow as well, hopefully not enough to tip the pitch. As long as the arm slot and mechanics stays the same the hitter doesn't have enough time to gauge the arm speed if it's only off a little. This is why the FB is slower in relation to the changeup and the difference isn't enough to fool hitters.

QUOTE (flavum @ Mar 27, 2013 -> 09:25 AM) So tell me... When does John Danks take the bump for the White Sox for the first time this season? Early May.

QUOTE (The Ginger Kid @ Mar 26, 2013 -> 11:43 AM) Go out to the practice fields and you can catch a ton of guys coming back from practice at 11:30ish. They're a bit more laid back and not getting ready to play a game. Hawk and Stoney were signing and chatting with fans, one even talked Hawk into giving him his home run call. Konerko chatted with us last year and Courtney Hawkins was pretty funny this spring and getting a lot of attention from fans. Omogrosso was hilarious talking to some of us. This is the best time for autographs. The atmosphere is much more conducive to talk to the players and get the signatures. Players do like to be bothered around the game even in Spring Training.

QUOTE (flavum @ Mar 26, 2013 -> 04:09 PM) Yeah, I'm not sure what goes into that. Like, why did they option Jordan Danks and Blake Tekotte at the same time, but they've brought Brandon Short and Stefan Gartrell up from minor league since then? Don't know. They do this to get the minor league teams acclimated together. They keep the extra pitchers to pitch in relief on the 2 days prior the start of the season so they don't use all of the MLB ones.

QUOTE (Jordan4life @ Mar 26, 2013 -> 04:03 PM) Damn. That was actually a pretty good piece. And he backs up the article with legitimate numbers. Yes, the game has indeed changed. And I love it. Going back to pre-PED abuse era. Most players will need to choose between contact and power. Could you make a case for Canseco being one of the most influential figures in MLB history? He really changed the game for a couple of decades. Vast rule changes were made because of him.

QUOTE (fathom @ Mar 24, 2013 -> 10:01 PM) I'll never understand why they didn't go into ST thinking that Santiago was going to be a starter. Because Danks was throwing painfree prior to Spring training and was on the same schedule as everyone else. There was no reason to think that he wouldn't be ready. Unfortunately, his fastball hasn't returned as quickly as they would have liked.

QUOTE (southside_hitman @ Mar 24, 2013 -> 12:16 PM) I don't understand your anger, your accusation of "trolling" or your thinly veiled threat of expulsion from the forum. First you were wrong in ascribing the opinion of the physician who performed this surgery on mlb pitchers to me. The entire paragraph was from an article that was properly linked. You failed to read it before casting your opinion. You chose to ignore the opinion of the surgeon that actually performed this operation on numerous occasions in favor of an anonymous physical therapist that posts on this forum. I did not choose to continue this thread. However, in addition to the fact that the article I posted with a very thorough analysis of this from a specialist, a suggestion was made that Danks capsule tear was "not a significant injury." Do you think that is a reasonable assessment of the injury? I have no agenda on John Danks injury but is seems clear to me that others choose to ignore what has been learned from similar surgical procedures and the physician that performed them. Based on that information I simply stated that none of us know how long it will take for Danks to return to his prior form. It could be a few weeks or perhaps a few months. Perhaps he will never be exactly the same as he was years ago. We just don't know. You have no basis under the rules of this forum to expel me. I have conducted myself properly here and have not even approached the level of anger, the type of sarcasm, the hatred, or the vulgarity that some have used. I can only conclude from your threat that you have an agenda and that agenda is to eliminate me from the forum for some reason that has nothing to do with any violation of the rules. Given that, I am not going to respond to you further because this is truly a bunch of nonsense and a waste of time. It's not a waste of time when you refuse to acknowledge the fact that Danks has begun throwing painfree much earlier than any of the examples from a few years ago. You can be as negative as you want but there is more evidence that he is doing well and will return soon as opposed to it taking up to 2 years in some of the examples you have cited. Is it possible he could take that ong, of course. However given his current progression there is no reason to jump to that conclusion.

QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Mar 23, 2013 -> 12:19 PM) The exact same thing happened with Kreutz. The Bears offered him more than any other team in the NFL would have based on his age and performance the year or two beforehand, Kreutz decided it was an insult, the Bears signed someone else for less money, Kreutz then signed elsewhere for less than the Bears offered. And then he quit when he realized he wasn't going to get the favored treatment he got with the Bears.

QUOTE (southside_hitman @ Mar 22, 2013 -> 03:38 PM) Of course you are misquoting AND providing a false characterization of what I said. I never stated that Danks is or isn't "healthy" but in any case, his health is not the issue. Danks feels fine and the shoulder may well be healed structurally...but the fact is that he can't pitch at a near an acceptable level as a starter, as demonstrated in his last four starts which have been abysmal Danks further away from Chicago after ugly fourth outing If you want to believe he will return earlier than other pitchers have from this kind of injury and surgical procedure, fine. I hope he does and that you are right. The fact remains though that this is just conjecture and wishful thinking. He has returned earlier than the others. He started throwing earlier and has been painfree doing so. It is not wishful thinking or conjecture it is an educated guess based on rehab progression. Until there is a set back there is no reason to think otherwise and every reason to be positive. Now if it's reported that he needs to stop throwing due to pain, it's a whole new ballgame, so to speak.

QUOTE (southside_hitman @ Mar 22, 2013 -> 01:00 PM) "The fact that he was throwing painfree on a regular schedule for spring training tells you he will pitch this season." That is a mere presumption that is not based on fact. It is precisely the sort of wishful thinking that resulted in Ventura believing that Danks would be ready at the start of the season. Again, the fact is that no one knows when Danks will return to his prior form or even if he will. If you disagree with that, you are welcome to your opinion, but that is based on your belief, nothing more. As far as predictions on rehabilitation from injury. How about Derrick Rose? He feels OK and reportedly can dunk, but he is not able to play. No one can predict when he will return with any certainty. This situation is similar. Just accept the fact. Regarding Santana's similar injury return to being close to his prior form: " The small number of pitchers who have undergone the procedure thus far leaves recovery timetable estimates imprecise. It's too small a number to really be confident about when they're going to come back, and how to exactly manage their recovery," Altchek says. "We're still feeling our way through, quite honestly. It obviously takes a minimum of a year. That's the absolute minimum. And probably the average is going to net out to be closer to two." Wang similarly made his major league return on the two-year anniversary of his anterior capsule surgery. Inside Johan Santana's comeback All rehab is based on current research however since all people are different there is no such thing as a medical fact. However, based on common surgical and rehab protocols (and alot of experience) there is every reason to believe that everything is going on schedule. Of course there is no guarantee or fact after injury especially surgery. But the way he is progressing should show nothing but positives.

QUOTE (southside_hitman @ Mar 22, 2013 -> 10:23 AM) RV was obviously wrong about the relative severity of a capsule tear (which he knows about as much about as we do) and in stating that Danks would be ready for the beginning of this season, no problem. OK, RV meant well and was being positive, but at the same time you don't want to raise false expectations. The fact remains that there is no way to tell when Danks will return if at all this season. We do not even know what the details of the surgical procedure were, i.e., how large the tear or damage was, whether there is any scar tissue in the capsule from the repair, and how they capsule will mechanically impact throwing motion, location of pitches, and velocity. As to the velocity of Danks pitches, it has been reported that he touched 90 but if you saw the last game he pitched, they must have been using a speed gun that was not calibrated recently. The hitters had enough time to hitch up and take softball swings at his pitches. I hope Danks comes back strong because we need him in the rotation and not Axelrod or Santiago. Also, it will make my signed Danks stuff worth more. The fact that he was throwing painfree on a regular schedule for spring training tells you he will pitch this season. The variable is how long it takes the strength to return. The capsule is structurally sound after the repair and scar tissue would be a good thing to reinforce it. It is a very thin structure. Many times it takes a while for a pitcher to get a feel for the new shoulder but the fact that he has been reported to be painfree is the reason to think he will be back and probably soon.

QUOTE (Brian @ Mar 20, 2013 -> 05:58 PM) It was time. Shell of former self. Hope he retires. The PCL injury 2 seasons ago really robbed him of the mobility he used to have. That injury is devastating to anyone who has to explosively pivot and run.

QUOTE (caulfield12 @ Mar 20, 2013 -> 08:10 PM) Yeah, it goes back to the way Pods and Iguchi played the game the first half of 2005 together. You take advantage of the holes in the defense, situationally. How many times have we seen Sox hitters pull balls to 3B and SS in those situations for tailor-made double plays? (Yes, Alexei or Alex Rios in the past or any number of Sox offenders). That's not to say they've never hit the ball to the opposite side and unintentionally grounded into a DP, but the odds of getting a hit are much higher going that direction than pulling the ball, because you have the 1B covering the bag and the 2B in movement with the possibility of a steal, opening up 85% of the right side depending on the situation. But yeah, sacrificing yourself in that way is totally different than bunting a runner over to put him in scoring position. And I don't remember as many complaints about Harold Baines (when he was the best hitter on the team for nearly a decade) making similar "selfish" outs, compared to the criticism that Thomas received as a purported "stats first, team second" player. You don't remember them about Harold because he didn't talk to anyone. Harold was the cliche of the same player whether he had a good day or bad day. That's my point with Thomas. He is the best right handed hitter I've seen but it was more the way he was so obvious with complaining about stats and errors that should be turned into hits. He always focused on those thing after games. There were games the Sox won and he was miserable and angry because a hit was taken away. Some of the reason that players don't hit the other way is that is decreases power which in turn decreases OPS which is the current "best way" to determine the overall quality of a hitter.