Jump to content

Dam8610

Members
  • Posts

    4,370
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by Dam8610

  1. Thank you for finally getting this done Kenny. Buehrle, you're my hero for taking such a discount.
  2. You think the Padres would trade Peavy for Dye?
  3. QUOTE(Gregory Pratt @ May 5, 2007 -> 06:11 PM) I'm not even going to argue with you about it. Anyone can see that over the last few weeks Erstad's been excellent on the field. What's Brian Anderson's OPS+? I'll bet it's more like OPS- Considering OPS+ goes on a scale of 100 being average, Erstad having a 79 OPS+ could be considered an OPS-.
  4. QUOTE(SnB @ Apr 18, 2007 -> 09:54 PM) skip it, like a normal american I would, but I've done that too much lately...perhaps I'll just leave early. QUOTE(BobDylan @ Apr 18, 2007 -> 09:59 PM) I missed it because of class. Just saw it'll be replayed at 11:30 tonight as well. YES!
  5. In the words of Jack Buck: "I DON'T BELIEVE WHAT I JUST SAW!" QUOTE(Kalapse @ Apr 18, 2007 -> 09:45 PM) The Cubs game is on at 1:30AM the Sox game will be replayed tomorrow at 1:30PM. NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO! I have class at 2.
  6. QUOTE(Kalapse @ Apr 15, 2007 -> 02:08 AM) $17M/$23M per year. YEAR 1: $17M YEAR 2: $17M YEAR 3: $17M YEAR 4: $23M YEAR 5: $23M YEAR 6: $23M YEAR 7: $23M ---------------- TOTAL: $143M over 7 years. That makes more sense. Can Minnesota afford that though?
  7. QUOTE(Flash Tizzle @ Apr 15, 2007 -> 12:10 AM) Perhaps 17 million for 3 years, 23 million for the last 4 -- which en total becomes 143mil/7yrs. About 20 million per year. Hardly unreasonable. Your math is just a tad off there. That's 7 years/$40 million, or less that $6 million per year. No way Santana takes that little.
  8. QUOTE(BearSox @ Apr 7, 2007 -> 11:41 AM) Jacoby (how do you even pronounce that?) Ellisbury. Ja-CO-by (at least that's the way I've heard it before), and I doubt the Red Sox will part with him. QUOTE(caulfield12 @ Apr 8, 2007 -> 10:06 AM) Michael Bourn (I really like him a lot, exciting player) Isn't he pretty much untouchable?
  9. QUOTE(witesoxfan @ Apr 7, 2007 -> 07:02 PM) He didn't pitch against the White Sox as an Expo. His numbers against the Sox as a Yankee - 16 IP, 8 H, 2 ER, 1 HR, 4 BB, 11 K - which is good for a 1.13 ERA, 0.75 WHIP, and a near 3:1 K/BB So he was good against the White Sox. That also means he had a 5+ ERA against the rest of the league that year. I don't know about you, but I'd rather not see that Vazquez.
  10. QUOTE(lemon44 @ Apr 7, 2007 -> 05:54 PM) Now that's why Kenny got Javy. Great game reminds of what Javy did to us back in 2004 when he was a yankee. More like what he did with Montreal in 2001 or 2003. He was a disaster as a Yankee.
  11. Considering I'm a Colts fan, I'll take the 05 Sox in a landslide.
  12. QUOTE(Kalapse @ Dec 28, 2006 -> 01:46 PM) MARK MULDER WILL NOT SIGN FOR ANYTHING LESS THAN $14M OVER 2 YEARS, HE'S NOT GOING TO TURN DOWN ~$12M OF GUARANTEED MONEY FROM THE RANGERS/CARDINALS JUST TO PLAY FOR THE SOX. $14M over 2 IS INCREDIBLY EXPENSIVE FOR A PLAYER WHO'S AS BIG OF A QUESTION MARK AS MULDER IS. Why do you say that with such certainty? Mulder DID grow up a Sox fan, and he wouldn't be the first person in recent years to turn down more money from the Rangers to play for the White Sox (Dye).
  13. Does anyone else think that Mulder could turn out like Dye if he's willing to accept a contract below market value?
  14. QUOTE(Dick Allen @ Dec 26, 2006 -> 06:02 PM) I think the only reason he wouldn't net as much would be the additional cash he is owed. Its amazing on this board how awful pitchers on other teams are and how valuable they are as White Sox players when they have similar numbers. It could be because Garcia is 12 years younger, and put up better numbers than Randy. Call it a hunch.
  15. QUOTE(Balta1701 @ Dec 26, 2006 -> 04:37 PM) According to KFMB in San Diego, Chad Tracy is involved in the trade talks. Wow.
  16. QUOTE(kevo880 @ Dec 26, 2006 -> 05:04 PM) I believe KW has gone on the record and said it's mainly between Floyd, Haeger, and Danks. I can't remember where I read that though. Predicted order of finish (if that's the case): 1) Charlie Haeger 2) Gavin Floyd 3) John Danks (not that he won't perform well, I just don't think he'll show enough to get the job, or even come close)
  17. If Scott Linebrink is part of the SD package, he's already too pricy to acquire. The Sox may be interested, but I'm not, especially at that kind of price.
  18. The knuckler gets the 5th spot.
  19. QUOTE(spiderman @ Dec 23, 2006 -> 06:20 PM) Danks split last season between Double-A Frisco and Triple-A Oklahoma, where he combined to go 9-9 with a 4.24 ERA in 27 games (26 starts). He has a career minor league record of 21-30 with a 4.20 ERA in 92 games (82 starts). Question: Did Danks pitch in pitcher friendly parks ??? I don't know about the AA park he was in, but I'm fairly sure most of he parks in the PCL are a hitter's wet dream.
  20. QUOTE(Tony82087 @ Dec 23, 2006 -> 05:46 PM) From what some of us have heard, yes, there is more. While the reason given is frustrating to take, it makes some sense. That reason being? (for those of us who are less enlightened and still extremely frustrated with this deal, such as myself)
  21. QUOTE(Wanne @ Dec 23, 2006 -> 05:31 PM) Me too. In my mind...McCarthy=Kip Wells. If McCarthy goes a full season with Texas...I predict his record will be around 11-16. I missed the part where Kip Wells had the stuff McCarthy has.
  22. QUOTE(Reddy @ Dec 23, 2006 -> 04:31 PM) masset is on the 40, danks is not. Danks isn't even on the 40? Wow.
  23. Williams better be right about Danks. If not, the Sox are up a creek on this one...
×
×
  • Create New...