The Ginger Kid
Members-
Posts
18,273 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by The Ginger Kid
-
White Sox (63-48) @ Orioles (37-74), 5/5 Game THREAD
The Ginger Kid replied to Steve9347's topic in 2010 Season in Review
shocking -
White Sox (63-48) @ Orioles (37-74), 5/5 Game THREAD
The Ginger Kid replied to Steve9347's topic in 2010 Season in Review
Q's failure looms even larger -
White Sox (63-48) @ Orioles (37-74), 5/5 Game THREAD
The Ginger Kid replied to Steve9347's topic in 2010 Season in Review
has Q changed his hand position again? -
But the twins are very reluctant to deal their prospects for impact players at the deadline. I remember Morneau expressing his frustration and I'm sure there are a lot of players on that team who wish they would've made moves before the deadline that could've turned some of those division winning years into WS seasons. Personally, I don't want the Twins system. I respect it, but I'd rather have the "go for it" attitude of Kenny than that conservative approach.
-
QUOTE (lostfan @ Jul 28, 2010 -> 11:50 AM) You're actually talking about several different individual people and lumping them all together into a single stream of consciousness. But aren't those all individual arguments for the same thing, ie, "I want Ozzie and KW gone"?
-
QUOTE (RockRaines @ Jul 27, 2010 -> 07:29 PM) Probably followed by people hating that there arent impact players in the minors, while clamoring to make big trades at the deadline by dealing top prospects. so, so true
-
QUOTE (lostfan @ Jul 27, 2010 -> 03:00 PM) I meant that the Sox going on a 25-5 run and currently being in first place doesn't answer any deeper, macro-level questions about the overall direction of the organization, its philosophy, what we look like for 2011, what our chances are if we reach the playoffs, how we fare against our own divisional opponents, roster management, and so on. It just means this team was ridiculously hot for 6 weeks and went 25-5, so hot that they caught up and landed in first place. It doesn't tell you how good (obviously not THAT good because maintaining that level of play is impossible) or bad (obviously not bad because bad teams can't win 25 of 30 games) they are. It's not an answer to anything in itself. Thanks for the clarification.
-
QUOTE (lostfan @ Jul 26, 2010 -> 07:04 PM) That's really not at all what I said. My question was sincere, I'm asking what you mean.
-
QUOTE (lostfan @ Jul 26, 2010 -> 04:21 PM) Well "this team is in first place and recently went 25-5" is a pretty lazy argument and doesn't really say anything worthwhile all by itself. It would be like saying "you must be pretty well off because you drive a BMW" how are those 2 things remotely similar? you don't have to have money to driver a BMW, i get that. But you don't have to be a good team to go 25-5 and overcome a 9 game deficit to be in first place?
-
Saunders really took the news hard, very tearful
-
QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Jul 26, 2010 -> 02:29 PM) What I'd have loved to hear is "Yeah, I sucked today, but you know what, it was a bad day, I'm going to go out my next couple outings and earn that job back." yes, that would be better than the denial. I'm dying to know where he's hiding his curveball. Maybe he should go back to the stretch?