Jump to content

southsider2k5

Admin
  • Posts

    179,648
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    422

Everything posted by southsider2k5

  1. Pretty sure the "owed" part was negotiated out with the 2003 changes.
  2. Nice to see these guys start to give a s%*# after losing 120 games. Great work Getzy
  3. Haha, me too. That's awesome. Guess I will survive the Soxpocollypse after all.,
  4. I don't understand how you can't see that this has happened all over professional sports and it eventually gets done.
  5. Did we know the business plan for any other network at this point?
  6. You know Xfinity isn't the only network in existance, right?
  7. They will have their own profit motivations, just like they did when the carried Fox Sports and Marquee. What you are posting has literally never been done before, where a team was completely shut off of all of the major networks. It is crazy. Why do I think Jerry can handle this 29, er teams have done this, as well as Jerry has done it multiple times with this exact service in this exact market. For whatever reason you are completely dug in on this one and have no other thought but this one.
  8. That doesn't mean nothing is ever going to get done. That is a gigantic leap. THAT is what would actually be unprecedented.
  9. We aren't though. The only even sort of unique thing here it the OTA option. Again, the Yankees had this problem with YES. The Dodgers had this problem with their new network. The Astros managed to pull a 0.0 rating because they were awful and available on so few networks. Even the Cubs did this, and then eventually figured it out, having a long fight with Comcast. https://cubsinsider.com/2024/06/11/marquee-sports-networks-future-looks-bumpy-as-comcast-contract-ends-in-september/
  10. This. We have seen exactly this stuff happen with all of the big independent networks. The broadcast billionaires battles the sports billionaires and eventually they figure it out.
  11. They meaning the White Sox changed their mind, not Batista?
  12. Is this due to the Marco Paddy change or greed?
  13. You don't think this is done like ever? Do you have any other example of this ever happening in this industry? Becuase I don't.
  14. It is wild that the Sox best marketing campaign has been to suck like no one has ever sucked before.
  15. OK, so literally all that matters is the games. Cool. I agree with that. Not sure what else is left to be more of a disaster then. These carriage agreements will eventually be done. Literally the same s%*# happened for the Yankees, Dodgers, Astros and others. They are going to have the same stooges as broadcasters. They already have cheap ass graphics, so there isn't much of a chance there. They are already have in house stooges running their pre and post, and odds are it will be the same teams doing it on the new network. Even if it isn't 10/1 but 10/5 or 10/15 these deals will be done. Once that is done, it will be the same old, same old.
  16. And we got so much better when Robert and Eloy got back.
  17. Reinsdorf ran this last network and it was a disaster. What else is new? There is a complete absence of decent programming besides the games and game related materials. What am I missing here?
  18. We will get there, I am sure. As bad as he is, a quiet hitpiece of his work ethic will happen soon enough.
  19. It's like saying "yes we would all be way better if we had real players playing these games" and that is why we failed, when we know that we weren't going to have those players anyway.
×
×
  • Create New...