southsider2k5

If you lose Hawk, you have lost the war.

He still fully believes that Brooks was the one who screwed him over.

Well it is over for him... probably forever.

https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5760647/2024/09/13/hawk-harrelson-white-sox-wont-watch/?campaign=5888993&source=dailyemail&userId=6062851

Imagine giving up a baseball career because you are pissy about something.

It checks out.

Who are we trading him to?

Sure. Because we needed a fact check on that.

Nah, we don't acknowledge failure after they leave here

Or the nuclear explosion after it hit the iceberg repeatedly.

To the career death.

Even David Eckstein managed a .701 for his career.

^

And a couple of those Excuse O Matics look like fools.

I have seen a lot of much less likely suggestions.

DeLoach and Fletcher would like a word.

The Tigers get it. What a great promo

I love how they talk about these guys "playing hard", but then are sliding stories about how lazy half of these guys are to their preferred leaks. Two faces, all of them.

Look the idea that this was "planned" is absurd. You don't make the moves the Sox made, both in the off season and during it, if you plan on losing 110 games. You look to push upur future ahead, and not worthless short term flotsam. It's insulting to try to play both sides of the fence.

It's already been deleted. I am not wasting my time sending any acknowledgement of that.

Hahahahahahahahahahaha