Way to leave out the end of the quote.
You know for someone who complains about Frank being "misunderstood", you think you would have more class than to take half of a quote from an article.
I read that part of the quote too, but it seemed so "cliche" that it was obvious the pathetic leader was trying to back track when he realized he was doing the same thing he had the nerve to challenge Frank for last year.
Hopefully, this slump puts some humility in him. He will obviously pull out of this slump at some time (well, he cannot get any worse now can he?)......hopefully then he will learn to shut is trap when he is doing well instead of telling the world how everyone else is a baby for not getting to play
My point is that people complain about how Frank is percieved yet when they get the chance to jump on Paul Konerko, they purposefully pull a quote out and show it in the worst possible light, leaving out a key part. You read into it and got an intrepretation of it, that you didn't like so you left it out. Why the double standard? Why would you do the EXACT SAMETHING to Konerko, that is so wrong to do to Frank? To me that is hypocratical, and it makes the arguement that Frank is misunderstood all the more lame, because you are PURPOSEFULLY doing it to Konerko to make Thomas look better.