Cknolls

QUOTE (Chisoxfn @ Sep 16, 2015 -> 12:08 PM) Presume that is family coverage? Yes. PPO Plus through UHC.....Also we were informed that that plan will not be available come 2018.....So i did like my plan but unfortunately i do not get to keep it because Obama knows better. But like i said i do have transgender coverage now, so i have that going for me...

QUOTE (Brian @ Sep 15, 2015 -> 05:16 PM) Damn. Don't know what you do but $25 is still so much lower than what comes out of my check. I pay $100 a month medical. Think $10 a month dental. $25 is the increase....Not the total premium. It will increase $50/mo. My total monthly healthcare premiums right now are $625/mo.(including dental and vision) Increasing to over $700/mo next year...

Premiums going up from $3.00- $25.00 per paycheck Dental going up $1.63- $4.61 per paycheck Vision going up $1.25-$3.25 per paycheck Rx co pays going up from $10 to $12 They are removing PPO plus plan by 2018(thank you Narcissus you piece of s***) But hey we now have transgendered coverage

Fabulous idea. We need more people on welfare. We can afford it as a country. All for it.....but only if every last one of the "refugees" is settled in Manhattan, San Francisco, Beverly Hills, Georgetown, Greenich, Michigan Avenue, Palm Beach,Fla., etc....King s***head will do whatever he wants..Executive order....signing statement....blah blah blah....A disgrace to the office and the country....

QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Sep 9, 2015 -> 03:03 PM) If we want to talk about judgment mistakes by Hillary I continue to be open to that. For example, I've voted against her previously and will probably still vote against her again due to her incorrect judgment on the worst strategic mistake the United States has made in the last 50 years, perhaps in its whole history depending on how things shake out in that part of the world over the next few decades. Compared to that act of poor judgment, "having her own email server so she can use both work and private email on the same address while following poorly written state department rules" doesn't measure up at all. Why did she lie about it then?

So we have the most transparent administration ever hiring a "transparency czar". Clinton should be paying for this stiff. You cannot make this stuff up. This is f***ing hilarious...but don't say anything because you are racist or misogynist.... We have the former lawyer at the IRS, after disposing of all the dirt, moving over to State to cover up the dirt there.

Gotcha. Thanks.

Is there a link anywhere to the entire 23 page diatribe by this guy? ABC NEWS link?

Narcissus is promoting racial healing at a record pace......Oh wait........Haven't seen a comment from asshole about the execution of the Harris County Sheriif.....Doesn't promote his agenda...

Opportunities are made up easier than losses....

QUOTE (caulfield12 @ Aug 24, 2015 -> 08:22 PM) 17 of the last 48 times there was a 5% correction, it continued downwards to 10% or greater...so the odds are roughly 35-40% IF you can time it right. On the other hand, it bounced back positively even more frequently. Now it just depends on what you sold exactly, transaction/brokerage fees...cost to get back into the market again, if you looked at it every occasion you attempted to "time" the market and how much money you actually were able to save versus an approach of dollar cost averaging (or even doubling your investments in the midst of a correction of 5-10% or more waiting for a bounce back long-term). It's not easy to do. Bill Miller of Legg Mason famously beat the S&P Index for 13 consecutive years (Value Trust/LMVTX) and became one of the most reputable managers in the game...yet the combination of 2001-2002 and 2008-2009 did such a number on him that he was relieved of his position and in fact the name of his fund became so poisonous it had to be changed to Clear Bridge Value Trust. In a different way, the same thing has happened to Bill Gross of Pimco Total Bond Index...hubris in thinking you can time the market consistently, well, we all know what happened to Icarus. I dont think Bill Miller timed the market. I think he stayed balls in in 2008 and was b**** slapped for doing so....different animal

QUOTE (HickoryHuskers @ Aug 24, 2015 -> 10:15 AM) I've done pretty well with it in the past. I always err on the side of caution, because even if I miss an upswing in the markets, I'm earning 3% a year, which is a lot better than losing 5-10% in a week. Congrats to you! Very wise move... You saved yourself a percent or two and even more because it will take that much larger of a move to the upside to make up for all the losses incurred today'. Kudos!

Prayers go out to President Carter. Have some personal experience with brain cancer (glio blastoma) and it is not pretty. Hopefully melanoma is more treatable/ less invasive than glio blastoma...

QUOTE (Jake @ Aug 20, 2015 -> 12:27 PM) Most precedent suggest that for nuclear disarmament, treaties work well and sanctions work poorly So you agree then that Narcissus should have negotiated this as a Treaty? We agree on something..

http://bigstory.ap.org/article/a9f4e408039...-nuke-work-site Well i am aboard now...Rest assured we are in good hands.

QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Aug 7, 2015 -> 08:18 PM) How is the IAEA not independent? The US DOE has tested whether you can fully scrub a room in 24 days and actually remove all traces of highly enriched uranium. You can't. That stuff is really hard to get rid of because it's extremely easy to detect a single particle of it. And that's on top of the ability to look for "large movements of heavy equipment" in the area. And if you don't think this deal is strict enough, I want to know what you'd do to increase pressure on Iran to make that happen...keeping in mind that no other country would go along with you because they consider this deal sufficient and the U.S. does not trade much with Iran. Basically...the U.S. was pushing for the strongest deal possible, to the point where they almost lost everyone else holding sanctions in the process. If the U.S. rejects this deal, the sanctions regime will crumble and Iran will know there is a high likelihood the U.S. is going to invade them in the near future. The U.S. will then have to race to launch attacks and an invasion before Iran can actually complete a crash course to build a weapon to defend themselves from the upcoming U.S. invasion. It's just about that simple. It's this deal or war with a country 2.5 times the population and 3.5 times the area of Iraq. Your choice. Even if it came to military action, I do not see the U.S. Invading Iran. Blowing the hell out of the suspected sites? Yes. Invasion? No. Still do not have an answer as to why we agreed to the ballistic missile and weapons give up. And still no answer how they will enforce this agreement if they cannot even enforce the existing sanctions on one man. the UN is useless. We need to think long and hard about the amount of money we send there.

QUOTE (caulfield12 @ Aug 8, 2015 -> 02:18 AM) And almost none of the questions were answered... Take away Trump and Christie, what was actually that interesting? Just wait and see the tv ratings when Trump is no longer on the panel, they'll regress to mean. Rubio did well with his questions, Kasich as well...and Bush stumbled a bit about the Bloomberg charity involvement. The same exact panel, minus Trump, had a forum on Monday night and nobody was paying attention. Everyone simply wanted to see whether Trump would attempt to be serious or not, and who he would offend or piss off...not unlike watching Simon Cowell eviscerate a poor singer on American Idol. The interest in the first Perot/Clinton/Bush debate was much higher, because for the first time in modern history a third party candidate had a real opening to actually win. http://www.museum.tv/debateweb/html/histor...2/headlines.htm The last Bush/Perot/Clinton debate had 91 million viewers, at a time when the U.S. population was lower. Romney/Obama was around 67 million. Palin-Biden 70 million. Why are you comparing Presidential debates to Primary debates? Can you just get over your partisanship for just one minute to objectively look at even the smallest of metrics such as ratings? Seriously. We get it, you don't like R's. They don't walk on water like Narcissus. Noted.

Well its a good sign that Iran will comply with the agreement, after all the Quds Force General just travelled to Russia against currently imposed UN Sanctions...

QUOTE (StrangeSox @ Aug 4, 2015 -> 01:33 PM) 1) There's no wrongdoing here. Shouting about it more without actually backing it up doesn't change that. Medical procedures can sound "gross" when described bluntly and emotionless, but that would apply to other tissue, organ and cadaver donations as well. 2) Cutting the HHS budget by $500 million means that a whole lot of reproductive services will be gutted over another faux hidden camera video scandal. edit: and since you're so concerned about wrongdoing, you may be interested to know that a judge has issued an injunction against them releasing any more of their secretly recorded and heavily edited videos as they may have violated confidentiality agreements. They appear to be willfully violating that restraining order. Good for them....A liberal judge from Frisco whose wife was a bundler for Obama...The Tides Foundation could cover that, so too could Soros...Everything is always gutted..This govt NEEDS gutting...

QUOTE (StrangeSox @ Jul 31, 2015 -> 12:48 PM) But since there's no wrongdoing shown, there's not really anything to investigate. Using ultrasound to harvest body parts is an everyday practice at PP? or are they altering their practices(illegal) to achieve an end result? Just cut the HHS budget by $500 million and you solve this problem...If asshole wants to veto it, let him.After all he supports killing babies born alive

BTW, when does the nonpartisan Justice Dept decide to investigate these criminals at Planned Parenthood? I know.......Cold day in Hell....

http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2015...a-socialist.php Uhhhhh.....uhhhhhh...Republicans bad.....uhhhhhh.....uuuhhhhh big tent we are....uhhh..uhhhhhRepublicans bad..uuhhhhh...Abortions for all.....uhhh uhh Planned Prenthood is great...uhhh uhhhhh lol

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/4214...-iran-agreement Most transparent Admin Evahhhh.........

QUOTE (Alpha Dog @ Jul 16, 2015 -> 03:41 PM) More than one person needs to fry for those. And there are supposedly links to Lois Lerner as well. Just one big clusterf*** of illegal s*** they do in the name of the Party, because in their minds, the ends justify the means. Yeah the Dems are good like that..Ted Stevens would have attested to that...

http://legalinsurrection.com/2015/07/wisco...-conservatives/ FINALLY!!!!! Now a nice civil judgement against this ass clown will end things....And maybe a disbarment