HeGone33

Overpaying for a young QB star? Only what every team does........

QUOTE (BigSqwert @ Jan 19, 2014 -> 11:09 AM) In two games this year, SF had scored one TD against Seattle. Great logic. Comparing previous games this year also worked out well for the Panthers. 49ers are a much different team now, so are the Seahawks.

QUOTE (HickoryHuskers @ Jan 13, 2014 -> 11:38 AM) So, in other words, ignore the small sample size and focus on the even smaller sample size. Or talk to me in 12 months, with the larger sample size, like I said. If you want to talk trends, take a look at the small sample size.

QUOTE (Soxbadger @ Jan 13, 2014 -> 11:23 AM) Besides for tallness Wilson is statistically better than Kaep. Player A 16 243 416 58.4 3,197 7.69 21 64 8 3 68.6 91.6 Player B 16 257 407 63.1 3,357 8.25 26 80 9 8 58.9 101.2 Rushing Player A 16 92 524 5.7 28 4 28 3 1 Player B 16 96 539 5.6 27 1 31 2 0 Not really worth debating though because I guess Drew Brees isnt as good as Michael Vick because Michael Vick is tall and just wait until the future when he gets his s*** together. LOL (edit) Not to mention Wilson has been in the NFL a year less, so I have no reason to believe that Kaep will improve when Wilson wont. I'll repeat on the stats, talk to me in 12 months. There is not much of a gap there at all currently. Kap has been in the league 1 year longer, however has 9 less regular season starts. If you look at the 2nd half of this season, one player has improved and one has regressed, there is your reason.

QUOTE (Rowand44 @ Jan 13, 2014 -> 11:01 AM) I hate to get into the Wilson argument again but whether you just look at the stats or watch him play he measures up fantastic against all the "younger" qb's in the league. The only knock on the guy is that he's short, he does everything well though. That measurable gap on stats is closing, fast. You can't tell me watching him play vs. Kap play the two months, he measures up fantastic, or even at all. Let's have this conversation in 12 months and see where those stats are then. Russell Wilson does not take his team up to GB in that weather and win a playoff game, let alone two straight road playoff games.

QUOTE (GoSox05 @ Jan 13, 2014 -> 10:41 AM) I agree. I don't see the excitement around that guy. He can scramble and makes some plays here and there, but he misses a lot of throws. Seattle is good because that defense is great and they have a great running back. Then again when he isn't playing the Packers, Kaepernick also looks average most of the time. I agree with you on Kap, when you look at the numbers removing the GB games, they are average. But what I've seen in him is a steady progression of improvement. He was never a pocket passer and has been asked to learn it begining this year. Each game he continues to get better and reading progressions, making good decisions. On top of that, he seems to have an ability to come from behind (clutch gene) and he is racking up some very impressive playoff wins, especially on the road. He took a lot of heat early in the season, deservedly so after all his off season self promoting, but I give the guy credit for seemingly climbing past that throughout the year.

Russell Wilson has been lights out the last 5 weeks, not so much. He will prove to be the most overrated of the new QB's. He can't see over the line which is why most plays are designed around him breaking left or right to throw. Now that D's have learned to contain on the outside, he hasn't been scrambling and completing many passes. Guy has no doubt been fun at times to watch over the past year given his ability to escape the pocket and make big plays, but the tide is turning.

QUOTE (HickoryHuskers @ Jan 12, 2014 -> 05:39 PM) I don't find either team particularly unlikable. The only part of Seattle I really don't like is Peter Carroll. I like Russell Wilson and their fans aren't terribly obnoxious. Seattle fans are the most obnoxious of all. Take a visit to Seahawks.net or go to a game there when your favorite team is playing them. Get spit on, cursed the entire time. For a team that has never won anything, they are by far the worst and most obnoxious.

QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Jan 12, 2014 -> 05:41 PM) I think S.F. put on quite the show of "obnoxious" on the field today. It worked incredibly well on the Panthers. Might well have won them the game. I don't know how anyone watching that game doesn't realize that Carolina is the team who came out talking trash and playing dirty, especially on that first drive. SF typcially is not the team to come out doing so, but if people get in their face they will not back down. Boldin and Whitner are the biggest talkers on the team, aside from that not much. Carolina came out and played and acted like a team that didn't have any experience and figured they could bully their way to a victory, it backfired. Go back to the SF vs. GB game, where was all the trash talking in that game?

Saints, 49ers, Colts, Broncos. Only fitting that the last game at Candlestick is an NFC Championship game.

QUOTE (BigSqwert @ Jan 6, 2014 -> 10:12 AM) Oh give me a break. You're telling me you've watched every single Seahawk snap this season and you've seen holding on every single play? How is that when the camera doesn't even highlight the secondary on most plays. http://deadsp.in/D8mHlpq

QUOTE (witesoxfan @ Jan 6, 2014 -> 11:53 AM) Those guys came back and played. The Packers lost a lot of guys to season ending injuries - hence, serious injuries. Who are those guys? If a guy comes down with a 3 week injury in week 15, and the team isn't headed to the playoffs, is that classified as serious then since it is season ending? If a guy misses the first 10 weeks of a season and comes back, is that not serious because it wasn't season ending?

QUOTE (GoSox05 @ Jan 6, 2014 -> 11:34 AM) I don't know if there is one site that breaks it down. I look at a couple different sites and go off memory. The 49ers may of had some injuries during the season, but none of them must have been that serious. That team they had yesterday had every starter playing minus Rogers. I'm not knocking the 49ers for that, I think it's impressive. I wish the Packers could do that. Even for just one year. I don't think you are knocking that, but I'm not sure you're argument makes sense. How can you say not having Crabtree isn't serious? Or Manningham? Vernon Davis? Or having your best rushing linebacker out 5 games? Ian Williams (starting NT) out for the season. Starting CB Chris Culliver for the season. I think you losing Rodgers is huge obviously, and bigger than any loss we had so maybe thats why you classify the Packers loss as more significant. But bottom line is they both teams with the exception of Matthews and Rodgers & Wright had everyone going yesterday (obviously Matthews being the bigger loss). Injuries are a good excuse for the 8-7-1 record, but not for yesterday's loss.

QUOTE (GoSox05 @ Jan 6, 2014 -> 11:11 AM) I forgot about Crabtree. I don't know who their number #3 WR is. Vernon Davis missed 1 game this year. Aldon Smith missing time was his own fault. That is still really good health, almost any team would take that. The Packers have 16 players on IR this year. Not including Matthews. Do you know where you can find these lists? I'm curious as the only ones I find are game to game. I know that back in week 5 the Niners had 13 injured players already.

QUOTE (bmags @ Jan 6, 2014 -> 11:02 AM) The Packers game reaffirmed to me that it's important to just get in the playoffs. I really wish Bears could have pulled that off. I'm glad it worked out that SF played in GB yesterday. Despite the cold in GB, there would have been snow in CHI with the cold and that could've led to any result.