JUSTgottaBELIEVE

Complete meltdown, now this is outplaying someone and then losing

Huge choke job if they blow this

Epic fail

QUOTE (DrunkBomber @ Jan 18, 2015 -> 04:51 PM) I cant believe how bad Seattles offense looks Reminds me of last years super bowl. Jump on them early and completely take the other team out of their game. Seattle is not built to win by throwing the ball coming from behind.

QUOTE (pettie4sox @ Jan 18, 2015 -> 04:43 PM) I can't believe the Packers are going to pull this off. Me either. I was totally ready to call it a season and just be happy with the dallas win

HUGE 3 and out

Biggest possession of the game (so far) coming up here

QUOTE (Chilihead90 @ Jan 18, 2015 -> 03:31 PM) The Packers got outplayed, they shouldn't have won last week, but let's not bring up that conversation again, no one wants to hear it. As long as the Colts win it all, I'll be satisfied. Thing is Cowboys got thoroughly outplayed when it mattered most...last 20 minutes of the game.

QUOTE (Chilihead90 @ Jan 18, 2015 -> 02:58 PM) Yep. I can't root for the team that doesn't deserve to be there, and I hate Seattle. Of the 4 teams left, the Colts are the only team I don't hate. Who doesn't deserve to be there? Once again dallas fans think the dez play cost them the win as if it was guaranteed they would have held the packers on the final drive.

QUOTE (MexSoxFan#1 @ Jan 18, 2015 -> 02:46 PM) It's cyclical, I remember when the Packers stunk during the late 70s and all through the 80s until you guys got Favre in the early 90s. The Bears got to the SuperBowl and a NFC title game in the last 10 years. The Bears could do much better of course, but it's not like they've been doormats every year since their last NFL title. Great start for GB I hear ya but it just so happens that in my lifetime the Bears have only made it to one SB which they lost while the packers have been to 3 which they have won 2 (and have had a number of really good chances of getting there in most seasons under Favre and rodgers with the rare exception of a few down years). I guess I'm spoiled

Couldn't have asked for a better start. Well maybe if they would have punched it in on the first two drives but beggars can't be choosers

QUOTE (MexSoxFan#1 @ Jan 18, 2015 -> 02:34 PM) So do the Bears, not recently though, yet Packer fans still chant "the Bears still suck". Did you root fo the Bears in the 06 SuperBowl? Yes, not a manning fan at all. Bears haven't won a super bowl in 30 years and haven't had sustained success since mid 80s. That's a long time

QUOTE (MexSoxFan#1 @ Jan 18, 2015 -> 02:23 PM) Like Packers fans are any better. Unless the other team has a bunch of felons and thugs, rooting for the Packers as a Bears fan is pretty much a no-no. At least green bay has a history of success unlike seattle to back them up

Only 8 teams have won back to back super bowls. All 8 teams were lead by hall of fame QBs. Will Russell Wilson join this elite group? #gopackgo

Also, the Cowboys did have a chance to get the ball back but couldn't stop Green Bay on two different third down plays on the final drive

QUOTE (Chilihead90 @ Jan 12, 2015 -> 01:23 AM) You just contradicted yourself. By "Stretching for the TD" he is making a football move. At that point, it's ruled a catch. According to the reversal, he never showed he had possession, he never stretched or reached for the endzone. And that's horses***. I've seen the replay 100 times now. He is absolutely turning his arm up towards the goalline. If he was just trying to catch the ball, he would have tucked it, not extended outward. Horrible call to end a great game. The NFL is a f***ing joke with some of these calls and rules. For all the Lions fans who said that the horrible call last week ended their season, they've got nothing on this call, as the Cowboys never possessed the ball again, and were losing. Lions were winning and had 2 more possessions. While both were bad calls, one team had good chance to make the call irrelevant. The other team is the Cowboys. And the Cowboys had a damn good chance to win the Superbowl as well. They have beaten 2 of the 3 opponents possibly advancing already this season. People act like the cowboys win that game if the dez catch stands. There is no doubt in my mind rodgers leads the packers to a winning score once they got the ball back at the end of the game. The Cowboys couldn't stop him in the late 3rd and 4th quarters.

QUOTE (LittleHurt05 @ Dec 20, 2014 -> 09:54 AM) I think you gotta go Sanders, Clausen is just such a wild card for Alshon It's tough though because the Broncos stopped throwing the past few weeks and sanders only has like 7 targets the past 2 weeks. At thd end of the day, who has the better chance of scoring? I think they will have similar yardage.

Alshon vs detroit or Emmanuel sanders @ Cincinnati?

Until the roster is finalized, it's hard to give a final prediction but this has the looks of a 82-85 win team. I think KC and Detroit both take a small step back this year. If everything goes right, Sox may be competing for a playoff spot but they need health and career years from a handful of guys

QUOTE (elrockinMT @ Dec 12, 2014 -> 11:53 AM) a real bullpen in 2015 anchored by a real closer will translate into more than 4 wins alone. From this story it seems yhe Debbie Downers are already out I would even say 4 wins is being conservative

QUOTE (StRoostifer @ Dec 12, 2014 -> 11:14 AM) No kidding! Robertson, Duke and LaRoche only amount to four wins? That's harsh. Like others have said, take it with a grain of salt. Shark alone should account for a 4 win improvement. I also think Sanchez is more than capable of putting up 2014 Omar Infante type numbers, which should make put the Sox at league average for the position. Also, IF Flowers is able to replicate his 2014 season, Sox are league average at catcher assuming Nieto shows some improvement. LF is the glaring "black hole" on the current roster but I think will be addressed before opening day.

QUOTE (RockRaines @ Nov 26, 2014 -> 08:22 AM) Yes. Sadly not all Bulls fans can see the future like you can. Future? It's happening right before our eyes

QUOTE (RockRaines @ Nov 26, 2014 -> 08:10 AM) Just sit for three weeks regardless of the fan pressure to play. It's a long season. You could give him 3 months and it will still be the same story. Sadly, not all Bulls fans have come to grips yet that this is the "new" Derrick Rose. Fragile, good player when he plays, but unreliable and no longer a superstar. I have said it before but this is our modern day Penny Hardaway.

QUOTE (Jake @ Nov 13, 2014 -> 09:40 PM) Derrick can't take days off for his sore ankles, that would make him a giant p**** that doesn't care about winning! You saw him walking, he should be playing! I don't know why Rose defenders keep laying out sarcastic comments like this. The uproar earlier this week wasn't about sitting out because of sprained ankles. And to be honest, if he is going to sit out for every ankle, hammy, arm strain/sprain, he will be lucky to play more than 50% of the regular season and/or playoffs. He is a walking injury at this point, modern day penny hardaway. As I have said before, I hope he proves me wrong but I no longer expect consistent contributions from Rose. Anything he provides is a bonus.

QUOTE (Jenksismyb**** @ Nov 12, 2014 -> 05:15 PM) If Cutler had made the Bears relevant immediately and won MVP of the league within 3 seasons, i'm sure he'd be treated like a god in this town. The MVP was great and yet they both have led their teams to the same point of the playoffs - conference finals. Do you not recall how Cutler was treated by media and fans alike for leaving that game early with an injury? He was absolutely blasted. Just like the Bears with cutler, the Bulls aren't winning the title as long as Rose is on the team. Just my opinion of course but I'm no longer a believer of this Derrick Rose. I hope he proves me wrong and makes me a believer once again