-
Posts
60,210 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
12
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by Texsox
-
I've decided to split my allegiance to the White Sox and am in the process of selecting another club. I'm leaning towards the Astros, but am open to suggestions. I've even thought of being one of those spineless wonders and cheering the ScRubs (except against the Sox). Tough call but the Sox are getting me too pissed again.
-
Coming down the stretch he was the only Sox starter that looked like he had some balls and could win a big game. At least we had the 12 mil per year, too bad we couldn't add a year. I'm resigning myself to hoping we have a Dontrel Willis type ready to bust out. Anyone want to takes bets on how fast ncorgbl will be here to chat about the "tub o Goo"?
-
You could give this orgaqnization the top 10 picks every year and we'll piss them away and let other teams take them.
-
Come on you can't expect us to complete with big cities like Kansas City :fyou I promised my self I wouldn't use the :fyou until next season but From me to you JR Colon :fyou Alomar :fyou Sully :fyou Everette :fyou Uribe and just to be the first one, 1 year in advance for Mark :fyou :fyou Look up Maddux to Braves for a f***ing history lesson in Chicago teams pissing away a great pitcher. This is why we can't trust these f***s to rebuild. They'll just piss away our players. Oh, and may I be the first to wish everyone a Merry Christmas
-
s*** PA, you and I have started threads dumber than this. But we knew to pad out post totals by responding Now you gove me a and I reply and we have 2 more posts.
-
I was lucky enought to meet him on two occassions and chat with him for a few minutes. Even on issues we disagreed, I was very impressed on how well thought out his opinion was. I remember when a small controversy errupted aorund him and even the republicans where saying there was no way Simon made a mistake or did anything unethical. That speaks volumes to his integrity. I also liked his tradition on election days. He would go plant a tree so that no matter what happened that day, something good would come out of it.
-
BCS, Why Conf Champs only is bad idea
Texsox replied to Texsox's topic in A and J's Olde Tyme Sports Pub
So then you don't think a team has to win their conference to play in the championship game. -
BCS, Why Conf Champs only is bad idea
Texsox replied to Texsox's topic in A and J's Olde Tyme Sports Pub
I'm not being specific to this season which is why I started a different thread. I believe that just like the basketball playoffs, that the two best teams in the nation can come from the same conference. You are eliminating that possibility. This year there are two Big Ten teams and two Big 12 teams in the top 6. Using Michigan and Ohio as examples; if they had finised 1-2 in the polls would you have argued that one should be tossed out of the championship game and replaced by the 3rd rated team? That only one from the conference, the champion should play? If we make it a rule that to play in the championship game you have to win your last game of the season we will have programs scheduling stiffs to end the season. -
I would rather they play for this year and fold up the team the following year. After 40+ years I've seen to much of not even making the playoffs and then rebuilding. Rebuilding what? That implies we had built something to begin with. This last year should have been the start of 2 or 3 years of contending. Instead, we are trying to rebuild a team that can win 88 games? We've been rebuilding since 1917. There is no building in baseball. You try and sign the best free agents, hope to add a rookie phenom, a couple players have career years, and pray your manager doesn't f*** it up. At the end of season repeat process. Developing players is too hit or miss. Dammit why did you get me started?
-
BeGood is the only one here that could use his real name and we would think it was a screen name
-
He's a Sox fan, he has to know the Dan Ryan. THANKS but ill only let your ride on it if you respect me respect you!? ok, as long as I don't have to like you ~and~ I don't kiss on the lips.
-
My favorite quote "We have to work a little harder in the future to retain players with the resources we have," he said. Work a little harder?! You dumb s***s. How much f***ing work is it to spend a few more dollars? That's the work. Quit using euphanisms work = money
-
I'd love Maddux if time travel was possible. Sorry, he's going to have a losing record next year and be out of the league by 2006.
-
I rarely use AIM but this week I received two IM from list members who somehow found out my ID. I removed that info from this site months ago. Both claimed to be administrators; but my guess it was someone playing a prank.
-
I like your expressway
-
BCS, Why Conf Champs only is bad idea
Texsox replied to Texsox's topic in A and J's Olde Tyme Sports Pub
Would you leave Oklahoma in the playoffs? Texas? Ohio? Or would you just invite the conference winners? Wouldn't there be more controversy with Kansas in the playoffs this year and not Texas and Oklahoma, both ranked by everbody in the top 8? Do you think a playoff would be better that didn't take the top 4 or 8 teams in the nation, regardless if they won their conference championship or not? -
OMG, I'm being sucked into the BeGood vortex, I'm responding to two of his threads in one week. Must try and get out of the spell can't look any more
-
Shouldn't this be in the Sport's Bar or is this Sex, Lies, or Politics[/color]
-
NFLers recieving racist letters
Texsox replied to southsider2k5's topic in A and J's Olde Tyme Sports Pub
right but who do you think released it? My theory is someone has a copy, probably within Em's group, and the peon gets pissed and calls company B and says hey how would you like a copy of Em rapping about liking the president dead? They snatch it up and release it. I don't see Em wanting this released. Notice it only gets those people who don't care for Em upset. His hardcore, loyal not matter what, followers will continue to support him. In fact it may increase his street cred. -
BCS, Why Conf Champs only is bad idea
Texsox replied to Texsox's topic in A and J's Olde Tyme Sports Pub
How can you automatically say that one conference can never have the two best teams in the nation? By limiting the championship game to conference champs only we are saying before they play a single down that no two teams from the same conference can be 1-2 in the nation. Does that make sense logically? It also then makes the assumption that, for example, the winner of the MAC is a stronger team, more worthy of national title hopes, than say Ohio, Texas, or Oklahoma. You just eliminated mid conferences from your equation. Why does the NCAA invite more than 1 team from some conferences into the basketball tourny? Could it be they recognize that the second place team in a conference may be the best team in the nation? How many times have we seen the winner of a b-ball conference tourny is seeded lower than another team in their conference? -
Heads, did you have a doe only permit? Does Illinois still have multiple seasons based on weapon? Interesting thing down here that surprised me at first. When I was is Illinois, it was always possible to find a landowner willing to let you hunt theirland for free or a small cost (meat, work, etc.) In Texas with all this scrub brush, nohing on it land, deer leases are big bucks (no pun intended). A decent lease will run you $2,000 and up. Makes venison a bit pricy. Nice doe
-
Do you get to the island at all?
-
It would be a bad idea if the BCS limited teams in the championship game to just conference winners and here's why: First off you have eliminated the possibility that the top two teams in the country could be in the same conference. The Big 12 and the Big 10 both have 2 teams in the top 6 or 8 this season. It is theoretically possible, if not probable, that someday two teams from the same conference could finish 1-2 in the country. In NCAA basketball they do not put every team from the same conference into the same bracket. It is possible the championship game could be with two teams from the same conference. One of course would not be the conference champion. If the NCAA went to a 8 team playoff and you believe that conference champions only should be eligible to play for the title you would have to toss out Texas and Oklahoma, both top 8 teams. Ohio State would also get tossed. That's 3 of the top 8 out of the playoffs. Would you take the winner of the MAC most years over the 2nd place Big 10 team? Looking back I couldn't see a year that made sense. In prosports you would eliminate the wild card and the Marlins would not be the WS Champs. College football will always have subjective rankings. There is no feasible way to have a 64 team tourney so someone or something (computers) will have to rank subjective factors like quality of wins, quality of schedule, etc. to determine the champions.
-
And you took it as well as you dished it. This is what quality board posting is all about. While I'm not a fan of rap, I did buy The Eminem Show. Very good cd.
-
One day, while working in Mexico, I wish I knew how to say liver. I loaded up a tortilla, added some salsa, thinking it was bistek. Two chews later I discovered it was liver and I hate liver.