Jump to content

Texsox

Admin
  • Posts

    60,004
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    11

Everything posted by Texsox

  1. After we take 2 or 3 from the Cubs it will be so apparent to everyone that JM is a NL style manager that we will surely lose him This is such a terrible loss I edited my sig just for you.
  2. 1) Who will win the series Sox 2) Who will hit more HRs, Corky, Frank, or tie (2 points)? Damn I hate this question! Corky 3) How many errors will the Sox make (4 points)? 2 4) How many runs (including unearned) will Buehrle give up (4 points)? 4 5) How many innings will Colon pitch (5 points)? 6.2 6) How many plate appearances will Konerko get (5 points)? 2 7) Who will lead the Sox in total bases (4 points)? Maggs 8) Will Koch get a save (Y/N) (2 points)? Yes 9) Will the Sox steal a base (Y/N) (2 points)? Yes 10) Who will have more RBIs, Lee, Ordonez, or tie (2 points)? Maggs Tiebreaker: How many K's will Sox batters total? 18
  3. Then R Kelly can come after me and charge me with "slander" (verbal) or "libel" (written) because i'm calling him a RAPIST People like Roman Polanski and R Kelly shouldn't be making 1 penny from their "art" because they are disgusting, cowardly, heartless people. :fyou them. The difference is the Polanski was convicted. You're right, everyone who's guilty gets convicted. What was I thinking? Reading comprehension problem, again, today? You can call Polanski a rapist without someone saying "no he isn't" because he was convicted. R Kelly.. has not yet been, however if there is a God he will be soon. And you're right again, everyone who's convicted is guilty Are you saying that Polanski isn't guilty? Refer to a previous post of mine regarding Polanski for the answer to that. I will have to say that the funniest part of this whole lengthy exchange is Clu's signature... This sure does make a pretty picture. How did we go from E-Lo getting no respect to, well this? just admiring the picture with in a picture infinity effect. Nothing really to add. But then either did a few others How many quotes can we add? A lot Not with the other thread, but with this one. It seems as if something in this thread is keeping it alive. Shall we try to create forum art? The irony of the word rapist perfectly in the center... It is kind of fun until the forum crashes That won't happen... will it..? I hope not. This thing is making me dizzy. And to think it all started with an 8th grader and a question about e-lo
  4. Sorry for the bad edit job. The article is at http://www.suntimes.com/output/sports/cst-...pt-carol19.html
  5. Cubs? Sox? How 'bout the best of both? June 19, 2003 BY CAROL SLEZAK STAFF REPORTER Advertisement Either you're a Cubs fan or a Sox fan, and there's little common ground between you. And that's OK. The city is big enough for both of you. (Long may you bicker.) But there can be only one All-Chicago team, consisting of the best players from the Cubs and Sox. And this is it FIRST BASE *All-Chicago Team: Frank Thomas SECOND BASE *All-Chicago Team: Mark Grudzielanek SHORTSTOP *All-Chicago Team: Alex Gonzalez THIRD BASE *All-Chicago Team: Joe Crede CATCHER *All-Chicago Team: Damian Miller RIGHT FIELD *All-Chicago Team: Magglio Ordonez CENTER FIELD *All-Chicago Team: Corey Patterson LEFT FIELD *All-Chicago Team: Carlos Lee STARTING PITCHING *All-Chicago Team: Esteban Loaiza RELIEF PITCHING *All-Chicago Team: Joe Borowski MANAGERS *All-Chicago Team: Dusty Baker MOST VALUABLE PLAYER *All-Chicago MVP: Mark Prior
  6. Anyone want to write up the questions for this series? Make it official and all.
  7. I always hit quote when I'm quoting.
  8. IMHO Frank's the key this weekend. He had a miserable game today. I'm glad I have caller id if this wekend turns into a disaster. I won't be answering anything long distance
  9. Then R Kelly can come after me and charge me with "slander" (verbal) or "libel" (written) because i'm calling him a RAPIST People like Roman Polanski and R Kelly shouldn't be making 1 penny from their "art" because they are disgusting, cowardly, heartless people. :fyou them. The difference is the Polanski was convicted. You're right, everyone who's guilty gets convicted. What was I thinking? Reading comprehension problem, again, today? You can call Polanski a rapist without someone saying "no he isn't" because he was convicted. R Kelly.. has not yet been, however if there is a God he will be soon. And you're right again, everyone who's convicted is guilty Are you saying that Polanski isn't guilty? Refer to a previous post of mine regarding Polanski for the answer to that. I will have to say that the funniest part of this whole lengthy exchange is Clu's signature... This sure does make a pretty picture. How did we go from E-Lo getting no respect to, well this? just admiring the picture with in a picture infinity effect. Nothing really to add. But then either did a few others How many quotes can we add? A lot Not with the other thread, but with this one. It seems as if something in this thread is keeping it alive. Shall we try to create forum art? The irony of the word rapist perfectly in the center... It is kind of fun until the forum crashes
  10. How would you do that manually? Are you thinking hit quote and then change the code in the quote box?
  11. Then R Kelly can come after me and charge me with "slander" (verbal) or "libel" (written) because i'm calling him a RAPIST People like Roman Polanski and R Kelly shouldn't be making 1 penny from their "art" because they are disgusting, cowardly, heartless people. :fyou them. The difference is the Polanski was convicted. You're right, everyone who's guilty gets convicted. What was I thinking? Reading comprehension problem, again, today? You can call Polanski a rapist without someone saying "no he isn't" because he was convicted. R Kelly.. has not yet been, however if there is a God he will be soon. And you're right again, everyone who's convicted is guilty Are you saying that Polanski isn't guilty? Refer to a previous post of mine regarding Polanski for the answer to that. I will have to say that the funniest part of this whole lengthy exchange is Clu's signature... This sure does make a pretty picture. How did we go from E-Lo getting no respect to, well this? just admiring the picture with in a picture infinity effect. Nothing really to add. But then either did a few others How many quotes can we add? A lot Not with the other thread, but with this one. It seems as if something in this thread is keeping it alive. Shall we try to create forum art?
  12. Then R Kelly can come after me and charge me with "slander" (verbal) or "libel" (written) because i'm calling him a RAPIST People like Roman Polanski and R Kelly shouldn't be making 1 penny from their "art" because they are disgusting, cowardly, heartless people. :fyou them. The difference is the Polanski was convicted. You're right, everyone who's guilty gets convicted. What was I thinking? Reading comprehension problem, again, today? You can call Polanski a rapist without someone saying "no he isn't" because he was convicted. R Kelly.. has not yet been, however if there is a God he will be soon. And you're right again, everyone who's convicted is guilty Are you saying that Polanski isn't guilty? Refer to a previous post of mine regarding Polanski for the answer to that. I will have to say that the funniest part of this whole lengthy exchange is Clu's signature... This sure does make a pretty picture. How did we go from E-Lo getting no respect to, well this? just admiring the picture with in a picture infinity effect. Nothing really to add. But then either did a few others How many quotes can we add? A lot Not with the other thread, but with this one. It seems as if something in this thread is keeping it alive.
  13. Seeing if it's something in my browser or forum settings
  14. The worse was having to listen to Botox announcers
  15. Then R Kelly can come after me and charge me with "slander" (verbal) or "libel" (written) because i'm calling him a RAPIST People like Roman Polanski and R Kelly shouldn't be making 1 penny from their "art" because they are disgusting, cowardly, heartless people. :fyou them. The difference is the Polanski was convicted. You're right, everyone who's guilty gets convicted. What was I thinking? Reading comprehension problem, again, today? You can call Polanski a rapist without someone saying "no he isn't" because he was convicted. R Kelly.. has not yet been, however if there is a God he will be soon. And you're right again, everyone who's convicted is guilty Are you saying that Polanski isn't guilty? Refer to a previous post of mine regarding Polanski for the answer to that. I will have to say that the funniest part of this whole lengthy exchange is Clu's signature... This sure does make a pretty picture. How did we go from E-Lo getting no respect to, well this? just admiring the picture with in a picture infinity effect. Nothing really to add. But then either did a few others How many quotes can we add? A lot
  16. Hey, we split with a really good team. How cool is that? Most everyone would have taken a 2-2 split with the Red Sox a few days ago. Let's win big over the weekend I just set a world record for attitude turn around.
  17. Manuel is a big f***ING MORON. You don't see me swear much but this is ridiculous. How the hell does this guy have a job as a manager? Manuel was ejected And his judgement lives on. DB should have still been in the game-
  18. Good thing he put DB on the bench after going 2-2 JM you are an IDIOT
  19. PK last successfull sac bunt was in 1999
  20. and half never came the stadium looked empty from the start People are working the unemployed go to Cubs games
×
×
  • Create New...