Texsox

The Botox didn't exactly play up to MLB levels either. This game sucked on both sides of the field. The better team found a way to win when they were playing like s***. The differences in games like this are 1. Coaching 2. Attitude 3. Ability to do the little things (like bunting) aka fundementals 4. Luck This season we are 0-4

Last night the ESPN crew discussed the NL and AL Central races. No mention of the Sox. Dibbs handed the division to the Twinkies. I guess we should just stop playing and go home I thought we at least deserved a mention. But at 6-7 games back maybe not. I wouldn't have even minded a WTF happened to the Sox comment.

Last night the ESPN crew discussed the NL and AL Central races. No mention of the Sox. Dibbs handed the division to the Twinkies. I guess we should just stop playing and go home I thought we at least deserved a mention. But at 6-7 games back maybe not. I wouldn't have even minded a WTF happened to the Sox comment.

Too damn hot to be outside this weekend. I'll be listening

Who are these Cubs?

LOL kind of.

I think Frank pointed out that he sucked it up also. And Paul is wrong, according to a graphic on the BoTox feed, he laid down a successful sac bunt in 1999. Notice that we haven't had a player whine about the boos in a while. If things do not turnaround soon the booing is going to stop and be replaced by crickets chirpping.

Good thing Crumbs isn't around running the Bulls, the guy wouldn't have fallen past 7

LOL

RJ needed out of the contract they signed a few years ago and had 4 years left. NASCAR knew they can make more today with a new sponsor than staying with RJ Reynolds. So when RJ Reynolds asked to be let out early NASCAR started their engines. So everyone involved with signing checks on the front and back are happy. Do you think we will see in race cell phone calls to the drivers? Kind of like the cameras in the cars? Perhaps Bubba can call ahead to have some pork rinds ready

After we take 2 or 3 from the Cubs it will be so apparent to everyone that JM is a NL style manager that we will surely lose him This is such a terrible loss I edited my sig just for you.

1) Who will win the series Sox 2) Who will hit more HRs, Corky, Frank, or tie (2 points)? Damn I hate this question! Corky 3) How many errors will the Sox make (4 points)? 2 4) How many runs (including unearned) will Buehrle give up (4 points)? 4 5) How many innings will Colon pitch (5 points)? 6.2 6) How many plate appearances will Konerko get (5 points)? 2 7) Who will lead the Sox in total bases (4 points)? Maggs 8) Will Koch get a save (Y/N) (2 points)? Yes 9) Will the Sox steal a base (Y/N) (2 points)? Yes 10) Who will have more RBIs, Lee, Ordonez, or tie (2 points)? Maggs Tiebreaker: How many K's will Sox batters total? 18

Then R Kelly can come after me and charge me with "slander" (verbal) or "libel" (written) because i'm calling him a RAPIST People like Roman Polanski and R Kelly shouldn't be making 1 penny from their "art" because they are disgusting, cowardly, heartless people. :fyou them. The difference is the Polanski was convicted. You're right, everyone who's guilty gets convicted. What was I thinking? Reading comprehension problem, again, today? You can call Polanski a rapist without someone saying "no he isn't" because he was convicted. R Kelly.. has not yet been, however if there is a God he will be soon. And you're right again, everyone who's convicted is guilty Are you saying that Polanski isn't guilty? Refer to a previous post of mine regarding Polanski for the answer to that. I will have to say that the funniest part of this whole lengthy exchange is Clu's signature... This sure does make a pretty picture. How did we go from E-Lo getting no respect to, well this? just admiring the picture with in a picture infinity effect. Nothing really to add. But then either did a few others How many quotes can we add? A lot Not with the other thread, but with this one. It seems as if something in this thread is keeping it alive. Shall we try to create forum art? The irony of the word rapist perfectly in the center... It is kind of fun until the forum crashes That won't happen... will it..? I hope not. This thing is making me dizzy. And to think it all started with an 8th grader and a question about e-lo

Sorry for the bad edit job. The article is at http://www.suntimes.com/output/sports/cst-...pt-carol19.html

Cubs? Sox? How 'bout the best of both? June 19, 2003 BY CAROL SLEZAK STAFF REPORTER Advertisement Either you're a Cubs fan or a Sox fan, and there's little common ground between you. And that's OK. The city is big enough for both of you. (Long may you bicker.) But there can be only one All-Chicago team, consisting of the best players from the Cubs and Sox. And this is it FIRST BASE *All-Chicago Team: Frank Thomas SECOND BASE *All-Chicago Team: Mark Grudzielanek SHORTSTOP *All-Chicago Team: Alex Gonzalez THIRD BASE *All-Chicago Team: Joe Crede CATCHER *All-Chicago Team: Damian Miller RIGHT FIELD *All-Chicago Team: Magglio Ordonez CENTER FIELD *All-Chicago Team: Corey Patterson LEFT FIELD *All-Chicago Team: Carlos Lee STARTING PITCHING *All-Chicago Team: Esteban Loaiza RELIEF PITCHING *All-Chicago Team: Joe Borowski MANAGERS *All-Chicago Team: Dusty Baker MOST VALUABLE PLAYER *All-Chicago MVP: Mark Prior

Anyone want to write up the questions for this series? Make it official and all.

I always hit quote when I'm quoting.

IMHO Frank's the key this weekend. He had a miserable game today. I'm glad I have caller id if this wekend turns into a disaster. I won't be answering anything long distance

Then R Kelly can come after me and charge me with "slander" (verbal) or "libel" (written) because i'm calling him a RAPIST People like Roman Polanski and R Kelly shouldn't be making 1 penny from their "art" because they are disgusting, cowardly, heartless people. :fyou them. The difference is the Polanski was convicted. You're right, everyone who's guilty gets convicted. What was I thinking? Reading comprehension problem, again, today? You can call Polanski a rapist without someone saying "no he isn't" because he was convicted. R Kelly.. has not yet been, however if there is a God he will be soon. And you're right again, everyone who's convicted is guilty Are you saying that Polanski isn't guilty? Refer to a previous post of mine regarding Polanski for the answer to that. I will have to say that the funniest part of this whole lengthy exchange is Clu's signature... This sure does make a pretty picture. How did we go from E-Lo getting no respect to, well this? just admiring the picture with in a picture infinity effect. Nothing really to add. But then either did a few others How many quotes can we add? A lot Not with the other thread, but with this one. It seems as if something in this thread is keeping it alive. Shall we try to create forum art? The irony of the word rapist perfectly in the center... It is kind of fun until the forum crashes

How would you do that manually? Are you thinking hit quote and then change the code in the quote box?

Then R Kelly can come after me and charge me with "slander" (verbal) or "libel" (written) because i'm calling him a RAPIST People like Roman Polanski and R Kelly shouldn't be making 1 penny from their "art" because they are disgusting, cowardly, heartless people. :fyou them. The difference is the Polanski was convicted. You're right, everyone who's guilty gets convicted. What was I thinking? Reading comprehension problem, again, today? You can call Polanski a rapist without someone saying "no he isn't" because he was convicted. R Kelly.. has not yet been, however if there is a God he will be soon. And you're right again, everyone who's convicted is guilty Are you saying that Polanski isn't guilty? Refer to a previous post of mine regarding Polanski for the answer to that. I will have to say that the funniest part of this whole lengthy exchange is Clu's signature... This sure does make a pretty picture. How did we go from E-Lo getting no respect to, well this? just admiring the picture with in a picture infinity effect. Nothing really to add. But then either did a few others How many quotes can we add? A lot Not with the other thread, but with this one. It seems as if something in this thread is keeping it alive. Shall we try to create forum art?

Then R Kelly can come after me and charge me with "slander" (verbal) or "libel" (written) because i'm calling him a RAPIST People like Roman Polanski and R Kelly shouldn't be making 1 penny from their "art" because they are disgusting, cowardly, heartless people. :fyou them. The difference is the Polanski was convicted. You're right, everyone who's guilty gets convicted. What was I thinking? Reading comprehension problem, again, today? You can call Polanski a rapist without someone saying "no he isn't" because he was convicted. R Kelly.. has not yet been, however if there is a God he will be soon. And you're right again, everyone who's convicted is guilty Are you saying that Polanski isn't guilty? Refer to a previous post of mine regarding Polanski for the answer to that. I will have to say that the funniest part of this whole lengthy exchange is Clu's signature... This sure does make a pretty picture. How did we go from E-Lo getting no respect to, well this? just admiring the picture with in a picture infinity effect. Nothing really to add. But then either did a few others How many quotes can we add? A lot Not with the other thread, but with this one. It seems as if something in this thread is keeping it alive.

Seeing if it's something in my browser or forum settings

The worse was having to listen to Botox announcers

Then R Kelly can come after me and charge me with "slander" (verbal) or "libel" (written) because i'm calling him a RAPIST People like Roman Polanski and R Kelly shouldn't be making 1 penny from their "art" because they are disgusting, cowardly, heartless people. :fyou them. The difference is the Polanski was convicted. You're right, everyone who's guilty gets convicted. What was I thinking? Reading comprehension problem, again, today? You can call Polanski a rapist without someone saying "no he isn't" because he was convicted. R Kelly.. has not yet been, however if there is a God he will be soon. And you're right again, everyone who's convicted is guilty Are you saying that Polanski isn't guilty? Refer to a previous post of mine regarding Polanski for the answer to that. I will have to say that the funniest part of this whole lengthy exchange is Clu's signature... This sure does make a pretty picture. How did we go from E-Lo getting no respect to, well this? just admiring the picture with in a picture infinity effect. Nothing really to add. But then either did a few others How many quotes can we add? A lot