caulfield12

Dadgummmmit, Greg. See, look what happens when we leave Danks in!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

11 runners left on base.....9 walks, 1 HBP, 6 hits. Not so good.

QUOTE (BigEdWalsh @ Jun 11, 2011 -> 07:20 PM) Well, NO GIVING THE F***ING RUN RIGHT BACK!! I saw your post and thought for sure Suzuki homered since the radio feed over the Internet here in the Philippines has a delay sometimes.

You get the feeling that Ozzie will push Danks as far as he can into the 8th inning before he goes to a reliever. Around 100 pitches now.

I guess that's pretty much the definition of a gift run. Ugh. The downside to Quentin and Paulie, those DP balls. Luckily we got bailed out by by the pitcher.

Nice play by Quentin out there. Too bad Rios didn't make the play or we could have cut the runner down at 3rd or kept him from tagging. Why didn't Alex take that one? We need to take out Gonzalez this inning....because we've done ZILCH against the A's bullpen this year in tight games in late innings.

Wow, there's a big surprise...score a run, we give the lead right back. There must be like a 80-85% correlation of not scoring with the bases loaded and giving up a run to the opposition in the subsequent at-bat.

Anyone willing to state with 100% confidence the White Sox will go on to win this game after what's already transpired against Oakland this year?

C'mon Beckham, WE HAVE TO GET A HIT HERE. Okay, the White Sox are officially cursed. There's no other explanation.

Castro won't hit into a DP, Castro won't hit into a DP, Castro won't hit into a DP!!!

DET and Scherzer beating up Michael Pineda, 5-1. DET is now sharing first and officially the team we're chasing, as many expected.

QUOTE (Heads22 @ Jun 11, 2011 -> 06:43 PM) This inning, I would like to learn more about what it would take to own a house, roughly 16,000 square foot, in the Scottsdale area. Dave Wilder still has some of his properties on the market, fwiw. Apparently, Rios has BOTH his left shoulder more turned in AND his hands higher. Those have been the two adjustments Walker is touting to everyone.

So who's our designated closer by committee tonight? Crain, Thornton or Sale? You'd have to go with Matty, but Jesus, if Cliff Pennington comes up again with the winning or tying runner on base, I hope he gets him out or he will be having Aarsdsma-esque nightmares for the rest of the season.

QUOTE (greg775 @ Jun 11, 2011 -> 06:35 PM) How could Lexi not hit a fly ball there? Geezus. Stupid baseball. made to order DP. Fail by a good hitter. Fail. Greg, Lillibridge does his job and reads the same ball that get the lead runner over to 3rd, he's standing on 2nd and you're cheering Alexei for doing his job by not striking out or popping up. Then it's 3-1 with another runner on 3rd with two outs. Totally different situation. I don't blame Alexei. That's arguably two runs (one offensively, one defensively) that he's cost us tonight. The chickens are starting to come home to roost with Lillibridge getting extended play over a long period of time. There was no way he wasn't going to cool down offensively.

C'mon Lillibridge, WAKE UP! Bring back Pierre, haha. Well, I won't go that far. But there's no way it should just be a 2-1 lead...which, of course, will have later consequences against the A's in 2011.

deleted post

The other source of frustration is leading the majors in incurring losses when we've blown numerous games after leading at some point in the 7th/8th/9th innings. If we just had "average" bullpen conversion results this year, we'd be in first place despite Dunn/Rios/Peavy.

At least Ozzie has been smart enough to try Lillibridge over Pierre against a lefty. Unfortunately, it's not very easy to keep shifting him all over the OF and expecting the same stellar defensive play. We probably gave them a run right there they didn't 100% deserve. Although you can't say "Pierre would have had it" this year, that's for sure.

Hopefully the give that error to Castro. No way Lillibridge deserves it for the runner getting to 2nd. But he misplayed it....perhaps he lost it in the lights since he's not used to playing LF very much this season. Definitely had a play on that with the right read off the bat.

Matsui not winning any admiration from Bob Melvin there not getting the runner over to 3rd...considering one of the changes was the vow to play Hideki every game not instead of platooning him.

QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Jun 11, 2011 -> 05:36 PM) Except for the great years, you're completely right, never good enough to become great except for the great years. So we can count stretches of 1977, 1983, 1990, 93/94, 2000 and 2005. Or do you think the 2003, 2006, 2008 and 2010 teams would also fall into that "great" category? The basic premise of that comment is we've never had enough Top 5-10 picks in the first round of the draft to really find any superstar players since the Ventura/Thomas/McDowell/Alex Fernandez selections over 2 decades ago.

QUOTE (Brian @ Jun 10, 2011 -> 08:01 PM) Thor as well and Bridesmaids is getting good reviews everywhere I look. This summer has already been better than the past two summers. Thor has done fairly well, but it hasn't been a HUGE box office success. X-Men might be a very good movie, but the fans simply haven't supported it. Fast Five and Pirates' worldwide grosses (domestic has been disappointing) make the summer better, but Kung Fu Panda's a big miss as well. Bridesmaids is one of the few breakout movies that hasn't lost 50-60% of its audience every weekend after the front-loaded openings.

What is our batting average this year with the bases loaded? It SEEMS like it must be something like .180 or so.

QUOTE (iamshack @ Jun 11, 2011 -> 04:58 PM) It's frustration that happens with every single loss. Gain a sense of f***ing perspective. Here we go again. I've listened or watched pretty much every White Sox game since the mid 1980's. The problem is that I have TOO MUCH PAST White Sox perspective that it colors my perception today. I'll just have to learn to be content with 77-85 win teams for the next decade and 2nd/3rd place usually, I suppose. That's far better than the Sox averaged in the 50's, 60's, 70's and 80's. YAY! GO SOX! We're neither very good nor bad enough to ever become great, either.

QUOTE (Jake @ Jun 11, 2011 -> 02:08 PM) Normally, those insurance policies only come into effect when they player doesn't play at all. Sometimes the player has to never play again. Nobody KNOWS for sure, unless they work for the White Sox. Maybe somebody should call into Ranger's post-game show sometime and ask him directly and see if he'll give any type of answer or just avoid it. The only thing I do remember precisely is that David Wells in 2001, when he missed over half the season that year....we received between $4-4.5 in compensation from that specific insurance package, I think it was Lloyd's of London which had issued the policy. For example, Albert Belle's contract. I would be curious what happened with that in terms of any insurance.