Jump to content

caulfield12

Members
  • Posts

    89,648
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    27

Everything posted by caulfield12

  1. QUOTE (justBLAZE @ Dec 6, 2010 -> 10:08 AM) What no Lillibridge?! If DeAza tears it up in ST, maybe. But since Lilly can play CF at least and has more positional versatility (and so does Omar at age 44-45), they seem to prefer those two. DeAza seems like he needs to be getting regular PT to be effective, imo. In ideal world, they would jettison Teahen's contract, but that's not possible and KW isn't going to eat another $3-6 million because they think Teahen can make himself valuable (to at least one other team) again.
  2. I guess Gartrell played fairly well in the AFL or Winter Ball that he's now considered a legit option? The funny thing is that nobody ever would have thought one year ago that the contracts for Derek Jeter with the Yankees (3 years with 4th as option) would have been remotely similar...I still don't believe the White Sox are crazy enough to go 3 years and $51 million for Konerko, but it's crazy to think that those are the numbers that will come in and that 25% of the fanbase will actually be somewhat pleased with that signing. Maybe after Werth, those numbers make sense, but holy hell, they scare me going down the line 2-3 years. Part of it is the legitimate fear that Viciedo is a break-out star and goes on to become an All-Star and Paulie breaks down and there's nothing close to a replacement bat in the system with that impact.
  3. Do you really think Morel is capable of hitting 20-30 homers per year? That's a bit of a stretch...to even his most ardent fans? Whether Morel can develop into a "clutch" performer like a Uribe or Crede at the plate, time will tell.
  4. The White Sox got back $4-4.5 million for David Wells in 2001 and he pitched over 100 innings that year. I think the insurance payouts have changed greatly though....I wonder how much the insurance outlay would be for the contracts of Konerko, Dunn, Rios, Peavy and Buehrle on a yearly basis. Certainly not cheap.
  5. QUOTE (Marty34 @ Dec 5, 2010 -> 08:45 PM) Another thing to consider about this signing is that it may behoove the Sox to trade for another pitcher ASAP. Fairly certain that Boras will get Jackson a big contract somewhere else after next year. On the other hand, you knew with all the movement in his early career, Jackson would like to stick around with one organization for 2-3 seasons if he feels really comfortable. Otherwise, he will end up being another Miguel Batista, albeit with much more talent and stuff...just bouncing around from place to place.
  6. QUOTE (SoxFan562004 @ Dec 5, 2010 -> 07:41 PM) i think this is exactly what it is. If Nats offer was comparable to Bos, Philly, or another "winning" team he would have gone there, they probably had to blow him out of the water with a deal. It is also a bit reminiscent of the Royals throwing (for them) huge money at Gil Meche and Jose Guillen. You have to overpay if you're not a competitive team, in order to get some credibility. But my god, that contract is 4 years longer than almost any sane GM in the game would have given. This contract, in some ways, might end up having more repercussions than the Hicks/A-Rod deal. To put it in perspective, that's more money on Werth than the franchise has spent in 20 years COMBINED on free agents. My jaw dropped when I saw those numbers for a borderline All-Star player, but certainly no superstar. I actually think Ordonez's deal with the Tigers was much better than this one will end up.
  7. QUOTE (knightni @ Dec 5, 2010 -> 09:50 AM) The Nats might need a power bat. I bet that their minors have a few guys that the Sox would want. Do you really think after the bad blood last year that Rizzo and KW are likely to make a trade now? Especially after we just signed Dunn? If I'm another team, I might just take my chances with Jermaine Dye on an incentive-laden deal versus giving up young talent for Quentin...maybe there are a lot of NL teams willing to put him in the OF, but I don't think so. A lot of the turf stadiums are gone, but the NL has always been a home for more athletic outfielders until recent years. Plus, they really have to get some indications on Zimmerman and Strasburg...and even to start putting together a Harper timetable for ETA, before they start making significant monetary commitments going forward.
  8. So our best options at 1B after Konerko are DLee, Pena, LaRoche and Chris Davis (maybe) in that order OR Viciedo/Teahen platoon
  9. As long as the plan isn't for Andruw Jones to be the everyday RFer and to just boot Quentin's salary off the payroll for a few B prospects. And newcomer Edwin Jackson is owed $13.35 million over the next two seasons, although that might be a tough contract to deal. Phil Rogers wrote this today. One, it's crazy to think they couldn't trade Jackson if they really wanted. Part two of the craziness, I only thought we had him for 2011 at $8.5 million or whatever it is. Then someone else had written that we have him for two more years....if we want and offer him arbitration before 2012, but I was almost positive he was a FA. Certainly, I think Rogers is wrong here in today's article.
  10. Is there even such a thing as midget porn? Well, with both Konerko and Dunn, there's no place for Viciedo, unless he plays RF and Quentin is dealt. I suppose there's a chance he goes back to 3B again if Morel's bat fails. We really don't want to see Teahen at 3B or RF, so it seems that KW has no choice but to do another Linebrink-esque deal to get him off the roster and away from the playing field.
  11. Werth's going to be simply too expensive (and too many years), same with Crawford. But KW definitely has a Plan B in mind, namely Lee/Pena/LaRoche...obviously he realized not having a back-up plan at DH when they let Thome go was a complete disaster, and they couldn't fill that hole at the trading deadline either. Agree that Werth would be the better sign, but not at those figures. For some reason, he scares me a bit coming to the AL. He was originally a big bust and then he really found himself later in his career, not unlike Raul Ibanez.
  12. How did trading Linebrink free up $4 million....? Wouldn't it be just $2 million saved that could be reallocated theoretically? Or did I miss something?
  13. Trading Jackson leaves us with Sale as our fourth starter and no rotation until Peavy comes back, if/when he does. Pitching is obviously the most valuable commodity still in baseball, if we trade Jackson/Floyd/Danks we have to get younger/affordable/high potential impact pitching back, particularly due to the dearth of talent in our own system. Unless we bring back Garcia or sign someone like J. Washburn or Jeremy Bonderman for insurance.
  14. I'm in the camp that we have to replace that RH reliever somehow...beyond even Putz. I have no faith in our minor league system, and Sergio Santos is still a bit of a wild card. I'd love to believe he can post the same numbers (overall) as 2010 but I'm not entirely buying into it quite yet. Of course, if we're committed to carrying a $120-130 million budget the next 3 years, great, bring back Konerko. But I would still prefer only commitment of a 2 year contract with a 3rd year club option, and there are teams out there that might be willing to give 3-4 guaranteed years coming off 2010. It's great right now to think we HAVE to have Paulie back, but it might not be so great a year or two down the line when KW and JR are bringing up budgets again and lower fan support and having to pare back the roster like we almost did in 2010 before catching fire. Of all the contracts over the last decade, Konerko's ranks up there with having had its moments where it seemed a ball and chain around the organization's neck. Other than Konerko, the only other ones that come to mind immediately are Contreras, MacDougal, Linebrink and now, apparently, Teahen and Pierre to a lesser extent. Peavy, I suppose...that has to be the greatest concern going forward. If you knew he was going to be healthy or tradeable at some point, I would take on Konerko's 3 years, but between Peavy and Rios, it's quite a risk to have another player at those numbers.
  15. QUOTE (Kenny Hates Prospects @ Dec 3, 2010 -> 09:15 AM) I like Borbon because he should be available - he's being squeezed out of Texas' OF and they have prospects with much higher ceilings already on his tail. His ceiling is probably Pierre with better pop, but that's valuable for 5 years of control. I don't think he's like massively valuable, just a nice fit. Putting him in LF with Pierre in another uniform and us not having to pay anything (who knows if this is possible, just me guessing) would give us the money to sign a reliever. So I've put that forth a couple times. The above scenario I proposed would be pretty much impossible, because the Rangers would probably offer just as much as we would, and why would Lee stiff them and come here? I'm not saying we'd ever get Lee, just that it's kind of crazy to examine the possibilities that exist when you have a payroll like that. It's kind of ---- weird. But I like it. The thing that really sucks is if Mitchell had stayed healthy and continued progressing in 2010 and KW didn't get desperate with Pierre and Teahen, we might actually be able to talk about a name like Cliff Lee realistically. Then again, when we had Contreras/Buehrle/Javy/Garland/Garcia in 2006 our rotation was even more expensive.
  16. QUOTE (Rooftop Shots @ Dec 3, 2010 -> 09:03 AM) Laughed when I saw this, but at the same time, on the serious side, you brought up a great point! You wonder if that is crossing his mind to some extent? Not sure how old he is, but if you keep waiting in life to live out your passions, you have to go "ALL IN" before your time and opportunities run out. Not sure how his health is, but at his age, you wonder how much more waiting he can deal with. Regardless how much he spends, he and his family will still live comfortably, so I agree, why not totally jump in for 2 more years? If we make it...Great! If not, at least he can look back and have no "What If's!!!" Jerry wants another W.S. It makes me wonder that if he realized that the only way it will have the best chance to come is to unload the bank? esprcially with Minny and Det breathing on our necks! if that's the case...........I will be reading Soxtalk like crazy for updates when the winter meetings start. If we're "ALL IN" then what does next week bring in? It's not baseball season yet, but this has the makings for a possible best ever enjoyable hot stove season. Or a very boring one. It could be simply Konerko/Lee/Pena OR sticking Viciedo/Teahen out there... Looking for one or two "undervalued" bullpen arms for bounceback years like Politte/Hermanson Trying to package Morel/Flowers/Viciedo/Quentin and Danks/Floyd/Jackson for am impact 3B/DH/RF...while they're throwing money around, they might as well overpay for Adrian Beltre and really go "all in." Then the ongoing dumping of Teahen/Linebrink/Pierre conversations as well.
  17. QUOTE (3E8 @ Dec 3, 2010 -> 08:44 AM) We would lose another pick if we signed Soriano I would say the chances are higher that Roberto Hernandez or Takatsu come back to the Sox. Or the Japanese closer with the M's....which are about 0.001%
  18. QUOTE (Kenny Hates Prospects @ Dec 3, 2010 -> 07:18 AM) IMO Danks + Buerhle to Texas for Holland + Borbon + prospects Dump Pierre for nothing, send the Dodgers cash with him Sign Lee away from the Yankees Danks + Mark + Pierre = $25M Lee + Holland + Borbon = $24M Never going to happen, but with this kind of payroll it would actually be doable. Playoff rotation: Lee Gm 1 Peavy Gm 2 Floyd Gm 3 Jackson Gm 4 (this is especially hilarious because he may actually have the most dominant stuff on the staff, and he's 4th) Holland = emergency starter/third lefty in the pen behind Thornton and Sale We'd win everything. You really seem to have an obsession with Borbon, lol. I guess that's better than the other man crush someone has on G. Parra of the D-Backs. Or G. Blanco. I can't imagine having Lee and a healthy Peavy in the same rotation. I also can't imagine trading Danks and Buehrle in the same move...unless the Rangers are suddenly swimming in cash, they would never even consider that one. One thing would be for sure, it would be the final change of guard with Jenks/Buehrle/Paulie gone and amazingly a catcher as the only one hanging on 6 years later from that World Series roster.
  19. By ESPNChicago.comKeith Law reacts to the Adam Dunn signing by the Chicago White Sox, saying that they get a huge upgrade at designated hitter, a position where production was severely lacking last season. But the contract likely will cover the 31-year-old's first declining years, making his long-term impact a bit of a question.
  20. QUOTE (Kalapse @ Dec 2, 2010 -> 11:16 PM) + $400K Castro + $3M+ Danks + $2.25M Floyd + $500K Linebrink + $1M Peavy + Tony Pena salary increase + $2M Pierre + ~$1.8M Quentin + $1.65 Ramirez + $2.3M Rios + $2.5M Teahen + $750K Thornton Our payroll is at about $98.55M right now not counting Pena, Quentin or Danks and assuming Dunn will be paid $14M in 2011 and Pierz will get $4M in 2011. Is that counting Viciedo's money too?
  21. I honestly never thought we'd see another $115-120 million dollar roster under JR anytime soon after the 09/10 disappointments. Surprising, to say the least.
  22. QUOTE (jphat007 @ Dec 2, 2010 -> 10:47 PM) Nothing that KW said today indicates to me that they are planning to trade anyone. It sounds like KW wants to sign PK, sign AJ and sign a bullpen guy and see what happens. Let's just hope so. I'm still a bit scared with Teahen/Morel at 3B, Viciedo (right now) as the DH/1B...and Sale/Thornton as the closer, but it's 100% better than 24 hours ago in terms of not being a completely bleak and boring offseason.
  23. QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Dec 2, 2010 -> 10:44 PM) Huh? They're making AJ a starting pitcher? No, I simply meant the SUPPOSED strain on the payroll of adding $20+ million nobody had foreseen over the last 3-4 months AND bringing back Konerko? There's just no way that ALL fits together without SOMEONE (besides Teahen/Linebrink/Pierre) leaving the roster. Most likely, it would have to be one of those three pitchers, it's the only move. Not saying it would be logical for JR/KW to do it...they have to ride out this "all in" philosophy through 2011. Trading any of those 3 with the existing questions about Peavy or Sale as a starter would be asking for the likes of KSU Carlos and Arnie Munoz, Mike Porzio, Felix Diaz, Sean Tracey and Jon Adkins as the 5th.
  24. http://www.chicagobreakingsports.com/2010/...whats-next.html Probably has been posted already and I didn't take the time to read it. Has anyone heard this idea of Anthony Carter being the closer? I could understand if it was Sale, but Carter? This is really getting interesting, with AJ back into the fold, that undoubtedly means Floyd/Danks/Jackson (one of three) are gone and that Sale's back in the rotation picture. Or they're bringing back Garcia and tempting fate. But it's incredibly dangerous to rely on Peavy and Sale as 2/5ths of the rotation...and assuming they'll hold up the entire season without bumps in the road along with way. Viciedo at 1B/DH is still possible, sharing time with Dunn. Or they could package Viciedo, Morel and force someone to take the contracts of Linebrink/Teahen and MAYBE Pierre along with those two guys. Another idea is ditching Quentin, but that seems more unlikely based on the play of Danks and health questions surrounding Mitchell. I really don't see them going out and getting an established closer. KW learned his lesson with Koch. No way they give $30-36 million and 3 years to someone like Soriano. I do think there are still serious concerns about going into 2010 with BOTH Morel and Viciedo in the line-up. One of them, but not two rookies, maybe I'm wrong and severly underestimating Morel's bat, which I'm projecting at a 675ish OPS next year.
×
×
  • Create New...