Jump to content

T R U

Members
  • Posts

    12,529
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    5

Everything posted by T R U

  1. QUOTE (Jordan4life @ Jul 8, 2010 -> 11:54 AM) This is all worthless anyway. Lebron joins the Heat and he never sniffs a scoring title or MVP for the rest of his career. He may only average 24 ppg but hed prolly have 15 assists per game
  2. QUOTE (RockRaines @ Jul 8, 2010 -> 11:53 AM) I bet they do. I bet they do next season.
  3. QUOTE (Jenksismyb**** @ Jul 8, 2010 -> 11:50 AM) Yeah, and he's won how many titles? And been to how many finals? One? I'm not the one arguing that the league is over for the next 6 years. They'd be a contender, sure. But no guarantee. Hes won no titles because hes been ALONE.. that's the point here, he wont be alone he will be with Wade and Bosh.. LeBron by himself is good enough for 60+ wins.. now add Wade and Bosh to that team..
  4. QUOTE (sircaffey @ Jul 8, 2010 -> 11:46 AM) And not knowing whether I have a job in the future. I'll take the money. I'll live in South Beach in the off season. As hard as this is to believe, some people really would give up some money to win a Championship
  5. QUOTE (Jenksismyb**** @ Jul 8, 2010 -> 11:43 AM) You're an idiot (with respect). Again, no one is claiming (at least i'm not) that they're not a contender. You're making the ridiculous argument that they win a title each year through 2016. One injury and that team is screwed. One injury and they are screwed? Has LeBron not won 60+ games the last two years by himself? If one gets hurt, they go from being a crazy video game team to a really good team.. oh no
  6. QUOTE (Jenksismyb**** @ Jul 8, 2010 -> 11:38 AM) I think you're wrong here. No one of significance is going to go from making a couple million a season to what, like 800k, just for the chance to win a title, especially if there's a potential lockout. Youre right, no one of significance is going to do that.. but role players and those certain pieces you need WILL be willing to do that.. They would already have the star power, the bench and role players would most certainly take those cuts to get a title..
  7. QUOTE (Chi Town Sox @ Jul 8, 2010 -> 11:35 AM) If they got Bosh instead of Boozer would that have brought them closer? Yes because getting Bosh would have netted them one of LeBron or Wade
  8. QUOTE (sircaffey @ Jul 8, 2010 -> 11:33 AM) The Bulls still have $17 mil in available cap space. We ain't done yet. I don't think there is anyone else out there, not including LeBron, that is going to push the Bulls past any of those teams..
  9. QUOTE (Rowand44 @ Jul 8, 2010 -> 11:32 AM) Because they'll literally have no money left if that happens. They will find a way to make it work out
  10. QUOTE (SoxFan1 @ Jul 8, 2010 -> 11:27 AM) Except the Bulls DID get something that improved their team quite a bit. And also because it's factual. Miami will be really, REALLY good with the big 3. But they won't coast to 5 straight titles. You NEED role players. They literally have NONE. And like someone else mentioned, those Boston teams were some of the best defensive teams. The Bulls aren't any closer to a title than they were last season.. Boozer is a nice player and all, but they aint gettin to the finals anytime soon as teams like Orlando, Miami, and Boston are still better than them even without knowing where LeBron is going.. you might add Cleveland or New York to that list too, who knows until tonight.. Why does everyone assume its just going to be LeBron, Wade, Bosh and crap? There will be some people who will find a way to get on that team to get themselves a ring.. its not going to be the Bigger 3 and then a handful of guys from off the street..
  11. QUOTE (whitesoxfan101 @ Jul 8, 2010 -> 11:21 AM) The only "morons" are the people that think Miami is just going to coast to the next 5 titles if they get LeBron. Nah, ide definitely say its the people who are sour that the Bulls didn't get anything out of this offseason and don't want to see LeBron and Co. own the league for the foreseeable future..
  12. QUOTE (whitesoxfan101 @ Jul 8, 2010 -> 11:14 AM) It's not good enough to beat the Lakers. Even the old farts in Boston will be tough if they don't have body parts fall off before the playoffs. Why do people keep saying this? The Lakers struggled against a Boston team who NO ONE gave any credit to here, now all of the sudden its different? If Miami gets LeBron they will be the best team in the league next year.. anyone who disagrees is either a bitter Bulls fan or a moron..
  13. QUOTE (sircaffey @ Jul 8, 2010 -> 11:11 AM) I hope LBJ goes to Miami. It'd be pretty funny for a guy who could have been the best that ever played, go be a glue guy for Wade. I get a lot of enjoyment from that for some reason. Yeah and im sure hell care about that too when hes looking at his handful of championship rings
  14. QUOTE (fathom @ Jul 7, 2010 -> 01:56 PM) Is LeBron going to be announcing from Vince McMahon's house? Yes, and I feel a LeBron heel turn coming where he trashes Cleveland and says he never loved them
  15. QUOTE (Jordan4life @ Jul 7, 2010 -> 12:36 PM) Unless the Lakers get Chris Paul or Dwight Howard there's nothing they could do. Lebron goes to Miami and it's curtains for the rest of the league. And its not even close
  16. QUOTE (Soxbadger @ Jul 7, 2010 -> 12:29 PM) I guess then the NBA shouldnt have a season because Miami is going to win the title. If Lebron goes to Miami, Ill gladly take the field. My guess is that Miami would not be favorites against the field. And ide say you're guess would be wrong.. they would be the favorites hands down
  17. I look at it like this LeBron with very little around him was good enough to win 60+ games the last two years.. but give him two more stars, Wade AND Bosh.. that team would set the all time season wins record..
  18. QUOTE (Soxbadger @ Jul 7, 2010 -> 12:24 PM) I actually dont think Wade/Bosh/Lebron match up that well against the Lakers or potentially other teams in the West. They have no defensive big man. One of Lebron/Wade would primarily take over ball handling, and you just may have a team that wins 70+ games, but against the best team could lose 4 out of 7. Even Boston's line up would give them some trouble. You're crazy.. It took game 7 for the Lakers to beat this Celtics team with Ray Allen no showing half the series and an over the hill KG.. and you think they would beat Wade/LeBron/Bosh? Theres no way, it doesnt matter who the other two starters are on that team.. they would be trampling people..
  19. QUOTE (StrangeSox @ Jul 7, 2010 -> 12:21 PM) The odds of a Wade/Lebron/Bosh team not winning any championships (with them remaining healthy) would have to be ridiculously low. They would win the title next season, im almost sure of that..
  20. QUOTE (Steve9347 @ Jul 7, 2010 -> 12:15 PM) Woj has been careful to release any bulls***, and he said this morning that LeBron is not coming to Chicago, and that it's down to Cleveland or Miami. Thus, I have zero hope. I wouldn't believe any of that stuff.. No one knows what LeBron is going to do, nothing is getting leaked from him.. its all speculation, and why wouldn't the main speculation right now be him staying in Cleveland or going to Miami? Doesn't mean the Bulls are out of it yet..
  21. QUOTE (Steve9347 @ Jul 7, 2010 -> 12:07 PM) Yeah, why play against them when he can play WITH them? Even if he doesn't I like LeBron with the Bulls and LeBron with the Knicks better than Wade and Bosh in Miami.. LeBron comes off as very competitive and you can tell how much he cares about winning.. hes gotta know that going back to Cleveland right now isn't going to get him any closer to a title..
  22. With Wade and Bosh in Miami now, I dont understand how LeBron can go back to Cleveland.. they got no chance with the way the East is shaping up so far
  23. Anyone else see the highlight of Vicente Padilla throwing two curveballs I guess, the first was 55 MPH and the 2nd was 51 MPH
  24. T R U

    Films Thread

    QUOTE (Steve9347 @ Jul 6, 2010 -> 12:35 PM) Also, I find it crazy that people are still using Web-browsers that do not contain spell checkers. YOU SAID THIS ON FACEBOOK
  25. QUOTE (StrangeSox @ Jul 6, 2010 -> 07:12 AM) There was a point to that though. It was Marston trying to settle down and lead that mundane rancher life. I understand there was a point to it, it was just really boring and I could have done without it..
×
×
  • Create New...