hi8is

come to think of it, im not sure if this is working: a) URL FROM A VALID ENTRY CONFORMATION PAGE: ***outfield.mlbcom***/mlb/events/all_star/y2003/mlb_final_vote_thankyou.html?FORM_CODE=mlb_allstar2003_ballot&partnerId=mlb&[email protected]&zip=54915&dob_mm=8&dob_dd=10&dob_yyyy=1962&nlopt=yes&al=123245&x=68200312414546&z=ed54ffee78412ffd6b61e61986a46d22&ui=53559 B) URL FROM A ENTRY CONFORMATION PAGE FROM OUR METHOD OF VOTING: ***outfield.mlbcom***/mlb/events/all_star/y2003/mlb_final_vote_thankyou.html?FORM_CODE=mlb_allstar2003_ballot&partnerId=mlb&[email protected]&zip=54915&dob_mm=8&dob_dd=10&dob_yyyy=1962&nlopt=&al=123245&nl=132961&x=&y=&z= NOTICE THIS DECREPENCY? a)x=68200312414546&z=ed54ffee78412ffd6b61e61986a46d22&ui=53559 B) x=&y=&z= with our method of voting, there apears to be no numbers in these fields... now, does this mean its not a valid vote? I DONT KNOW this was just something i noticed

come to think of it, im not sure if this is working: a) URL FROM A VALID ENTRY CONFORMATION PAGE: http://outfield.mlb.com/mlb/events/all_sta...a46d22&ui=53559 B) URL FROM A ENTRY CONFORMATION PAGE FROM OUR METHOD OF VOTING: http://outfield.mlb.com/mlb/events/all_sta...132961&x=&y=&z= NOTICE THIS DECREPENCY? a)x=68200312414546&z=ed54ffee78412ffd6b61e61986a46d22&ui=53559 B) x=&y=&z= with our method of voting, there apears to be no numbers in these fields... now, does this mean its not a valid vote? I DONT KNOW this was just something i noticed

LETS STEP THIS UP A NOTCH!!!!! i say, everyone vote using this method for at least 2 HOURS for today and tomarrow.... anyone who is down, respond to this thread.... IM IN RIGHT THE f*** RIGHT NOW.... TODAY - 12:40 to 2:40 pm pacific time! HOW TO VOTE 50 TIME IN 1 MINUTE! "This was posted by Bucktown on WSI! Go here: http://www.theweiders.com/mlbvote.htm Keep voting and then clicking back (or press backspace or ALT LEFT ARROW). Everytime you click back a new validation is entered for you. Keep repeating it! It WORKS! "

how do you run this script

i must have voted at least 20 times today a lone " By: Trevor Caesar Lord of the flies and original sin Are humans naturally good or naturally evil? 1good---------------------------10bad Humans are “naturally” In lord of the flies, the author tells a story about a group of 14-year-olds whom crash on a deserted island. They then do not have the constraints of their previous society and form new constraints. This time they end up doing many things that are conventually viewed as wrong. One could say that this in fact proves that humans are inherently bad because there was the “capability” and “capacity” to do evil. The bible also refers to this idea when man is said to have original sin. The people who wrote “the word of God” came to the conclusion and conception that people are naturally bad. I do not know the exact reasons as to why they came to such conclusions yet I would assume that it had something to do with the current conditions of their society. Even Jesus Christ noticed that people were evil. He was there to spend time with the people who were in fact sick. He wanted to heal them by showing them God. Jesus believed that people have the capacity to be good. In both the lord of the files and religious texts, examples at first look it might appear that this is a warrant for the side of a bad nature of man. However, when these examples are looked at under a closer light they show themselves closer to the side of an empty nature. If an infant is born, the first infant ever…. And all that is in exanstance is grass… then the infant will then be IS grass because it is what he knows. Replace the word grass with good or bad….. and I think you will see what I am trying to communicate…. Humans are naturally nothing… they are nothing but a vast capacity…. The world they are born into… the experiences they see and the care they receive and guidance they receive will then determine what their nature will be in moments that have yet to exist."

mlb gameday is showing that we have stranded 21

alright carlos, get a hit!

alright, and we start the inning off pretty nicely, come on everett!

ive been forgeting these last 2 games to add a bit of the soxs new good luck charm: my pessimism =) THEY f***IN SUCK THEY WILL NEVER WIN THIS GAME!!!!! THE RAYS WILL SCORE MORE!!!! AND THE SOX WILL NOT GET ANOTHER HIT, EXPECIALLY BACK TO BACK HOME RUNS!!!! MUAHHAHA

kochs pitching=gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay

i read it on the www.chisox.com board

The Orioles rejected the White Sox's recent offer of first baseman/DH Paul Konerko for potential free-agent righthander Sidney Ponson, and the talks between the teams are currently dormant. Konerko, 27, isn't a great fit for the Orioles, who already have too many first-base/DH types. He is also earning $6.25 million this season, $8 million in 2004 and $8.75 million in 2005 -- and would receive an extra $500,000 in each of the final two years if he is traded. That's a steep price for a player who has struggled all season, and the Orioles would almost want the White Sox to attach a prospect to any deal. Scouts from both the Cardinals and Astros attended Ponson's most recent start in Baltimore. Both teams face budgetary restrictions and would likely want the Orioles to assume the remainder of Ponson's $4.25 million salary in exchange for higher-caliber prospects. ... _ I read that rigth now..

yeah, me too.... paulie will come back but i think in our situation, pitching is more important.

"One other thing: The White Sox still might not be done. In essence, they made both of these trades without adding payroll. Their next target is Orioles pitcher Sidney Ponson, a potential free agent in whom they have had longstanding interest. The teams have not had recent discussions, but the Orioles are one of the few teams willing to accept big contracts in deals, and they might be willing to take on Paul Konerko through 2005 if the White Sox attached a prospect. " read this on sportingnew.com

we are all here gathered together waiting for new posts to be made and wanting more and more sox baseball.... ive never felt like this as a sox fan.... it feels like december 24th as a kid heh heh heh

thanks mucho spiral out, keep goin!

ive been hearing refrence to the source and the score... are there websites that i can access for these two sox info sources? peace

ahhh yeah! remember my pessimesm... i said frank WONT hit another homer haha works again from now on ill just refer to myself as the pessimistic asshole hgaahha WHITE SOX WINNER!!!!!!!!!!!!!! START OF THINGS TO COME!!!!!!!!! f*** YEas~

i am in complete and utter disbelief!

ok, cant forget the sox new good luck charm... my pessimism... THERE GONNA BLOW IT!!! OUR BULLPEN WILL NOT HOLD THEM AT 5 AND WE WILL NOT SCORE 4 OR MORE RUNS IN THESE LAST 4 INNINGS>... FRANK WILL NOT GO DEEP AGAIN@!!!! MAUAHhAh

KC is winning 6 - 1 in the 3rd gurrr

5 - 4 GOOD GUYS... wtg maggs... lets go everret

for real this time... gotta go with my main man big hurt frank thomas!

we gave them a list of 8 minor leauge players to pick from looks like they get to pick 3... one from AAA and 2 from the lower levels and it looks like niel cotts is NOT on the list and jon raunch is also NOT on the list just what i heard thou and i also heard that they will chose who they want by the deadline 7/31/03

this earily and almost 20 people in the boards... wow.... amazing..... soxs makin some noise for 2 hours now, my employer has paid me to surf the net.... fun... to bad they make me get up at 3:45 am... what kinda stuff are you all up to today? peace