QUOTE (fathom @ Sep 7, 2012 -> 09:52 PM)
I hate seeing Reed here. Should have been Myers, as let's face it, Reed's barely surviving out there of late.
Yep. RV calls Reed on because he thought we'd score. Just awful.
QUOTE (Noonskadoodle @ Sep 7, 2012 -> 09:49 PM)
Golden chance pissed away...
Hitters, bench and manager exposed. What a joke. Baseball gods will punish them now.
QUOTE (fathom @ Sep 7, 2012 -> 09:49 PM)
Yep, severely outmanaged that inning. Again, why is Lopez batting 2nd? Also, you have to PH for him there and put Olmedo at 3b.
RV thinks he has to slot only 3B in the two hole, LOL.
QUOTE (KyYlE23 @ Sep 7, 2012 -> 05:41 PM)
The two most likely posters in this type of thread
Let's pretend this team rises to the occasion when it really matters.
QUOTE (justBLAZE @ Sep 5, 2012 -> 05:31 PM)
I feel like at least one of the beat writers would pick up on this already.
Writers sit on this kind of news for weeks typically. Industry standard.
QUOTE (CWSpalehoseCWS @ Sep 5, 2012 -> 05:18 PM)
+1
I love A.J. but if this turns out to be true, I'm done with him. I have no respect what-so-ever for players that use PED's.
Then you have no respect what-so-ever for somewhere around half of MLB. PEDs are everywhere in baseball.
QUOTE (caulfield12 @ Sep 3, 2012 -> 03:33 AM)
Liriano's ERA with the Sox is 4.54.
Nothing great, but he's still improved on his season averages with the Twins since joining us. Better than regressing, like Greinke did for awhile.
Of course, many would now argue the Angels' chances for the post-season are about the same as the Sox.
Huh? The Sox are in 1st place.
QUOTE (NorthSideSox72 @ Aug 31, 2012 -> 01:07 PM)
Most important series of the year so far. F*** Detroit and the horse they rode in on. Go Sox.
For the Tigers.
Sox need just one win, IMO.
Two would be great.
QUOTE (greg775 @ Aug 28, 2012 -> 04:46 PM)
I have a sneaky feeling Detroit will win 2 of 3 without a sweat and likely take all 3 vs. the Royals. This could be a crucial time for Detroit. They maul KC while we face a tough team in Baltimore.
No.