Jump to content

ThunderBolt

Members
  • Posts

    11,826
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by ThunderBolt

  1. QUOTE (BigSqwert @ Nov 5, 2009 -> 04:31 PM) A-Gon can DH. So, you're saying Konerko is now our backup SS?
  2. Is it true that the Mark Gonzalez interview had something about the vets being pissed at Getz for talking about the energy of the younger guys? I don't see that as a problematic statement, but... given that we heard that Dye and Konerko got pissed at Swish and O-Cab for being vocal, there might be something to that, but still i hate conspiracy theories and Dye is as good as gone anyway.
  3. QUOTE (BigSqwert @ Nov 5, 2009 -> 04:29 PM) Why don't we just get Pujols and Utley? Given that we're already doing Torres and Hudson for A-Gon won't that create something of a log-jam?
  4. Because Figgins would cost a s*** load of money that would make other moves prohibitive?
  5. I think there's a solid chance that the Royals sell Guillen for whomever is dumb enough to take that contract, and start Fields in the OF.
  6. QUOTE (RockRaines @ Nov 5, 2009 -> 04:15 PM) I'll miss him too, he's the type of player everyone clamors for when we watch the big guys strike out with RISP with all we need is contact. He will kill us for years. From where? Getz isn't in the position to start in KC, unless they make a handful more moves.
  7. QUOTE (RockRaines @ Nov 5, 2009 -> 03:57 PM) So with Teahen and Kotasy, we pretty much have backups for every position including catcher right? Nix 2b, 3b, Lf, SS(shudder) Kotsay 1b, LF, RF, CF Teahen 1b, 2b, 3b, Rf, LF. We have some great depth.
  8. I hope we go hard after a lefty-relief arm now.
  9. I’d do this for a year. We’d be spectacular up the middle. Beckham 3b Rios Cf Q RF Konerko 1b Pods? Johnson? Dunn? Bob Dole? DH AJ C Ramirez SS Teahen LF Nix 2b
  10. I think Beckham at leadoff is a one-year stop-gap. Not a long-term option.
  11. QUOTE (kitekrazy @ Nov 5, 2009 -> 02:15 PM) Someone enlighten me. How does this improve the Sox? How does it weaken us?
  12. QUOTE (knightni @ Nov 5, 2009 -> 01:37 PM) [/b] Yes. Who steals a base? Who leads off? Beckham leads off. Beckham, Rios Nix, Ramirez, and Pods steal bases. Beckham Rios Q Konerko DH AJ Ramirez Teahen Nix Bench Retherford Kotsay Flowers Pods
  13. Hypothetically, if Nix replaces Getz and Teahen replaces Q in LF, with Q moving to RF. Do we all still have an issue here?
  14. QUOTE (Kalapse @ Nov 5, 2009 -> 01:30 PM) "Versatile defender" should only apply to players that can actually defend multiple positions relatively well. And if he is going to be penciled in at 2B like the original poster suggested then they're once again ignoring defense. I think it depends where we slot it. Teahen>Dye, Nix>Getz, ETC.
  15. QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Nov 5, 2009 -> 01:26 PM) The A's also expected a lot of guys to develop power based on how Giambi had developed surprising power for his frame. They had a bit of an issue with their data, it turned out. Steroids are a hell of a drug.
  16. QUOTE (Kalapse @ Nov 5, 2009 -> 01:22 PM) That would be the M.O. of this current regime: completely ignoring defense. I actually think this trade is the exact opposite.
  17. When he was drafted the A's were in a tizzy about how projectable Teahen was. How he looked like a guy who could grow into a massive amount of power, it never played out, but their are flashes.
  18. QUOTE (KyYlE23 @ Nov 5, 2009 -> 01:18 PM) him and buck were the centerpieces of the Beltran deal, werent they? That didnt really work out for the Royals I believe it was Teahen, Buck and Mike Wood (pitcher) for Beltran. So, yeah. That didn't work out well.
  19. QUOTE (striker62704 @ Nov 5, 2009 -> 01:16 PM) Interesting that KW picked up another underachieving 1st rounder. That was my thought too. Teahen had a heck of a lot draft hype.
  20. QUOTE (scenario @ Nov 5, 2009 -> 01:08 PM) I say we nix the Jayson/Chris debate before it getz ridiculous. You can take me in a manly fashion after this.
  21. QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Nov 5, 2009 -> 01:04 PM) OK, lets drop the Nix/Getz garbage. There is no point to it at this point. i agree with you and ChiSoxfn. It's a dead horse, let's respect that and move on to the more tangible aspects of the trade.
  22. QUOTE (KyYlE23 @ Nov 5, 2009 -> 01:01 PM) dont pull this bulls***. your feelings on Nix are the exact same. Plus, everytime someone makes a point in Getz favor you dismiss it in favor of potential. I seem to remember giving you every fielding metric in the book, and you writing it off. All i hear is how great Getz is going to be, and all those arguements aren't based on anything other then what the eyes told you. And eye can decieve.
  23. Getz sucked at 2b. Teahen player better then him across the field.
×
×
  • Create New...