-
Posts
36,280 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
153
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by Chicago White Sox
-
Sox sign former Royal LHRP Tim Hill to 1-year, $1.8M contract
Chicago White Sox replied to 2Deep's topic in Pale Hose Talk
I can’t believe the name here hasn’t leaked out yet. -
Oh I’m 100% with you. I’m not doing a Cease trade with Baltimore unless I’m getting one of Kjerstad or Cowser (or theoretically Mayo, but far more unlikely) as the centerpiece plus one of their infield prospects (preferably not Norby) as plus a solid third piece. I do think Ortiz could be that second piece, but I view him more of a high floor guy than someone with anything close to a 5 fWAR ceiling.
-
FWIW, BA put a 70 grade on Ortiz’s fielding in their latest update vs. having him at a 60 grade previously. While I’ll always be skeptical of someone making that type of defensive jump at his age, it’s really the bat that I’m concerned bout. I’ve heard about these rumored elite EVs, but they conflict with every single scouting report I read on him. And without access to Statcast type data at the minor league level, I highly question the validity of said statements.
-
I would say that anything Macsandz says should be taken with a massive grain of salt. I can’t recall one single rumor he has gotten right but many he has gotten wrong.
-
Sox sign former Royal LHRP Tim Hill to 1-year, $1.8M contract
Chicago White Sox replied to 2Deep's topic in Pale Hose Talk
Most likely yes -
Sox sign former Royal LHRP Tim Hill to 1-year, $1.8M contract
Chicago White Sox replied to 2Deep's topic in Pale Hose Talk
Not Steve Cishek is suggesting Scott Alexander -
Sox sign former Royal LHRP Tim Hill to 1-year, $1.8M contract
Chicago White Sox replied to 2Deep's topic in Pale Hose Talk
Yup, checks multiple boxes! -
Sox sign former Royal LHRP Tim Hill to 1-year, $1.8M contract
Chicago White Sox replied to 2Deep's topic in Pale Hose Talk
But the Price is Right! -
Sox sign former Royal LHRP Tim Hill to 1-year, $1.8M contract
Chicago White Sox replied to 2Deep's topic in Pale Hose Talk
I’ll say Amir Garrett -
I don’t envision this being a rebuild like we saw previously. If/when they move Cease, it will be for near major league ready prospects. I think they want to be competing for a s%*# AL Central by 2026. Unfortunately, there is not much we can do next year since the bulk of top prospects aren’t quite ready and will need some time to develop once they are finally called up.
-
Agree…not a ton of guys like that is the problem though. However, if we are going to dumpster dive, I would target guys with additional control. Kyle Lewis is controllable through 2026 and makes complete as part of a RF solution (not sure how his defense is nowadays, but has to better than Sheets). Code Heuer is controllable through 2025 and his pitch mix still makes a ton of sense in our park. I’m sure there are others like that who will come dirt cheap and can offer theoretical value beyond 2024 if they somehow pan out.
-
Nothing wrong with signing placeholders and not over-spending on C tier free agents to multi year deals. I think people here who are frustrated are just worried we’re making the move based on name value and not acknowledging the decline last year in his defensive performance (primarily framing). The Sox under Hahn weren’t very effective playing in this space and more or less just lit cash on fire to “fill” holes. Hopefully Getz does better in this tier of free agency.
-
I’m not sure Kendall Graveman had that much of a market to be overly picky on the return. And regarding the 40 man, it’s hard to imagine we’ll be pushing the limit on spots this year. I think it’s simply a minor trade that likely won’t end up providing us with any value but was worth a roll of the dice at the time.
-
Oh no doubt having two good game-callers can help everyone, but I think the marginal value starts to erode some when you’re talking about completely sacrificing any offense out of the catcher spot while they’re handling more experienced pitchers. I’m not losing sleep over this…just theorizing this move may be foreshadowing a Cease for pitching prospects trade.
-
Because where are all these young pitchers that we need two veteran SPs to handle? I think it’s very clear that this focus on defense is to help a young pitching staff, but right now it’s not like the projected Opening Day roster is overflowing with a bunch of promising young arms. That tells me that when Cease goes out, near major league ready pitching is coming back. Obviously this is all me speculating, but it’s the only way the broader set of moves make any sense.