QUOTE(Tmar28 @ Nov 27, 2005 -> 03:24 PM)
1. peterson is a pretty bad player, hence he should not be racking up rushing yards.
2. the fumble was indeed the weakest point of my argument. the point was that the team was driving and in field goal range and the bears happen to force a turnover.
3. morgan went down 5 minutes into the game. thats 55 minutes without morgan. bulls*** that that did not have an effect.
4. haha theres no way you can honestly deny that the 108 yarder was luck. there are so many blocks that must occur, without an illegal hold mind you, that it does not happen by skill.
were you using your brain when you were responding, or were you just gonna back up there bears no matter what.
luck must be happening when a team cannot move the ball, which the bears cannot do. they have not had a reciever go over 100 yards in a game, nor has orton passed for more than 150 yards in a game more than once. factor in that they have rushed for over 100 yards 5 times, and thats a pretty bad offense. the points must therefore come from defense and special teams. and as we all know, special teams points are mostly luck and you know it.
1. Peterson is not a bad player, you would know that if you had ever watched him
3. The Bears were up 7-0 3 minutes in, the Bears gave up only 3 points all game. Unless you were counting on Morgan to score for them he would have had no effect on the game.
Is a 46 yard INT TD with 3 minutes left luck?
Being best in the league in points and yards allowed is pretty lucky to.
Remember when you said the Cowboys D is better than the Bears?