MiddleCoastBias

QUOTE (Steve9347 @ Mar 12, 2012 -> 09:13 AM) Man, movies have been severely lacking for what seems like forever. I haven't even had the inclination to see a movie in the theater since GWTDT. Two hours ago I had no idea which movie you were referring to. I then just finished the book an hour later and went to send a friend a text to tell him to read it. Didn't want to spell the whole thing out so I went with the initials. Next thought was "you cheeky bastard... you had it all along".

QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Mar 7, 2012 -> 08:20 PM) Merk What's the news on Stults? Strengths/weaknesses/chances? I can honestly say I've never heard that name.

QUOTE (Steve9347 @ Mar 7, 2012 -> 04:55 PM) John Carter is apparently awful. The extended previews look so much like Star Wars: Episode II. The whole "in a coliseum of death with an alien race cheering against you" thing seemed to be directly lifted.

QUOTE (Jenksismyb**** @ Mar 5, 2012 -> 05:16 PM) I've been known to drink too much while watching the Bulls/Bears/Sox/Illini and been too lazy to walk upstairs. So i'll use the utility sink in my basement. Never a real bathroom sink though. I'm also a routine pisser in the shower. Holy... Substitute Hawks for Bears and this would have been my post verbatim.

Portillo's, Jimmy John's, and Potbelly. Never knew how much I loved those three until I can't have them anymore. And may I just say, I don't want to see Five Guys anywhere near this list. It's a trashcake chain; you only like it because people WANT you to like it. Sit down and actually eat one of those burgers and you'll realize that it isn't nearly as delicious as people claim it is, especially for the price.

MLB Network was doing a countdown of the top 100 players in baseball yesterday (it may have been a rerun but it was new to me). They did a little breakout session to discuss who they thought would have a big bounce-back year. In that discussion, Harold Reynolds predicted Adam Dunn to have 40 HRs this year.

I love Nick Swisher at #36 on that list from 2008....

QUOTE (Milkman delivers @ Mar 3, 2012 -> 05:22 PM) ? I'll go ahead and say with all certainty that they are. I mean, unless it's a bottle a roofies, I don't know what you could buy that could get you back together with someone that doesn't want to be with you.

QUOTE (SoxFan1 @ Mar 1, 2012 -> 06:14 PM) I figured Frank would kinda be a unanimous, no-brainier amongst all Sox fans. Hell, he's the reason I'm a White Sox fan. I'm with a lot of other poster, apparently. For some reason, Frank was never my favorite; I loved having him, just never fawned over him. Durham BlackJack Paulie Honorable mention: Griffey. He has always been my favorite player of all time. I don't care if he didn't do much for us (though he did his part in 163), I will die happy knowing that Ken Griffey Jr. graced our outfield for a minute.

QUOTE (caulfield12 @ Feb 26, 2012 -> 11:23 PM) First semi-surprise, Clooney loses to the French dude from THE ARTIST. Wonder if we'll still remember: the Actor in a Leading Role, Jean Dujardin Director, Michel Hazanavicius five years from now? Not to assume that you were saying they were undeserving but I'm going to play devil's advocate here... Relate this back to baseball and the Gold Glove awards. Think of how many years there have been amazingly deserving candidates for a GG but they get beaten out because of the name-game candidates like Jeter and Hunter. Now bring it back to these lesser-to-unknown candidate winners of the Oscars: while we as casual observers may say the "Jeter" of the acting field should have won, the true advocates probably feel very happy that these lesser-known people got their due recognition. The question of "wonder if we'll still remember ... in five years" is again pertinent in the GG discussion; while we (as baseball fans) know who DID win, we still talk about how SHOULD have won, and that's equally true in the entertainment world.

QUOTE (SoxFan1 @ Feb 26, 2012 -> 03:56 AM) <!--quoteo(post=2552825:date=Feb 25, 2012 -> 06:03 PM:name=Balta1701)-->QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Feb 25, 2012 -> 06:03 PM) <!--quotec-->Your browser does not support iframes. There's something very unique about how Dunn goes about things. I kinda get the sense there are two ways to look at this: 1) He's extremely confident in what he's done throughout the course of his career, what he knows is tried and true, and something was very wrong behind the scenes in 2011 that attributed to a lot of his failures. OR 2) He's just extremely lazy, doesn't really care, and is just going to go out there and do his own thing, no matter what. I think Dunn either has another crap season in 2012 or he comes out and has a monster, prime-Adam Dunn season. I just can't see anything in the middle happening. We know he has insane power. We know the guy can draw walks like none other. And we know he's also going to strike out a ton. Hopefully he can just get his mind right and go out there and do what we brought him in to do. Maybe less pressure (due to lower team expectations) will help. Remember the good old days? Your browser does not support iframes. "All Adam has to do is touch 'em, he is that strong." - Stone. ....sigh Here's hoping it's a turnaround season for the big guy.

QUOTE (kjshoe04 @ Feb 26, 2012 -> 01:28 AM) Nobody watches the NHL. It's by far the 4th or 5th most popular depending on how you view nascar/ I feel it's necessary for someone to note that his avatar says he's from Sweden.

Folks, that isn't on JR or the Sox- that reflects the changes to the City budget. The City of Chicago has implemented a congestion fee of an additional fee of $2 on weekdays this year. And if you want to say that the parking is a private fund, the recreation tax has also increased this year so I feel it's a fair business practice for the stadium to mirror the increased cost of the city parking to offset the increased tax they are charged.

QUOTE (LittleHurt05 @ Feb 25, 2012 -> 12:40 PM) I went to Culvers yesterday and received outstanding service, and I don't believe they get tips. I rented a car with Hertz & there were some issues, but the non-commission employee was great the whole time. I'd say over 90% of employees don't receive any kind of tip whatsoever, yet customer service is still great in most places. If a server was getting much a better wage, I don't think they would purposefully give s***ty service for risk of losing their job, as in any other industry. I'm not saying servers would intentionally just not care or give you poor service. I understand most every other industry DOESN'T rely on tips and they do just fine. But how many times have you hung up on customer service with your bank or someone and been pissed off that you weren't treated properly? Or stormed out of a store that wouldn't take your returned items with a receipt? While there are many examples of great helpers in a clothing store, you can also remember those times they weren't helpful at all. Tipping gives you a way to express your gratitude or disgust with the service, allowing the consumer some level of discretion as to how much they pay; s***ty service at the hardware store still means you're paying the same price.

QUOTE (LittleHurt05 @ Feb 25, 2012 -> 12:11 PM) When you tip, you are paying 20% over the cost of the burger anyway, so what's the difference if they raise the price. Mandatory tipping is stupid IMO. Pay the restaurant workers a better wage and let me decide if they deserve an extra tip. I am already paying 20% over the menu price now anyway, so if they raise the prices it will work out the same. It was nice in Australia & New Zealand, tipping is not expected all because the servers make a much higher wage. If someone's service was was that much better, then you can give them a little extra at your discretion, but not be required too. Right, but the tip is a discretionary increase. If they gave you great service with your burger, you tip them the extra money. Meanwhile if you have s***ty service but the price is already included, you end up paying the same without receiving the same quality of service. Having a tipping system allows the the consumer to justify spending $13 on a burger plus good service versus $13 for a burger and potentially poor service.

QUOTE (witesoxfan @ Feb 24, 2012 -> 05:14 PM) That is f***ing GREAT hustle. (*slaps ass HARD*) That needs to be an emoticon.

QUOTE (Tex @ Feb 25, 2012 -> 09:56 AM) I recently gave a server at a popular chain restaurant a smaller than 10% tip because she was inattentive to my table while bestowing great attention to a larger table. When I finally have to get up and find someone to get my check, that sucks. THe reply was my server was very busy with that other group. To which I said, so she was working and taking care of customers, just not me. It was the first time I can remember tipping below 15% in a long long time. I usually bounce between 15 and 20% unless the tab was small for some reason then I will tip a higher percentage. There is one place in particular where the owners will usually comp my meals, I will always calculate the tip on what the bill should have been, not what it actually was. This guy sounds like a pompous dick. If I was in the group I would have to go back and later and tip the server myself. And, while we are on the subject, I hate the tradition of tipping. Pay the servers a decent wage and leave me out of it. The restaurants are not going to eat that added cost of paying their servers more, they'll just raise the price of that $9 burger to $13. I think the tip is most fair: with no tip and the raised price of food, there is no disincentive for s***ty service. In that regard I think we should be so lucky to decide what tip we give.

QUOTE (Buehrle>Wood @ Feb 21, 2012 -> 10:28 PM) Been watching a lot of movies lately: Shawshank Redemption (rewatch)- Still one of the greatest movies of all-time. Fight Club (rewatch)- I think I finally got bored of this movie. The Social Network (rewatch)- The more I see this, the more I realize how amazing this movie is. The Wrestler (rewatched) -Still one of my favorites Ides of March- One of the best movies of 2011. Not that says much at all. Safe House- Pretty much by the books, and a bit of a sloppy plot. Could have been a lot better. Drive- Meh, expected a lot better of this movie. Still probably better than anything I've seen nominated for Best Picture (other than Moneyball). Mystic River- Loved this movie. Definitely deserves its acclaim. I agree with Fight Club, I probably wore that one out as well. Watched it again a couple months ago and realized I need to put that back on the shelf for a long while. I've heard Ides was pretty flat. Granted, I've worked on political campaigns for a couple years so when I hear from my campaign friends that it wasn't at all realistic I know I can't expect too much out of it. In that same vein, I'm sure NASA scientists spit all over Apollo 13 but it doesn't make it a bad movie. Ides is still at the top of my queue, I'll just make a judgment for myself. Mystic River has been sitting on the top of my DVD player for the longest time, just haven't been in the mood for it as it gets passed over for countless movies. Now that you bring it up, I'm going to make a conscious effort to find the time to finally get around to it.

Sarcasm

All of this discussion got me wondering what knots people use. For a spread collar I stick to the full windsor or the Persian, four-in-hand for casual days, and the Simple Double for narrow ties. Related, just wore a bow tie to work the other day for the hell of it. Took me a few minutes to remember how to tie it but I got a few entertaining discussions in an otherwise boring office environment. What knots do you guys use most?

I finally got around to watching "Gone Baby Gone" (2007) yesterday. Absolutely loved it. Casey Affleck was great and Ed Harris did his thing. Very interesting how the story was kind of split up into three different segments, though I feel the ending was a bit drawn out. I've seen The Town probably 5 times so it was interesting to see how Ben Affleck built off of his directorial debut of Gone Baby Gone (and I'm pretty sure they're both books).

QUOTE (kapkomet @ Feb 12, 2012 -> 08:39 PM) What, no votes for the Minneapolis airport bathrooms? Nope, but we should count the entirety of the Metrodome.

QUOTE (Quinarvy @ Feb 12, 2012 -> 10:33 AM) Significantly. And it helps the Sox for both. Obviously the bidding isn't over yet but the offer for Cespedes sounds encouraging. I was hoping he would end up somewhere in the 40s (even $49.5M) just to show that the price came down from the original $50+M. If the rumor of the much lower Marlins offer is true, I would imagine that increases the chances that the Sox can play ball in a Soler bidding war.

QUOTE (Milkman delivers @ Feb 12, 2012 -> 09:46 AM) It's truly projectile-vomit and explosive-diarrhea inducing that he's no longer a Cardinal. Sounds like we're about to have a new entry... http://www.soxtalk.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=84409

If this is true, how much do you think affects what Soler will get?