Eminor3rd

QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Apr 13, 2014 -> 11:19 AM) Like, oh I don't know... Scott Feldman. Precisely.

QUOTE (elrockinMT @ Apr 13, 2014 -> 08:07 PM) You ruined a good post with this inane idea of trading Beckham. Semien hasn't proven anything yet You say that like Beckham has.

Alright, Marty. I'll bite again. QUOTE (Marty34 @ Apr 13, 2014 -> 08:40 AM) I'm still waiting for your answer about how, if performance matters more than track record as you claimed in an earlier thread, why Jake Peavy returned more in a trade than Scott Feldman last year. 1. This is completely unrelated to the topic 2. What does "performance vs. track record" even mean? Is performance not the primary component of track record? They are not mutually exclusive. It makes no sense. 3. What I DID say in an earlier thread is that GMs should (and increasing DO) pay for players (in both money and assets) based on the performance they expect going forward as opposed to the performance that has occurred in the past. Track record is one thing that can inform a projected performance going forward, but it would be foolish to use it exclusively. Why could Carlos Beltran only sign a 2yr/$26m contract this offseason? His track record suggests he's a borderline hall of famer! Should someone have paid him $100m? Because that's what Ellsbury got and Ellsbury doesn't have as good a track record. 4. Regarding Peavy/Feldman: There are more factors that go into trade value than simply the quality of one player versus the other. Here are some examples: number of suitors, contract length, contract dollars, budget of teams involved, value of marginal wins to team involved, personality of front office, ownership expectations, near and long-term revenue opportunities, perceived window of competition, etc. You're comparing two different players with different contracts who were traded from two different teams to two other different teams at different parts of the season and expecting that their trade values should be compared apples to apples. That's like saying "if this burger isn't better than steak, how come it cost the same today as a steak cost in 1911?" QUOTE (Marty34 @ Apr 13, 2014 -> 08:40 AM) As far as Fangraphs goes it has been elevated by the people who read it to something more than opinion. It's got a LONG way to go before it reaches the stuature of the NY Times. What in this god-forsaken world does FanGraphs have to do with the NY Times? If I want to learn about the latest in global politics, I'll read the NY Times. If I want to know if Dayan Viciedo has stopped swinging at s***ty pitches, I'll read FanGraphs. I have no idea what you're trying to argue here. QUOTE (Marty34 @ Apr 13, 2014 -> 08:40 AM) Why should I be happy that even though Paulino is awful, he is cheap? You shouldn't, now that we actually know he's bad. But there was reason to believe we could fix him at little cost when we acquired him, and that's a good thing.

QUOTE (Marty34 @ Apr 12, 2014 -> 09:46 PM) Sorry, but Fangraphs is awful. You don't think things are going well right now? Fangraphs is at the forefront of mainstream baseball analysis right now. Even conservative outlets are buying in -- Fox Sports JUST signed a contract with FG to have them start writing articles for them, for example. Also, FanGraphs has NOTHING to do with us being hopeful about Felipe Paulino. That would be like me saying, "Man I hate paying Chicago street sweeping tickets. THANKS OBAMA." I would be inclined to take your anti-SABR criticisms seriously (because there are a lot of valid criticisms to make) if you ever even put an ounce of effort into actually understanding what you're talking about. You don't even know what you hate about it, you just hate it for the sake of hating it. It's like when a child wants to play in traffic and won't listen to his parents when they try to explain why he can't. I guess the question would be this: why is FanGraphs awful? I don't expect you to answer that because you never do. Because you don't actually read it and have nothing to say about it. You just know Hawk probably wouldn't like it. I think there are a lot of promising things going on with the White Sox. I just notice you never want to talk about them. You seem to just like raining on everyone's parade. Like, why was it so hard to accept that witesoxfan was happy that Paulino had a shot to be good on the cheap? It looks like the gamble isn't paying off. No one will argue that. But why couldn't we be happy about taking a low-risk shot in the dark?

You guys are insane today

Apparently none of you actually read the article. Sullivan has been writing nothing but positive Abreu articles for the past few weeks. He's been most of the national coverage, lol. He was just pointing out that it was interesting that the homer was such a cheapie. Let's not act like fanboys, guys. We don't have to get mad at every word about Abreu that doesn't call him a god.

QUOTE (Marty34 @ Apr 12, 2014 -> 09:36 PM) Had to be a bootleg statistic offered up by Fangraphs. Paulino is and was a waste of time. No, it was pure hope from raw tools and upside. The scoutiest, non-Fangraphs thing there is. I'm glad you could feel good about s***ting all over it anyway. Here's a question: what are you going to post if things ever start going well?

QUOTE (Chet Kincaid @ Apr 12, 2014 -> 03:38 PM) Oh I see. What about Paulino? How did he look? Horrible

God this f***ing bullpen

QUOTE (Dick Allen @ Apr 11, 2014 -> 07:10 AM) I would Stubhub the tickets. You will get great seats at a great price. I doubt there will be a problem getting a blanket, but if you ae there a bit before gametime, if they are out at a gate you are at and you really want one, go to a different gate. They should probably have some unless it is just about gametime. I doubt there will be 20k at the game.

QUOTE (flavum @ Apr 11, 2014 -> 06:47 AM) By the way, when does the national media start giving Abreu the Puig Treatment? Ever? Or do you have be on a coast or the Cubs? When he becomes controversial...

QUOTE (Marty34 @ Apr 10, 2014 -> 03:47 PM) The need for an impact bat just got greater. If it came down to Rodon, a HS pitcher, or Jackson, I could see the Sox taking Jackson now. BPA, BPA, all day, every day.

The blackouts don't anger me nearly as much as the fact that archived games randomly restart mid stream, that they leave up the blank COMMERCIAL BREAK screen for some unknown reason even when watching archived streams, that the screen goes blank when you fast forward so that you have no idea where you are, that the slowest you can FF is in :59 increments, making it impossible to skip the blank, unsold commercial breaks, that there's no way to skip to specific innings, that the Apple TV stream shows the final scores of the archived games by default, etc. Mlb.tv is a textbook example of how quality suffers without competition.

QUOTE (IowaSoxFan @ Apr 9, 2014 -> 11:23 AM) mlb.tv is the biggest joke there is. I live more than 250 miles from the nearest mlb stadium yet I am considered in market, and therefore blacked out from, all White Sox, Cubs, Twins, Cardinals, Brewers and Royals games, that 20% of the league. I second this. I hate that it's the only way to watch games now that I'm not in Chicago. The product just sucks. Glitchy streams, no features, weird blackouts, etc.

QUOTE (Dick Allen @ Apr 9, 2014 -> 01:06 PM) I kind of agree. He hits many balls hard, but his groundball rate is one Leury Garcia would be proud of. If he is thinking about homers, maybe he gets the ball in the air a bit more, and if he does, more runs will happen. I think part of his GB issues are that he's always reaching out of the zone to hit stuff. When he hits liners, they travel, he just needs better pitches to get more liners.

QUOTE (LittleHurt05 @ Apr 9, 2014 -> 09:04 AM) Can that decrease still if he sucks it up for the rest of the year and plays crappy defense? Yep.

QUOTE (Marty34 @ Apr 9, 2014 -> 08:14 AM) If Flowers is fixed (check back in a month), Severson should immediately get Coop-like status Agreed. Unfortunately it doesn't look like it'll last from his peripherals. Leads the majors with a .714 BABIP and is sitting pretty on a 32% K rate and 25% HR/FB.

QUOTE (The Ginger Kid @ Apr 9, 2014 -> 08:28 AM) Frank's ego was always his biggest flaw I'm guessing he took some sage advice in keeping his mouth shut during the HOF voting.

Tyler Flowers already has 0.5 fWAR. His total for last season was -0.1.

Coolest part of last night's game, IMO, was Abreu really working the counts. Pitchers are clearly pitching him very carefully and seeing what they can get away with, and he's got a TON of plate coverage so it's worked out okay so far, but it's still nice to see him force them to get closer to the zone. Really impressed with how quickly he's adjusted so far to his first taste of the best pitching in the world (Not MIN and COL, of course, but ML in general).

QUOTE (CaliSoxFanViaSWside @ Apr 8, 2014 -> 11:35 AM) Great to see Sale using the chageup more than the slider so far this year. Absolutely. Can only bode well for his health.

Minor league? Sure Charlotte has the AAA equivalent of 90's Barves pitching at this point, right?

That's the worst FG Community article I've read

QUOTE (Jose Abreu @ Apr 4, 2014 -> 12:07 PM) One can assume that the comment was made because of Denver's location. It's windy and a mile high over there. The Rockies play in Denver. If those factors are always existent there, then the Rockies should theoretically lead the majors in HRs every year. This would be true if all ML hitters had the same ability to hit for power.

QUOTE (TheTruth05 @ Apr 4, 2014 -> 09:56 AM) What about trading for a guy like Brandon Belt? Only 25,plays LF, left handed power/average bat that would benefit from a park like the Cell. Albeit he's probably gonna be expensive but either way the Sox are gonna have to pay up if they want to get a serious LH bat to hit in that 5 hole. I just don't know why he would be available at any point in the foreseeable future.