Baron

I mean say you dont add anyone and the lineup has Garcia in it. If Lawrie isnt hitting the bottom of that lineup is one huge black hole. Atleast there's some hope for the catcher platoon. Even if Lawrie is hitting that lineup still doesnt look good at the bottom.

QUOTE (Rowand44 @ Jan 17, 2016 -> 10:37 PM) You guys sure like to freak out about Twitter rumors. I'm not freaking out. But it would piss me off to see Cespedes back on the Tigers and for the foreseeable future. All while we have some fool in the OF who cant hit and is part of the collective(the entire OF last year) that surrendered 3-4 games worth of runs

QUOTE (fathom @ Jan 17, 2016 -> 10:02 PM) If the Tigers want him they will easily outbid the Sox Quite easily if they choose.

QUOTE (fathom @ Jan 17, 2016 -> 09:59 PM) Oh yay, this would easily be worst case https://mobile.twitter.com/JonHeyman/status...930590360518656 Hahn is too busy kicking rocks right now to worry about our division rival getting a really good OFer.

QUOTE (caulfield12 @ Jan 17, 2016 -> 05:08 PM) For who, though? They don't need Anderson...you're willing to part with Adams and everything remaining on the shelf but Fulmer? For a rental? Probably not. I doubt either of them would be in the conversation anyway.

QUOTE (soxfan2014 @ Jan 17, 2016 -> 04:43 PM) Wonder what would happen then. Trade Gomez and play Rasmus in CF? I'd take Gomez. I wanted him at the deadline last year.

Peter Gammons ‏@pgammo 2m2 minutes ago Thrice today I had execs say "watch the Astros on Cespedes." 5th best HR park in MLB in '15. Good lineup. OK, I'm watching https://twitter.com/pgammo I'm not sure if I buy this one....definitely not the Larry King tweet

QUOTE (Big Hurtin @ Jan 15, 2016 -> 12:01 PM) He'll be starting in RF for the White Sox on opening day. If that happens they are going to pay for it at the trade deadline. When they are forced to upgrade if they are anywhere near the playoffs.

Jon Heyman ‏@JonHeyman 9s10 seconds ago to clarify, mets do NOT have a 1-year offer currently on table. theyd talk about 1-3-yr pacts if cespedes came off long deal https://twitter.com/JonHeyman Ok so in that case we would definitely be out of the running. He's still thinking long term.

That doesnt sound like he's saying the White Sox are back in. That just sounds like he's just putting the pieces together with the info from a few weeks ago. Maybe Cespedes would only accept a low year offer from the Mets.

QUOTE (Y2JImmy0 @ Jan 15, 2016 -> 12:31 PM) What did he tweet? Sources: Cespedes believed to be weighing 5/$90m w/possible option offer from O's vs. one-year deal with Mets and become a free agent again. https://twitter.com/JesseSanchezMLB/status/...062113365889024 So I dont know what the hell Rick Hahn is doing. But passing up on either deal is rather silly.

Well after Jesse Sanchez's tweet I think we can consider this whole thing dead.

QUOTE (Chicago White Sox @ Jan 14, 2016 -> 06:27 PM) I will say this, if the Orioles land Cespedes for a contract in that range, then I'm going to f***ing enraged. I'll be pissed. But not as pissed as I probably would have been a few weeks ago.

QUOTE (Dick Allen @ Jan 14, 2016 -> 06:17 PM) Out of curiosity how many runs did the Sox OF defense cost them in 2015? About 30 runs. That's what I was getting at with Jackson. With him on a down year in this category for him your still saving yourself probably 11 or so. Just off the top of my head I think that's atleast worthy of 4 games worth of losses.

QUOTE (Dick Allen @ Jan 14, 2016 -> 06:02 PM) I know you are admittedly obsessed by the runs saved stat, but doesn't that vary from year to year? I'm averaging.

QUOTE (Dick Allen @ Jan 14, 2016 -> 05:37 PM) I think with Sale, Q, and Rodon, elite OF are not all that necessary. Just make the regular plays, throw to the right base....the 2005 White Sox had Pods and Dye in the corners. They really weren't good defenders, but they made the plays they had to make. Pods couldn't throw, and that is really all JD could do. And that OF was considered good defensively. RH's obsession with ground ball pitchers and the small OF at USCF make having an elite OF defensively a luxury Nobody's asking for Elite Defense. If we wanted Elite Defense we would have signed Jason Heyward. Adding Fowler into that mix would probably equate them to being capable of combining for 4 losses worth of runs.

QUOTE (BlackSox13 @ Jan 14, 2016 -> 05:19 PM) And yet you have admitted that Fowler is barely an upgrade over Eaton so I really don't see the sacrifice you're talking about. Help me understand where you're coming from because I don't see it. Do you not think Eaton would be an upgrade over Melky in LF or Avi in RF? Adding Fowler to Eaton in the outfield would make the outfield more athletic by removing one of Melky/Avi who run more like lumberjacks. Don't get me wrong, I agree the Sox need better defense from the outfielders. I have absolutely no idea if Eaton is going to be any better switching spots. Replacing him with Fowler in CF is essentially a wash or worse(certainly capable of getting worse on defense as he's shown).Fowler had right around the same misplay(out of position) runs as Garcia.

QUOTE (caulfield12 @ Jan 14, 2016 -> 05:00 PM) Jackson is better than both those guys...especially CF comparing him with Cespedes. I think in the corner spots he's just a tad worse if I remember correctly. But definitely better in CF.

QUOTE (BlackSox13 @ Jan 14, 2016 -> 04:56 PM) It's true Fowler is barely a defensive upgrade over Eaton but by moving Eaton to a corner OF spot, Eaton upgrades that corner spot. I'll take Eaton in LF or RF any day over Melky or Avi. As for projections. Without knowing for sure what ball park Fowler will be playing defense in, that projection is rather meaningless. Imo, a more accurate way of looking at it is to judge Fowler's defense based upon last year. The Cell has deeper gaps but shorter lines than Wrigley so the difference should be somewhat minimal and roughly the same amount of ground to cover. The only time I've used that projection was just a little bit ago. Everything else is from past years. He's a very bad defender. Especially in Center Field. Just how much are you willing to sacrifice is the question. I'm on record of not wanting to sacrifice defense anymore in the outfield. I dont want to see tons of out of position runs given up again. Just poor fundamentals from bad defenders.

QUOTE (Lillian @ Jan 14, 2016 -> 04:48 PM) Austin Jackson is not a significant offensive upgrade over Avi. In fact, given Avi's age and inexperience, it would be reasonable to hope that he might out produce Jackson. Jackson would bring better defense, but that is not worth the money, which he would cost. If the Sox are going to settle for nothing more than a defensive upgrade in the outfield, I'd rather they tried to accomplish it with a young player with potential, who would not cost much. There are plenty of guys around who haven't yet been able to demonstrate that they can be productive Major League hitters, but are good defensive players. Guys like Jordan Danks, and Trayce Thompson, who are both now gone, would make more sense than signing Jackson. In any case, if a new outfield acquisition is made, he better be able to play RF. I don't want to see Eaton or Melky out there, in that corner. Cespedes is a different story, as his bat and defensive upgrade in LF would be enough to compensate for weaker defense in RF. You guys have persuaded me that he would not be willing, or even able, according to some, to play RF. Once again technically Jackson's defense is better than anyone we've been talking about except for Upton and Cespedes. He breaks even in alot of defensive categories which I cant say is the case for alot of these guys. The question is what value do you put on the prospect of potentially saving anywhere from around 11-15 runs? How many games do you think that could potentially cost if you dont save them?

QUOTE (SoxPride18 @ Jan 14, 2016 -> 04:37 PM) That's just a projection though? I'm sure he had a negative projection last year given from past history. Players can outplay projections. Technically in runs saved he was about right where he needed to be last year which was -12. The year before he was -20 which was a huge drop. Still Garcia actually gave up 1 less run and was positive in the assisted runs saved category. The amount of out of position runs they both gave up though is huge.

QUOTE (SoxPride18 @ Jan 14, 2016 -> 04:31 PM) http://www.fangraphs.com/leaders.aspx?pos=...=&players=0 I don't see -8 anywhere. Look at the steamer projections for 2016 on his main bio page

QUOTE (BlackSox13 @ Jan 14, 2016 -> 04:00 PM) No but let's not pretend Eaton was any better in CF either. As crazy as it sounds, Fowler is a defensive upgrade over Melky/Avi/Eaton. Yep, that's how bad the Sox OF was last year. He's barely a defensive upgrade. He still gave up 20 runs in 2014 and 11 runs in 2015. Technically Garcia was better in that department than Fowler was. There was atleast a positive in the assists column. Cant say that for Fowler. Plus to the person who quoted Fangraphs. They have him at a -8 for next year.

These Fowler in CF thoughts...do people keep glossing over how bad his defense was there?

QUOTE (OmarComing25 @ Jan 13, 2016 -> 07:16 PM) Our rotation is already suspect, who are you replacing Q with? I'd probably fill it out with one of the free agents left. But it would be nice to add a 5 War OFer making minimal money to the team. Alas it's a complete longshot.