pettie4sox

Towson/NC Wilmington O 155 -110

Xavier/Seton Hall O 158 -116

QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Jan 20, 2018 -> 10:58 AM) The last defense I heard was "He didn't say S***hole he said S***House!". I figured I'd get called out if I used the former. D'Oh. to-mato toma-to =)

QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Jan 20, 2018 -> 10:43 AM) He's working hard for exactly what got him elected - a promise of fewer S***house s***hole minorities. ftfy

Man City/ Newcastle O 3.5 -112

Fener -1 -126 Penguins/Sharks O 5.5 -105

QUOTE (KagakuOtoko @ Jan 19, 2018 -> 05:48 PM) I tailed my buddy for these picks but we'll have to add the double L's to the record. He did get one W with the Turkish League pick so 1-2 isn't the worst but it isn't great either. 66-52-2 +$2551.48 Illinois @ Wisconsin Wisconsin -5 -106 Manhattan @ Canisius O 137 -116 1-1 QUOTE (KagakuOtoko @ Jan 19, 2018 -> 07:07 PM) Zverev/Chung O 38.5 -130 W QUOTE (KagakuOtoko @ Jan 19, 2018 -> 10:21 PM) Barty -4 -110 L Kerber SU W -115 Jok and Fed straight set parlay. W QUOTE (KagakuOtoko @ Jan 19, 2018 -> 10:24 PM) sydney fc + newcastle jets ml parlay L QUOTE (KagakuOtoko @ Jan 19, 2018 -> 10:26 PM) Seoul Knights -7.5 -115 W Overall 5-3 overnight YTD 71-55-2 $2825.48

Seoul Knights -7.5 -115

sydney fc + newcastle jets ml parlay

Barty -4 -110 Kerber SU -115 Jok and Fed straight set parlay.

Zverev/Chung O 38.5 -130

QUOTE (KagakuOtoko @ Jan 19, 2018 -> 12:54 PM) Berlin v Dortmund O 2.5 -112 Charleroi v Muouscron O 2.5 -105 I tailed my buddy for these picks but we'll have to add the double L's to the record. He did get one W with the Turkish League pick so 1-2 isn't the worst but it isn't great either. 66-52-2 +$2551.48 Illinois @ Wisconsin Wisconsin -5 -106 Manhattan @ Canisius O 137 -116

Berlin v Dortmund O 2.5 -112 Charleroi v Muouscron O 2.5 -105

QUOTE (Leonard Zelig @ Jan 19, 2018 -> 11:04 AM) I am unfamiliar with online betting, so I don't understand why the vig varies so much on bets where they have set the line. Caps vs Devils O 5.5 -105 K Kanepi vrs C Suarez Navarro O 21 -123 The book set the line on both of these, but on one you're paying 5% and the other its 23%. Yes but you only pay if you lose so the example here is the -105 for the over had reduced juice but the under was where the money was at, -115. The lines start at -110 so you can see how they were skewed. -123 started at -115, so the U 21 would be at -107 because the money was going for the O pretty heavily.

QUOTE (KagakuOtoko @ Jan 18, 2018 -> 05:19 PM) Terrible misread. Zidane sat his starters and played scrubs. This is what I mean't by bad bets. =) 58-49-2 +$2043.48 Delware v Hofstra O 147 W Drexel v Townson O 144 W -110 for both Tennis to come in a bit. QUOTE (KagakuOtoko @ Jan 18, 2018 -> 05:42 PM) adding Caps vs Devils O 5.5 W -105 QUOTE (KagakuOtoko @ Jan 18, 2018 -> 08:33 PM) I am so late with tennis but I don't think anyone is actually tailing, but if you are, let me know and I'll post sooner. Busta/Muller O 39 W -121 QUOTE (KagakuOtoko @ Jan 18, 2018 -> 10:13 PM) Overnight bets Perth -10.5 L -115 D SCHWARTZMAN VRS A DOLGOPOLOV O 38 W -110 K Kanepi vrs C Suarez Navarro O 21 W -123 J Ostapenko vrs A Kontaveit O 22 W -108 Hot dog what a night! 7-1! YTD 65-50-2 +$2628.48

QUOTE (Leonard Zelig @ Jan 19, 2018 -> 10:24 AM) When you have to risk more than you are going to win, that would be a favorite. Bookies always have juice on their bets. You can tell which of my bets have juice because they deviate from the normal lines. Most books have lines that start at -110 for both or -115. If you have a bookie that has reduced juice, you may get some lines that start at -105 or lower. Very rarely are you going to get even lines on a spread. The objective of the bookie is to make money. They will anticipate 50% of the bets for the favorite and 50% for the underdog. For example, say we both bet on some NFL Championship game action on Sunday. Jags are +7.5, and the Patriots are -7.5. Both lines will be at -110. You bet $110 to win $100 on the Jags at +7.5 and I bet -7.5 for the Pats $110 to win $100. One of us will win obviously so there is $220 in total bets. You win the bet and win you $100 for the bet and your $110 wager gets returned for a total of $210. I lose my $110 and that is used to pay you, but where does that extra $10 go? To the bookie of course. The bookie cannot make money on even lines that is $100 to win $100 because there is no juice. They are just praying you lose your bet so they can gobble up your cash.

QUOTE (GoSox05 @ Jan 19, 2018 -> 08:58 AM) They need to go. ICE is trash under someone like Obama. Under someone like Trump they are a nightmare. Imagine them under someone like Tom Cotton. I am having nightmares. Thank you, jerk.

Was Rabbit baiting caulfield tho?

QUOTE (Leonard Zelig @ Jan 18, 2018 -> 10:26 PM) Do you only take favorites? I don't read every post, but every money line I've seen has been - . No? How is betting overs or spreads even remotely close to favorites?

O3-108 (ALANYASPOR VRS KASIMPASA)

Overnight bets Perth -10.5 -115 D SCHWARTZMAN VRS A DOLGOPOLOV O 38 -110 K Kanepi vrs C Suarez Navarro O 21 -123 J Ostapenko vrs A Kontaveit O 22 -108

I am so late with tennis but I don't think anyone is actually tailing, but if you are, let me know and I'll post sooner. Busta/Muller O 39 -121

adding Caps vs Devils O 5.5 -105

QUOTE (KagakuOtoko @ Jan 18, 2018 -> 12:33 PM) Leganes v Real Madrid O 2.5 -124 Terrible misread. Zidane sat his starters and played scrubs. This is what I mean't by bad bets. =) 58-49-2 +$2043.48 Delware v Hofstra O 147 Drexel v Townson O 144 -110 for both Tennis to come in a bit.

Leganes v Real Madrid O 2.5 -124