ChiSox59

A lot of overreactions in this thread. The dude had just over 400 PAs with the White Sox and hasn't been a part of the organization since 2009. He has experience with another FO (and a well respected one), and was always well respected as a player. I wouldn't have minded someone with a bit more experience, but I don't really consider this a "White Sox" move.

QUOTE (ChiliIrishHammock24 @ Oct 16, 2016 -> 11:25 PM) I think MLBTR was just naming pieces that they felt would be expendable for Boston, not naming the entire package, or one they feel is fair. This isn't a shot at you (I am sure you agree), but you don't trade Chris Sale for "expendable" pieces. If Chris gets traded, the team that trades for him is going to think they got hosed. That is the type of deal the Sox need, or no Chris Sale for you.

QUOTE (RegionSox @ Oct 14, 2016 -> 10:03 AM) So why would the director of player development move to third base coach? Seems very puzzling. He has managed in the minors.

Title is wrong. Capra is new 3B coach. Hasler is new bullpen coach.

QUOTE (Eminor3rd @ Oct 13, 2016 -> 01:08 PM) Guys. I'm just afraid these threads are setting us all up for disappointment. Probably, but oh well. It makes too much sense. One of the best pitchers in baseball paid 1/3 of what he'd get on open market for THREE years. Sellers market. FA pool sucks. Teams with most to offer all get knocked out the playoffs early. The Sox have the power here to start a hell of a bidding war.

QUOTE (Eminor3rd @ Oct 13, 2016 -> 11:34 AM) Not for that offer above you wouldn't. Moncada AND Benintendi AND Kopech AND more? I definitely want Devers too if we're giving up Nate. Nate is an extremely valuable trade chip in his own right. Just look at what the Phillies got for Ken Giles. Giles is a little cheaper, but Nate is locked up for the next five years on a great deal. He's no throw in. Moncada, Benintendi, Kopech, Devers and Rodridguez for Sale and Jones, sure. But I'd want those last two. Not saying I wouldn't come off that request if it was the difference between getting the deal done and not. IMO, I want those five for Sale alone and that'd be my starting point. When they balk, I include Melky. If that doesn't excite them, only then do I offer Nate.

QUOTE (striker @ Oct 13, 2016 -> 10:12 AM) If I'm Boston, I'm asking for Nate Jones instead of Melky And I am telling them to go pound sand.

QUOTE (ChiliIrishHammock24 @ Oct 12, 2016 -> 11:26 PM) Just curious, does anyone else besides me feel like the Sox could compete next season just by unloading Quintana and Robertson for some young major league talent? Let's say...Quintana to Red Sox for Benintendi, Shaw, Groome, Kopech. And also....Roberston to Giants for Joe Panik Sox go out and sign Rich Hill and Lucroy Rotation is.... Sale Hill Rodon Gonzalez Shields/Fulmer Lineup is.... SS Anderson RF Eaton DH Abreu C Lucroy 3B Frazier LF Melky CF Benintendi 1B Shaw 2B Panik Saladino and Lawrie are your backup IF. Or maybe you even give the Giants one of those two along with Robertson until Christian Arroyo is ready to come up for them. Narvaez is your backup catcher. Nate Jones becomes your closer, and you obviously sign a couple MR in there to replace deadweights like Albers. I think that team is certainly better in 2017, even though you lost Quintana and Robertson. Lucroy is not a FA. His option is about as no brainer as they get.

QUOTE (Quinarvy @ Oct 12, 2016 -> 11:03 PM) If you could get Moncada, Benintendi, Kopech and Swihart for Sale and Melky, do you do it? I'd push for Devers too, but yah, I wouldn't be outraged if this happened.

Bit of a long shot here, but looking to fill final 2 spots in a $100 fantasy NBA league on yahoo. All payments via paypal. Can provide references to managers who have played in my leagues before/currently. Always make payouts day after season ends. Experienced commish who has run a bunch of leagues for a bunch of different sports. Basic settings are 10 teams, H2H scoring. Draft Sunday Oct 23 and 8PM CT. PM for more details. Thanks! I apologize in advance if this is the wrong place to post this or if it is not allowed. Yahoo has temporarily shut down their fantasy sports message boards which makes filling leagues nearly impossible and I'd like to fill this league out and be done with it.

There's a name that hasn't crossed my mind in months.

QUOTE (SCCWS @ Oct 11, 2016 -> 03:04 PM) FWIW: Boston/Providence paper and talk media are pretty consistent today. Red Sox priorities in order: 1. DH-Bullpen( esp.lefty) and 3B. Most figure bullpen via trade and DH and 3B in house 2. Alex Speier who is one of their prime reporters said they have 6 starters signed for next year. "This may be an offseason defined more by subtle changes rather than fundamental ones. In the rotation, the team retains control over its six primary starters this year – David Price, Rick Porcello, Eduardo Rodriguez, Drew Pomeranz, Steven Wright, and Clay Buchholz (whose $13.5 million option represents almost a no-brainer given its short term and the righthander’s solid performance down the stretch). Will the Red Sox explore the trade market to see if the White Sox are inclined to deal Chris Sale or Jose Quintana? Certainly, but in a thin market where the prospect cost of starters is likely to be exorbitant, the team may also stay the course. " https://www.bostonglobe.com/sports/redsox/2...fLwI/story.html At least he knows the price.

QUOTE (raBBit @ Oct 11, 2016 -> 01:07 PM) The italicized isn't a thing. Unless you're a star on a s***ty team you just play within yourself. I am not sure why JBJ would be subjected to some immense amount of pressure on a team where the barriers to be of the best are low and the amount of people watching are of the least. I think he moreso meant that JBJ wouldn't have nearly as much protection in the WS lineup. In Boston's lineup, he was sort of an after thought and probably saw a lot of great pitches. That wouldn't be the case with the Sox, especially if Melky and Todd are moved in a larger rebuild.

QUOTE (raBBit @ Oct 11, 2016 -> 12:40 PM) I don't think the Red Sox would move both JBJ and Benintendi. I know you've said the same earlier in the thread, but I don't think a rental of Melky really changes anything. JBJ and Benintendi are both franchise CFers. The BoSox could move one, but moving both would take a huge strength and turn it into a huge hole. Neither Melky Cabrera or Brock Holt will make a difference in that regard. I do think a lot of posters on this board are underrating JBJ. I know we're trading the best asset the White Sox have ever had in this hypothetical and people want better than JBJ as a headliner, but JBJ is a .340-.360 OBP guy with 20+ dingers and great defense. Other than depth of the roster, our problem is the lack of power/OBP/defense. JBJ does all of those things at a premium position. At home, he can really take away the gaps. Seeing what Lorenzo Cain does when KC come to town, it would be incredible to have our own guy forcing teams to hit the long ball to win. Especially with Eaton in RF. I think Kopech is the guy the Sox would insist on including. He'd be the next ace prospect in the system hopefully to replace Sale in a few years. He had some makeup concerns coming out of the draft and has since been suspended for stims and suspended for fighting with a teammate. That adds another layer of risk on a 20 year old who throws 100+. He is filthy though. Despite a clear need to stop tipping his off-speed pitches, Kopech absolutely dominated A+ as a 20 year old. He stays tall and closed on the fastball but has a bad habit of dropping down and slowing down on the offspeed offerings. From my largely untrained eye, his mechanics would check out with the Sox. So to me, one of JBJ/Benintendi is a must. Kopech is a must. One of Swihart/Vazquez makes too much sense. If it's JBJ, we need Moncada too. If it's Bentinendi, the last four pieces are higher quality guys than the last three on Moncada/JBJ starter. If we could somehow get Moncada/JBJ that would be incredible. My deals in order of preference and least likelihood: 1.) Moncada, JBJ, Kopech, Swihart/Vazquez and Eduardo Rodriguez/Brian Johnson. 2.) Benintendi, Kopech, Devers, Swihart/Vazquez and Eduardo Rodriguez/Brian Johnson 3.) JBJ, Kopech, Devers, Swihart/Vazquez and Luis Alexander Basabe Nice post. I would be livid with that third trade. Sox need to do better than that.

QUOTE (JUSTgottaBELIEVE @ Oct 11, 2016 -> 11:56 AM) I said it 6 weeks ago that I would be PISSED if JBJ was the centerpiece of a Sale deal. He has bust written all over him if he ended up on the south side (from an offensive standpoint). Centerpeice - meaning we don't get Moncada/Devers or Benintendi/Devers, I would agree. If JBJ is in the deal with Benintendi and Devers, or Moncada and Devers, I am cool with it. His OF defense in CF and keeping Eaton in RF would be phenominal. An OF of Benintendi / JBJ / Eaton would be one of the best, if not the best, defensively in MLB.

QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Oct 11, 2016 -> 09:44 AM) Re: The Red Sox, I can see them trading one of their OF, I can't see them trading both Benetiendi AND JBJ, unless they think Moncada (and obviously isn't in the deal) is ready to play out there today. If they trade both, they create a hole out there. They already have a large hole to fill in Ortiz. I think the White Sox would be able to get one of Ben and JBJ for a deal to make sense for both sides. Personally I could see the White Sox settling around JBJ, Moncada, and a couple of pitchers. Koepech is obviously a guy who will get their attention, plus a guy like Groome can be dealt after the World Series as well. If not you could sub a guy like Devers for one of the pitchers. I assume that the Red Sox wouldn't WANT to trade both JBJ and Benintendi, but they do have Holt who can play the OF everyday. Plus they could sign a Reddick or Cespedes, or could get a Melky back in a bigger trade involving Sale. Sale and Melky JBJ, Benintendi, Devers, Kopech and Rodriguez

QUOTE (gatnom @ Oct 11, 2016 -> 07:41 AM) I agree that they would trade him for Sale. I just don't think you're going to get a mega package with a guy like Benintendi or Moncada coming with. The reality is that if you really wanted to do a full tear down, you could flip him to another team for a nice load of prospects by himself, making him a good centerpiece regardless. The Sox are going to want at least 1-2 ML ready or young MLB players for Sale. They're not trading him for 5-6 prospects in the traditional sense.

QUOTE (StrangeSox @ Oct 10, 2016 -> 03:07 PM) Yeah but that's bulls*** and highlighting that goes right to the Democrats position on taxes I don't disagree - but its the way the law currently works. Not using the benefits that the tax laws provide just to be a "nice guy" and pay more taxes than you actually have to would be asinine. The man's job has always been to maximize returns on his investments for himself and his partners/investors. Paying more taxes for funsies would go directly against that. Again, Trump is an asshat. But the fact that he LEGALLY used the US tax code to avoid paying personal income tax shouldn't be used again him. There are plenty of other things to rag on him about - but the fact that Hilary keeps going back to this, to me, seems like she doesn't understand it.

QUOTE (Soxbadger @ Oct 10, 2016 -> 03:00 PM) Huh? Without huge losses how would he not pay income tax? Warren Buffet paid: http://www.forbes.com/sites/kellyphillipse...2/#1d9dac00491d Do you think that Warren Buffet doesn't follow basic accounting laws? Ugh. Warren Buffet is not a real estate developer.

QUOTE (JenksIsMyHero @ Oct 10, 2016 -> 03:00 PM) If Trump wasn't such a moron he could easily respond to that whole issue by pointing out that every major donor for Hillary has a company that "legally" dodges BILLIONS in taxes every year. He did that last night.

QUOTE (bigruss22 @ Oct 10, 2016 -> 02:56 PM) There is nothing basic about our tax laws, especially those that somehow allow millionaires to pay so much less than they should have paid. It actually is pretty basic. Like I said, no real estate developers of any size pay personal income tax. What he is doing is the same as every other person who owns significant amount of commercial real estate.

QUOTE (Steve9347 @ Oct 10, 2016 -> 02:54 PM) But that's just it. Had the clown simply released his tax returns and used this as a reason to defend his "brilliant businessman" storyline, he'd be set. There's dirty s*** in there, so he won't do that. He could have shut down that argument (to which Hillary would have simply adjusted to talking about how losing $916,000,000 in one year is f***ed up). But, since he's a moron, he gloats in the worst way possible and looks even more like the horse's ass he already resembles. a) he didn't actually lose $1B in one year. Again, tax laws. b) I don't know if something dirty is in there or not, but when you own as much real estate as Donald owns, and presumably he will go back to that business when he loses this election, releasing his tax returns probably isn't in the best interest of his real estate operation. c) His whole "brilliant businessman" line is equally as stupid. You don't become a billionaire without being a pretty fiscally intelligent person, but him not paying income taxes has nothing to do with his fiscal brilliance. Its the law.

QUOTE (Dick Allen @ Oct 10, 2016 -> 02:45 PM) Right, but that is part of the game. Trump can either take what Hillary is saying, or admit he was such a genius businessman, and under his direction making deals, all the US will ever do is win, and win so much we all will be sick of winning, he didn't have to pay federal taxes for almost 20 years because he lost so much money making great deals. The large loss carryforwards from the casino business not withstanding, Trump wouldn't have paid a dime in person income taxes anyway. That's not because he doesn't make a ton of money, its because his accountants follow basic accounting laws. There are a bunch of reasons to hate and/or dislike Trump - the lack of paying income taxes isn't one of them. The whole thing is stupid.

QUOTE (KyYlE23 @ Oct 10, 2016 -> 02:10 PM) To me the presumption(?) that he didnt pay taxes isnt really the big deal here. The fact that he didnt pay taxes because his businesses bottomed out so royally that he doesnt have to pay taxes is the big deal, because he is being sold as SUCCESSFUL AND EXTREMELY WEALTHY BUSINESSMAN DONALD TRUMP many people have avoided taxes because of bankruptcy, not many have avoided taxes that long because of a bankrupty of that amount of money Sure, but that's not really the way Hilary portrays it. She moreso portrays it that he didn't help the country for all those years (last night she even listed off all the things tax dollars are used for - schools, military, infrastructure, etc.) because he didn't pay taxes. Loss carryforwards are a basic accounting practice; basically all real estate developers that have any significant holdings don't pay personal income tax. It's not exactly rocket science. Amortization and depreciation are non-cash expenses that lower the taxable net income of individual real estate holdings. When you own as many real estate assets as Trump owns, these numbers are quite significant. The fact that he took advantage of those tax laws (as all wealthy Americans should do), isn't exactly damning. It's sort of bewildering that Hilary keep focusing on it - its almost like she doesn't get it. What I don't get is why Donald doesn't just take a few minutes to explain this step by step in a debate. The fact that Trump ventured into the casino business and failed, which is the source of the lionshare of the ~$1B in loss carryforwards in 1995 should definitely be viewed as a negative, but the fact that he took that failure and used a basic tax law to shelter income for the foreseeable future is something that any person in that situation would do.

QUOTE (StrangeSox @ Oct 10, 2016 -> 06:46 AM) Trump also seemed to confirm that he didn't by federal income taxes for at least 20 years. Plus he had his own Aleppo moment when he was asked about what would happen if the city fell. Just curious - would you pay taxes that you didn't have to pay?