QUOTE (The Ultimate Champion @ Dec 26, 2013 -> 08:55 AM)
No reason?
When's the last time the Sox spent an average of around $20M+ per season on anyone?
When's the last time the Sox went 5+ years on a free agent pitcher, in fact, when is the last time they've gone 7 years?
Every single offseason there are #3 quality starters with the stuff to dominate a game on the market, and usually there are guys you can sign for 4 years or less. Also there are always types with a bit more upside looking to rebuild value, ala Josh Johnson this year.
Further, we have an organization that specializes in picking pitching out of other organizations/off the scrap heap and turning it into something worthwhile.
Lastly, the strength of or organization is pitching, the weakness is everything else.
There are plenty of reasons not to piss away a huge chunk of payroll space and potentially several seasons of offseason flexibility on a guy who has never pitched in MLB & who probably isn't even an ace anyway.
Should the Sox offer a $20M bid plus a 6 year, $75M salary? Maybe, that's a lot and still pretty risky. But that's not going to get it done. The Sox would be forced to bid against angry, aggressive stupidity to "win" by assuming what is probably going to be the biggest on-paper financial risk of the offseason. No thanks.
This.... Sox are trying to go young AND cheap to save up for when this team is ready and add the final pieces through FA. I doubt in a couple years we'll be a #3 projected $140-50 mil SP away from a WS title, no reason for them to bind themselves right now.