Sleepy Harold

Hendriks said he thought he could be back in May, Lance scoffed at that in the podcast interview and threw June out there. We know Liam is super competitive, but i think it would still make sense to place him on the 60.

We're changing the ball once again, this time it'll be a bean bag except for Yankee games.

I had to read this a few times to make sure it wasn't the Not Bob account.

It showed up for me on the main page of the app, just had to scroll over a couple times on the Live & Upcoming Sports thing at the top.

They're a top 5 system right now, if not higher, so that checks out.

I don't often go on Tuesday but would be more inclined to do so with this. About time they did this. Tuesday vs the Cubs is exempt from this BTW.

Outside of nearly tripping on his own feet on his first attempt (still made the out) I think it went alright for the first time ever playing the position.

I'm intrigued

That's fair, I'd like to think that he wouldn't be long for Birmingham.

I was also a bit surprised, but maybe they're just building the chemistry between the future double play combo.

I never understood why some would choose not to protect their nuggets.

Birmingham should have a fun offense to follow this year. That infield of Ramos, Colson, and Popeye (Mieses probably at 1B too) is going to be ?.

Here's the broadcast angle

https://www.mlb.com/padres/video/live-padres-spring-training-46197 here's the webcast in case anyone wanted to watch

TBH it would've been one of the few things I would've been in Tony's corner for.

A fantastic question that I wish I had an answer to.

Once again, you are. For some reason, you're still choosing to ignore the word "harmful" in the definition of conspiracy. Something harmful does NOT need to be unlawful. For those of us that still value literary comprehension, one could argue that the White Sox choosing not to promote an outfielder that was playing extremely well while the major league roster was in dire need of someone that was healthy and could (hopefully) provide a boost offensively was "harmful" to the major league club. Since the non-promotion can be deemed as "harmful" in this case to the prospect of the major league clubs success, it would therefore validate my totally 100% super cereal conspiracy theory claim.