Jump to content

Hamhock

Members
  • Posts

    118
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Hamhock

  1. On 1/7/2023 at 11:11 AM, Texsox said:

    Find an owner without ties to the city that will finally move them to a city where they can be #1 instead of in another team's shadow.

    I have no dog in this fight, but of all US cities/metro areas without an MLB team, there are zero with a population greater than half of Chicago’s. (San Antonio has a city population a little over half, but its MSA is 1/4 the size)

    • Like 1
  2. 1 hour ago, ThirdGen said:

    Moses was a major problem for them, but neither team was doing well financially at the time either.  No doubt NY could support two teams, the market is much larger than Chicago. Three teams was probably a stretch, particularly sharing a market with the Yankees in the 1950's.

    Just for additional insight, here's attendance from 1948-1957 for all three clubs (not refuting what you're saying; just thought it might be interesting to look at the trend):

    Giants:
    1948    1,459,269
    1949    1,218,446
    1950    1,008,878
    1951    1,059,539 (Pennant)
    1952    984,940
    1953    811,518
    1954    1,155,067 (WS)
    1955    824,112
    1956    629,179
    1957    653,923

    Dodgers:
    1948    1,398,967
    1949    1,633,747 (Pennant)
    1950    1,185,896
    1951    1,282,628 (84 home games)
    1952    1,088,704 (Pennant)
    1953    1,163,419 (Pennant)
    1954    1,020,531
    1955    1,033,589 (WS)
    1956    1,213,562 (Pennant)
    1957    1,028,258

    Yankees:
    1948    2,373,901
    1949    2,283,676 (WS)
    1950    2,081,380 (WS)
    1951    1,950,107 (WS)
    1952    1,629,665 (WS)
    1953    1,537,811 (WS)
    1954    1,475,171
    1955    1,490,138 (Pennant)
    1956    1,491,784 (WS)
    1957    1,497,134 (Pennant)

  3. 23 minutes ago, The Kids Can Play said:

    I hear what you're saying, but the Silver Slugger is just one per position. The Gold Glove is mostly defense and also just one. My point was I think there should be 3 All-Pro teams at the end of the season for each position like in the NBA and NFL. Just my opinion!

    This already exists; it’s just that it only began in 2019, so it’s going to take several more years to gather status/renown:

    https://www.mlb.com/awards/all-mlb

  4. Regardless of who is the official beer sponsor, there are always one or two places in the stadium to find other labels. For instance, you could get Miller Lite last season, just not at every vendor. I'm sure Revolution will be available somewhere in the stadium, just not as many offerings and with the dedicated area.

  5. 3 hours ago, Sarava said:

    I agree with him on the draft issue. And it's not just baseball, as we see it in other sports. A couple years ago there was that slogan 'Lose for Hughes' in the NHL, which was about teams jockeying for position to potentially draft Jack Hughes with the #1 overall pick.

    The solution is so simple, randomize draft order among all teams that missed the playoffs. The best team to miss the playoffs would have the same odds as the worst team in the league. And not just for the top 2 or 3 picks, do it for all of them. The worst team could pick first, or they could pick 14th.

    I saw a draft wheel concept somewhere (the old Grantland site, maybe?) which put all 30 teams in a shuffled order (1, 30, 16, 9… you get the idea) which was then followed to the next number in the sequence year-by-year regardless of your record; in other words, you get the #1 pick once every 30 years, and then you pick last the next year, and then you pick 16th the next year, etc., etc. Each team gets a top 5 pick every 6 years, 2 top 10 picks every 12 years, and so on.

  6. There's a ripple effect beyond the games being played, whether it's selling tickets (difficult to do without a guarantee that there will be a season, or when it'll start), Spring Training locale gameday staffing, MLB stadium gameday staffing, marketing plans (you can't feature players in imagery without an agreement in place); etc. Uncertainty creates more uncertainty.

    • Like 1
  7. As someone who has worked at a business that involved sending lots of emails to large lists of people, I would like to mention some general caveats about the sending and receiving of emails:

    • Not every email sent out by "Company X" gets successfully delivered into a person's inbox
      • Sometimes it gets filtered out by a user's ISP, even if earlier emails were successfully delivered
      • Or it bounces as undeliverable, for whatever reason - if that occurs, this email address may be filtered out from receiving further emails from Company X, so that Company X doesn't get penalized for violating anti-spam laws.
      • Or a Gmail user gets tired of seeing the emails show up in their inbox, and instead of setting up a filter/subfolder for them, hits "Report Spam" to send these emails to their Spam folder - this gets tracked as an "Unsubscribe", and the user is filtered out from receiving further emails
    • Even if it does get successfully delivered, not everyone sees it or opens it
      • Open rates for emails run between 10% - 60% of total emails delivered.
        • Fewer still click on the emails once opened.

    In short - if you haven't received something, and you're a Season Ticket Holder, reach out to your rep.

  8. 38 minutes ago, harkness99 said:

    here is what the team should do in response - Everyone in the dugout and on the field just laugh hysterically.

    In these situations,  I want a team to proactively wear a temporary target patch (with "AIM HERE" lettering on it) on the side of their sleeve or jersey/pants as a passive-aggressive approach. Every HBP results in a team celebration from the dugout; it would drive the other side crazy within an inning.

    • Haha 1
  9. 3 hours ago, SoxBlanco said:

    Are you and others really taking his comment seriously?  It was an obvious joke, and I'm assuming it was made to poke fun at the whiners/complainers.

    Speaking only for my own reply, I thought initially it was serious because it matched the determined-to-be-unhappy tone that can be seen in others here.

    I subsequently appreciate the boss-level sarcasm and have taken the lumps in stride. Learning experience!

    • Love 1
  10. 11 minutes ago, 35thstreetswarm said:

    Every team the Sox have beaten has a worse record than they do. I’m unimpressed.

    As the Sox currently have the highest winning percentage in MLB, it would be quite impossible to have played someone with a better record than them.

    • Haha 2
    • Fire 3
  11. 1 hour ago, Green Line said:

    Do the Sox compensate the fans for parking etc if this happens?

    Yes; from the announcement:

    ”Season-ticket holders will receive a credit to their account for game tickets and parking for tonight’s game. Ticketmaster purchasers will receive a full refund for game tickets and parking through Ticketmaster.”

×
×
  • Create New...