Jump to content

Exclusive interview with Nick Hostetler - review of the 2016 draft


NorthSideSox72

Recommended Posts

QUOTE (NorthSideSox72 @ Jul 11, 2016 -> 08:22 AM)
Our Brian got an exclusive 1-on-1 interview with Scouting Director Nick Hostetler, to do a sort of post-op review of the 2016 draft for the White Sox. There is some good insight in here, in fact a couple surprises as well.

 

Here's the interview article.

 

This is really good stuff.

Excellent interview and write up!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (TheTruth05 @ Jul 11, 2016 -> 09:33 AM)
You weren't kidding, awesome article. Nick didn't pull any punches, he seems confident in their process and honestly great to hear about going for good OBP,fundamental hitters and overall ballplayers. Nice work

 

Yeah, the bits of detail on the players, plus the comments about the lies told to cover up who a team is chasing was all great stuff. Dude is a great interview.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's nice to know they're not intent on rushing Collins like it appears they're read to do with some of the pitchers (as relievers).

 

The main problem is that 2017 is setting up as their final "all in" year...and the market for catching is looking pretty bleak for the moment, so we're back to "band aid/dumpster diving" solutions again.

 

Nothing we can do about it, but it would be awesome to have him for the second half of 2017...and maybe that still happens. It would be like pulling off a trade, just like injecting Tim Anderson into the line-up has been this year.

 

Looking at the future, you have a core of Anderson, Abreu, Eaton and Collins. But that still leaves five potential holes for 2018 in LF, CF, 3B, 2B (that's easier to imagine Saladino/Sanchez filling) and DH. I also don't realistically think Saladino can play 3rd, Sanchez 2B and still have enough power (been there, done that)...but somehow we need to come up with at least two more power bats (corner outfield/DH/another infielder at either 2B/3B with pop). Hard to project Engel/Trey/May as future starters right now.

 

At any rate, getting a 750-800 OPS out of Collins will help a lot. And maybe, JUST MAYBE, Hahn finds one big bat in July/August this year...but this has to be the biggest concern for Sox fans when they look at 2017, 2018 and on into the future. Doesn't even have to be LH power (shout out to Lillian), but just any legit power/OBP combo.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (caulfield12 @ Jul 11, 2016 -> 11:38 AM)
It's nice to know they're not intent on rushing Collins like it appears they're read to do with some of the pitchers (as relievers).

 

The main problem is that 2017 is setting up as their final "all in" year...and the market for catching is looking pretty bleak for the moment, so we're back to "band aid/dumpster diving" solutions again.

 

Nothing we can do about it, but it would be awesome to have him for the second half of 2017...and maybe that still happens. It would be like pulling off a trade, just like injecting Tim Anderson into the line-up has been this year.

 

Looking at the future, you have a core of Anderson, Abreu, Eaton and Collins. But that still leaves five potential holes for 2018 in LF, CF, 3B, 2B (that's easier to imagine Saladino/Sanchez filling) and DH. I also don't realistically think Saladino can play 3rd, Sanchez 2B and still have enough power (been there, done that)...but somehow we need to come up with at least two more power bats (corner outfield/DH/another infielder at either 2B/3B with pop). Hard to project Engel/Trey/May as future starters right now.

 

At any rate, getting a 750-800 OPS out of Collins will help a lot. And maybe, JUST MAYBE, Hahn finds one big bat in July/August this year...but this has to be the biggest concern for Sox fans when they look at 2017, 2018 and on into the future. Doesn't even have to be LH power (shout out to Lillian), but just any legit power/OBP combo.

 

 

2017 doesn't have to be their all in year though. Sale, Q, Rodon, and Fulmer are all locked up. Abreu, Anderson, and Eaton are all signed. I would not be stunned if the Sox signed Lawrie and Frazier to extensions honestly. They'd need to fill C, CF, and DH but they need to do that anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fwiw, KW was talking a LOT about OBP five years ago...and certainly in reaction to Moneyball, but it was just that, lots of talk.

 

The irony is that the one "athletic/toolsy" guy who could actually take some walks (Thompson) was traded away. We drafted Mitchell (who actually wasn't too bad in this area, either) and Hawkins...and Tim Anderson's troubles with drawing walks are well-documented. Signed Viciedo, etc.

 

So yeah, pretty strange we KNEW there was an OBVIOUS problem, yet it took 10+ years after trading for Thome (OBP machine) to finally do something about it.

 

Finally, clear direction emerged...after all this time.

Edited by caulfield12
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who was the last really refined collegiate hitter we took?

 

Beckham and Jeremy Reed are the only names that come to mind. Borchard and Fields were more pieces of work in progress, toolsy/athletic getting by with natural athletic ability against lower levels of competition. Same thing with Brian Anderson.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Hatchetman @ Jul 11, 2016 -> 04:27 PM)
Good job on the interview.

 

So, my question is...even casual fans have known the importance of OBP for like 15 years. Why are the Sox just focusing on those guys now?

It's not that the Sox or any other front office don't understand the importance. It's a question of how indicative college performance in that area is, of how they'll do as a pro. It's not as simple as, players who get on base a lot in college or high school will do so in the minors or majors. That's where some debate between physical tools and baseball skills comes into play.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Great article, very informative. The one guy whom I'm interested to see how things turn out with is Alec Hansen, who wasn't mentioned in this particular interview. I thought he was a terrific pick with obvious tremendous upside. If he returns to form and lives up to the hype that had him going as a potential 1-1 at one point, look out! He could be a difference maker somewhere down the road.

Edited by Thad Bosley
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1. (10) Zack Collins C 1 for 11, 7 K

1. (26) Zach Burdi RHP 9 ERA, 1.86 WHIP, 7 IP, 4 BB, 7 K

2. (49) Alec Hansen RHP 0.00 ERA, 0.71 WHIP, 7 IP, 4 BB, 11 K

3. (86) Alex Call OF .315/.465/.472 in 89 AB 18:15 BB:K

4. (116) Jameson Fisher OF .342/.435/.521 in 73 AB

5. (146) Jimmy Lambert RHP 3.38 ERA, 0.88 WHIP, 8 IP, 2 BB, 13 K

6. (176) Luis Curbelo SS .226/.349/.396 in 53 AB

7. (206) Bernardo Flores LHP 0.90 ERA, 0.90 WHIP, 10 IP, 0 BB, 8 K

8. (236) Nate Nolan C .167/.262/.259 in 54 AB

9. (266) Max Dutto SS .220/.381/.260 in 50 AB

10.(296) Zach Remillard 3B N/A

11 (326): Ian Hamilton RHP 3.86 ERA, 1.29 WHIP, 7 IP, 4 BB, 8 K

 

Pretty good start for the top of the draft so far. Will be watching a lot of these guys closely.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Y2JImmy0 @ Jul 13, 2016 -> 01:04 PM)
How did they whiff on Kyle Lewis?

I'm saying I'm a little worried that we'll look back and think that should've been the pick at 10. It was the pick most were screaming for and he's been killing it since being drafted. That said I'm happy with the general approach that resulted in the Collins pick and hopefully he makes any worrying look silly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...