daggins Posted August 1, 2016 Share Posted August 1, 2016 No one is moving because they are going for it in 2017. That was always the direction. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
footlongcomiskeydog Posted August 1, 2016 Share Posted August 1, 2016 QUOTE (EvilJester99 @ Aug 1, 2016 -> 02:45 PM) KW and company probably feel a move or two and they can compete once again... They most certainly feel this way. There would have been some movement at the deadline if they felt otherwise. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T R U Posted August 1, 2016 Share Posted August 1, 2016 QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Aug 1, 2016 -> 02:33 PM) To me, getting young guys that are already proven makes a of sense. You still get some cost control, and you lose some of the uncertainty of turning into the next Brien Taylor. To be perfectly honest, I would be just fine if they said Moncada, Benintendi, and Devers for Sale. Done Deal. Obviously, I don't know the specifics of the discussions, but if were dicking around with lottery ticket A Ball players being added im just dumbfounded by it. That's 3 of the top 23 prospects in baseball, 2 of which are performing at a high level in Double A. That's MORE than enough for Chris Sale. This will more than likely be an unpopular take on the proposed Sale packages Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Palehosefan Posted August 1, 2016 Share Posted August 1, 2016 The problem with keeping Sale and Quintana is that they keep you afloat and likely finish around .500, ensuring a mediocre draft pick, and a little less value for each in the offseason. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soxfest Posted August 1, 2016 Share Posted August 1, 2016 QUOTE (Condor13 @ Aug 1, 2016 -> 02:47 PM) Been saying it for a long time, unless KW gets a washed up star the sox don't make any trades. Sox talk a big game at the deadline but do very little ever. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SCCWS Posted August 1, 2016 Share Posted August 1, 2016 QUOTE (ChiSox59 @ Aug 1, 2016 -> 03:37 PM) I don't think you move Melky and Frazier, 2 of your 3 best offensive pieces, if you keep Sale and Q. Same could be said for Robertson. So you are all in for 2016???.......................... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiSox59 Posted August 1, 2016 Share Posted August 1, 2016 QUOTE (TRU @ Aug 1, 2016 -> 02:48 PM) To be perfectly honest, I would be just fine if they said Moncada, Benintendi, and Devers for Sale. Done Deal. Obviously, I don't know the specifics of the discussions, but if were dicking around with lottery ticket A Ball players being added im just dumbfounded by it. That's 3 of the top 23 prospects in baseball, 2 of which are performing at a high level in Double A. That's MORE than enough for Chris Sale. This will more than likely be an unpopular take on the proposed Sale packages There has been exactly ZERO indication that the Bo Sox would be Moncada for anyone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kevo880 Posted August 1, 2016 Share Posted August 1, 2016 QUOTE (TRU @ Aug 1, 2016 -> 01:48 PM) To be perfectly honest, I would be just fine if they said Moncada, Benintendi, and Devers for Sale. Done Deal. Obviously, I don't know the specifics of the discussions, but if were dicking around with lottery ticket A Ball players being added im just dumbfounded by it. That's 3 of the top 23 prospects in baseball, 2 of which are performing at a high level in Double A. That's MORE than enough for Chris Sale. This will more than likely be an unpopular take on the proposed Sale packages It's unpopular because you are hung up on the wrong thing. The Sale trade isn't happening because they won't include both Moncada and Benintendi...not because they will include both but we want throw ins... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Black_Jack29 Posted August 1, 2016 Share Posted August 1, 2016 QUOTE (TRU @ Aug 1, 2016 -> 02:48 PM) To be perfectly honest, I would be just fine if they said Moncada, Benintendi, and Devers for Sale. Done Deal. Obviously, I don't know the specifics of the discussions, but if were dicking around with lottery ticket A Ball players being added im just dumbfounded by it. That's 3 of the top 23 prospects in baseball, 2 of which are performing at a high level in Double A. That's MORE than enough for Chris Sale. This will more than likely be an unpopular take on the proposed Sale packages I might want one more lower-level prospect, but I might be convinced to do that deal as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chisoxfn Posted August 1, 2016 Author Share Posted August 1, 2016 QUOTE (TRU @ Aug 1, 2016 -> 12:48 PM) To be perfectly honest, I would be just fine if they said Moncada, Benintendi, and Devers for Sale. Done Deal. Obviously, I don't know the specifics of the discussions, but if were dicking around with lottery ticket A Ball players being added im just dumbfounded by it. That's 3 of the top 23 prospects in baseball, 2 of which are performing at a high level in Double A. That's MORE than enough for Chris Sale. This will more than likely be an unpopular take on the proposed Sale packages I would agree, if we had those three in a deal, I'm game. I'd ask for more, but I'd be in general, okay. I'd probably sweeten it with Robertson to add Swihart to the package and call it a day (would push for more, but would settle at that). I just don't know if Boston has / would offer. None of us will ever really know (unless the trade happens). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jose Abreu Posted August 1, 2016 Share Posted August 1, 2016 Brinson and Ortiz for Lucroy. No Sale trade for them now Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted August 1, 2016 Share Posted August 1, 2016 QUOTE (TRU @ Aug 1, 2016 -> 02:48 PM) To be perfectly honest, I would be just fine if they said Moncada, Benintendi, and Devers for Sale. Done Deal. Obviously, I don't know the specifics of the discussions, but if were dicking around with lottery ticket A Ball players being added im just dumbfounded by it. That's 3 of the top 23 prospects in baseball, 2 of which are performing at a high level in Double A. That's MORE than enough for Chris Sale. This will more than likely be an unpopular take on the proposed Sale packages They also aren't offering Moncada, and might not even be offering Benintendi. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shipps Posted August 1, 2016 Share Posted August 1, 2016 QUOTE (TRU @ Aug 1, 2016 -> 02:48 PM) To be perfectly honest, I would be just fine if they said Moncada, Benintendi, and Devers for Sale. Done Deal. Obviously, I don't know the specifics of the discussions, but if were dicking around with lottery ticket A Ball players being added im just dumbfounded by it. That's 3 of the top 23 prospects in baseball, 2 of which are performing at a high level in Double A. That's MORE than enough for Chris Sale. This will more than likely be an unpopular take on the proposed Sale packages Totally agree with that. Then you trade Q to the Dodgers for Urias +1. Is that for sure equal to talent? No you may get burned but you will also likely have a better team next year and a better future for years to come if those guys pan out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Donny Lucy's Avocado Farm Posted August 1, 2016 Share Posted August 1, 2016 Its all good guys.... Your official 2016 White Sox Trade Deadline jersey - now available on chisox.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OmarComing25 Posted August 1, 2016 Share Posted August 1, 2016 QUOTE (TRU @ Aug 1, 2016 -> 02:48 PM) To be perfectly honest, I would be just fine if they said Moncada, Benintendi, and Devers for Sale. Done Deal. Obviously, I don't know the specifics of the discussions, but if were dicking around with lottery ticket A Ball players being added im just dumbfounded by it. That's 3 of the top 23 prospects in baseball, 2 of which are performing at a high level in Double A. That's MORE than enough for Chris Sale. This will more than likely be an unpopular take on the proposed Sale packages I really believe that if Boston had offered that, Hahn would have pulled the trigger. Even without Devers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bighurt574 Posted August 1, 2016 Share Posted August 1, 2016 It would be fascinating to know what's been offered, and what we've asked. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
heirdog Posted August 1, 2016 Share Posted August 1, 2016 QUOTE (Jose Abreu @ Aug 1, 2016 -> 02:51 PM) Brinson and Ortiz for Lucroy. No Sale trade for them now actually that keeps Gallo in play Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve9347 Posted August 1, 2016 Share Posted August 1, 2016 sigh They have like 10 guys who should be dealt and moved 1 of them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
footlongcomiskeydog Posted August 1, 2016 Share Posted August 1, 2016 QUOTE (Jose Abreu @ Aug 1, 2016 -> 02:51 PM) Brinson and Ortiz for Lucroy. No Sale trade for them now I don't think Sale was ever really on the market. They have no plans to ever trade the King of the K zone! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Condor13 Posted August 1, 2016 Share Posted August 1, 2016 4 min till the sox take a giant s*** on their fans yet again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mattchoo Posted August 1, 2016 Share Posted August 1, 2016 QUOTE (Steve9347 @ Aug 1, 2016 -> 02:54 PM) sigh They have like 10 guys who should be dealt and moved 1 of them. This. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chicago White Sox Posted August 1, 2016 Share Posted August 1, 2016 This is f***ing ridiculous. Absolutely unacceptable to not move any of Robertson, Shields, Gonzalez, Melky, & Frazier. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
harfman77 Posted August 1, 2016 Share Posted August 1, 2016 QUOTE (heirdog @ Aug 1, 2016 -> 02:54 PM) actually that keeps Gallo in play The Sox need nothing to do with Gallo. Without Ortiz, the Rangers are out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiSoxFanMike Posted August 1, 2016 Share Posted August 1, 2016 The Sox f***ed up another opportunity. It's getting real hard to support this team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Sacamano Posted August 1, 2016 Share Posted August 1, 2016 We don't know what they were offered guys. Get off the ledge. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts