Ducksnort Posted July 26, 2016 Share Posted July 26, 2016 http://m.whitesox.mlb.com/news/article/191...o-to-face-cubs/ This is a good move by the Sox. Ranaudo deserves this shot. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlackSox13 Posted July 26, 2016 Share Posted July 26, 2016 QUOTE (Scoots @ Jul 26, 2016 -> 06:42 AM) http://m.whitesox.mlb.com/news/article/191...o-to-face-cubs/ This is a good move by the Sox. Ranaudo deserves this shot. Absolutely agree. Who knows, the Sox might need him to fill a spot in the rotation if a team ponies up for Sale or Q. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Swingandalongonetoleft Posted July 26, 2016 Share Posted July 26, 2016 Hope they forget the bats at home. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ptatc Posted July 26, 2016 Share Posted July 26, 2016 QUOTE (raBBit @ Jul 26, 2016 -> 09:37 AM) Ranaudo will have to clear waivers to stay with the Sox. The timing of this lends credence to the idea that the Sox will move a SP. Notice how when they were in it, they called up Turner, who was less deserving. Once they fell apart, Ranaudo got his shot. Sounds logical. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Sacamano Posted July 26, 2016 Share Posted July 26, 2016 QUOTE (raBBit @ Jul 26, 2016 -> 09:37 AM) Ranaudo will have to clear waivers to stay with the Sox. The timing of this lends credence to the idea that the Sox will move a SP. Notice how when they were in it, they called up Turner, who was less deserving. Once they fell apart, Ranaudo got his shot. Do you know something is on the horizon by chance? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lasttriptotulsa Posted July 26, 2016 Share Posted July 26, 2016 QUOTE (raBBit @ Jul 26, 2016 -> 09:37 AM) Ranaudo will have to clear waivers to stay with the Sox. The timing of this lends credence to the idea that the Sox will move a SP. Notice how when they were in it, they called up Turner, who was less deserving. Once they fell apart, Ranaudo got his shot. Why would Ranaudo have to clear waivers? He was already optioned this year before. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Sacamano Posted July 26, 2016 Share Posted July 26, 2016 QUOTE (raBBit @ Jul 26, 2016 -> 09:49 AM) Nothing pertaining to Gonzalez specifically. That was just my line of thinking all things considered. Sorry. I didn't mean him specifically but just any news I suppose. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Sacamano Posted July 26, 2016 Share Posted July 26, 2016 QUOTE (raBBit @ Jul 26, 2016 -> 10:01 AM) I am not 100% sure, but I don't think this is the case. I think you are correct. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lasttriptotulsa Posted July 26, 2016 Share Posted July 26, 2016 QUOTE (raBBit @ Jul 26, 2016 -> 10:01 AM) I am not 100% sure, but I don't think this is the case. Remember the Sox acquired him via trade from the Rangers, he wasn't released. If he were out of options the Rangers wouldn't have been able to send him down earlier this year nor would the Sox when they traded for him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OmarComing25 Posted July 26, 2016 Share Posted July 26, 2016 Not a lot of strikeouts, but after all the control issues he's had, just 8 walks in 78.2 innings at Charlotte is nice to see. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EvilJester99 Posted July 26, 2016 Share Posted July 26, 2016 I hope the move would be a bit bigger than Gonzalez.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Sacamano Posted July 26, 2016 Share Posted July 26, 2016 QUOTE (lasttriptotulsa @ Jul 26, 2016 -> 10:03 AM) Remember the Sox acquired him via trade from the Rangers, he wasn't released. If he were out of options the Rangers wouldn't have been able to send him down earlier this year nor would the Sox when they traded for him. I think he was on waivers though when we traded for him. I think it's similar when players are claimed on waivers and able to go to the minors with the new team. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lasttriptotulsa Posted July 26, 2016 Share Posted July 26, 2016 (edited) QUOTE (soxfan2014 @ Jul 26, 2016 -> 10:09 AM) I think he was on waivers though when we traded for him. I think it's similar when players are claimed on waivers and able to go to the minors with the new team. If he was out of options and on waivers the Sox wouldn't have had to give anything up for him. He would have just been claimed and awarded to the team highest up on the list. MLBTR did not have him on the list of players out of options this spring. http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2016/03/out-...tions-2016.html Edited July 26, 2016 by lasttriptotulsa Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kalapse Posted July 26, 2016 Share Posted July 26, 2016 Ranaudo can be sent down and recalled at will this year, he was optioned in '14, '15 and '16 so this is his final option year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiSox59 Posted July 26, 2016 Share Posted July 26, 2016 QUOTE (Kalapse @ Jul 26, 2016 -> 10:25 AM) Ranaudo can be sent down and recalled at will this year, he was optioned in '14, '15 and '16 so this is his final option year. Correct. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoxAce Posted July 26, 2016 Share Posted July 26, 2016 QUOTE (Kalapse @ Jul 26, 2016 -> 10:25 AM) Ranaudo can be sent down and recalled at will this year, he was optioned in '14, '15 and '16 so this is his final option year. Kal comes out of the woodwork. Nice. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaliSoxFanViaSWside Posted July 27, 2016 Share Posted July 27, 2016 QUOTE (Kalapse @ Jul 26, 2016 -> 08:25 AM) Ranaudo can be sent down and recalled at will this year, he was optioned in '14, '15 and '16 so this is his final option year. It's Turner who would have to be released or waived or whatever if they decide to take him off the 25. That's why I was wondering why the heck they didn't just bring up Ranaudo in the 1st place over Turner. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SCCWS Posted July 27, 2016 Share Posted July 27, 2016 Saw Ranaudo pitch a few weeks ago against Red Sox AAA and he was outstanding that game. Boston I think it was a 3 hit shutout over 8 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dunt Posted July 27, 2016 Share Posted July 27, 2016 Still kinda of surprised the Sox didnt give Fulmer a chance to spot start and haven't really used him out of the pen at all. Hope Ranaudo can keep it going, but not getting my hopes up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ptatc Posted July 27, 2016 Share Posted July 27, 2016 QUOTE (Dunt @ Jul 27, 2016 -> 07:30 AM) Still kinda of surprised the Sox didnt give Fulmer a chance to spot start and haven't really used him out of the pen at all. Hope Ranaudo can keep it going, but not getting my hopes up. They need to control his number of innings. He would be in the bullpen in the minors if not in the mlb. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dick Allen Posted July 27, 2016 Share Posted July 27, 2016 If he isn't sharp, I'm guess Fulmer will take the mound tonight. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheTruth05 Posted July 27, 2016 Share Posted July 27, 2016 QUOTE (Dick Allen @ Jul 27, 2016 -> 08:08 AM) If he isn't sharp, I'm guess Fulmer will take the mound tonight. Win-Win. Either Ranaudo looks good and make shields expendable at the right time or Fulmer comes in and gets some valuable game time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hatchetman Posted July 27, 2016 Share Posted July 27, 2016 Ranaudo gave up 12 bombs in 78 innings in Charlotte which is a lot frightening vs. Cubs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RockRaines Posted July 27, 2016 Share Posted July 27, 2016 QUOTE (Hatchetman @ Jul 27, 2016 -> 10:44 AM) Ranaudo gave up 12 bombs in 78 innings in Charlotte which is a lot frightening vs. Cubs. Depends where the wind is coming from. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
he gone. Posted July 27, 2016 Share Posted July 27, 2016 I was totally on board and gung-ho on the Raunado bandwagon going into tonight (relatively speaking for a midseason pickup in AAA). I thought his main problem was walks and that if he had figured it out in AAA that he could actually be a similar piece to Erik Johnson - meaning, all goes well maybe a #5 candidate next year. But the HR line scares me. Take it FWIW that Charlotte's stadium is tiny, but still, that is not very good. Means although not walking people he probably still is missing his spot. Something you can maybe pitch around a bit at AAA, but not in the majors. This could be bad, especially against the Cubs. Give me 6 innings of 4 run ball. A couple mistakes for HR's and I am fine tonight. After that, I'd say bounce Turner, keep Raunado and put him in the long relief role. (once Rodon comes back) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.