greg775 Posted September 25, 2016 Share Posted September 25, 2016 North Korea to me seems to be the place that starts the next huge mess. North Korea has threatened to wipe out Seoul with a nuke. If the North Korean leader feels like he's about to be over-run and assassinated I could definitely see him wanting to go out of this world in a blaze of glory, i.e. lob a nuke or two at South Korea. What happens environmentally after that, with fallout of a nuke being detonated in a major city, as well as the response of others could trigger the end of the world as we know it. What if the USA then blows North Korea off the map so to speak in an act of war vs. N. Korea? Then are both N and S Korea inhabitable? Does China get involved and blow up some U.S. city in Hawaii? I just see North Korea's leader being the guy who gets the ball rolling on mass destruction eventually. he's going to feel like somebody in North Korea wants to over-run him and he's going to, before he gets assassinated, do some major destruction. Do you at least agree with me that Kim Jong-Un is gonna be the guy who before he dies fires a nuke a S. Korea or the USA? I think HE WILL. http://www.cnn.com/videos/world/2016/09/23...ncocks-lklv.cnn Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reddy Posted September 25, 2016 Share Posted September 25, 2016 QUOTE (greg775 @ Sep 25, 2016 -> 03:21 PM) North Korea to me seems to be the place that starts the next huge mess. North Korea has threatened to wipe out Seoul with a nuke. If the North Korean leader feels like he's about to be over-run and assassinated I could definitely see him wanting to go out of this world in a blaze of glory, i.e. lob a nuke or two at South Korea. What happens environmentally after that, with fallout of a nuke being detonated in a major city, as well as the response of others could trigger the end of the world as we know it. What if the USA then blows North Korea off the map so to speak in an act of war vs. N. Korea? Then are both N and S Korea inhabitable? Does China get involved and blow up some U.S. city in Hawaii? I just see North Korea's leader being the guy who gets the ball rolling on mass destruction eventually. he's going to feel like somebody in North Korea wants to over-run him and he's going to, before he gets assassinated, do some major destruction. Do you at least agree with me that Kim Jong-Un is gonna be the guy who before he dies fires a nuke a S. Korea or the USA? I think HE WILL. http://www.cnn.com/videos/world/2016/09/23...ncocks-lklv.cnn Nope. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
greg775 Posted September 25, 2016 Author Share Posted September 25, 2016 QUOTE (Reddy @ Sep 25, 2016 -> 08:24 PM) Nope. What does he have to lose? Why not bring nukes into the equation if you are N. Korea's leader? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reddy Posted September 25, 2016 Share Posted September 25, 2016 QUOTE (greg775 @ Sep 25, 2016 -> 03:28 PM) What does he have to lose? Why not bring nukes into the equation if you are N. Korea's leader? Is there anything you're not afraid of? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kyyle23 Posted September 25, 2016 Share Posted September 25, 2016 QUOTE (Reddy @ Sep 25, 2016 -> 02:30 PM) Is there anything you're not afraid of? Polling everyone at the local Applebee's Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
greg775 Posted September 26, 2016 Author Share Posted September 26, 2016 (edited) QUOTE (Reddy @ Sep 25, 2016 -> 08:30 PM) Is there anything you're not afraid of? I'm not afraid, I'm just making observations and my observation is N. Korea WILL start a nuclear incident. Whether it's a nuclear war or not, who knows. If they toss a nuke at Seoul and it kills millions and screws up the environment I'd think we'd blow North Korea off the map. Then it's up to China and Russia if they want to get involved and fire up a nuke or two at us. So this is serious business. Kim Jong-Un is not to be trusted. The second he senses he's about to be assassinated, why wouldn't he make sure S. Korea has a nuke or two to deal with as his legacy? Edited September 26, 2016 by greg775 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
juddling Posted September 26, 2016 Share Posted September 26, 2016 QUOTE (greg775 @ Sep 25, 2016 -> 02:21 PM) North Korea to me seems to be the place that starts the next huge mess. North Korea has threatened to wipe out Seoul with a nuke. If the North Korean leader feels like he's about to be over-run and assassinated I could definitely see him wanting to go out of this world in a blaze of glory, i.e. lob a nuke or two at South Korea. What happens environmentally after that, with fallout of a nuke being detonated in a major city, as well as the response of others could trigger the end of the world as we know it. What if the USA then blows North Korea off the map so to speak in an act of war vs. N. Korea? Then are both N and S Korea inhabitable? Does China get involved and blow up some U.S. city in Hawaii? I just see North Korea's leader being the guy who gets the ball rolling on mass destruction eventually. he's going to feel like somebody in North Korea wants to over-run him and he's going to, before he gets assassinated, do some major destruction. Do you at least agree with me that Kim Jong-Un is gonna be the guy who before he dies fires a nuke a S. Korea or the USA? I think HE WILL. http://www.cnn.com/videos/world/2016/09/23...ncocks-lklv.cnn While i don't think NK will start WWIII, i will say that if i had to bet on anyone starting it.....it would be them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quin Posted September 26, 2016 Share Posted September 26, 2016 Greg, you're the one that has basically been advocating starting WW3 with North Korea. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Hurtin Posted September 26, 2016 Share Posted September 26, 2016 QUOTE (juddling @ Sep 26, 2016 -> 12:17 AM) While i don't think NK will start WWIII, i will say that if i had to bet on anyone starting it.....it would be them. I don't know, I think the American and Chinese influence in each country would prevent it. If I was betting on such a thing, the nuclear war would start between India and Pakistan. Just talking about nukes in general, I think it will be one of the west African nations with a dirty bomb. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CanOfCorn Posted September 28, 2016 Share Posted September 28, 2016 Here's the thing Greg, I get what you are saying, but men in power only want one thing. Power. If there's no North Korea, there's no power. He is "showing his power" by conducting these tests and pushing the boundaries. His best ally is the us vs. the World scenario. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
greg775 Posted September 29, 2016 Author Share Posted September 29, 2016 QUOTE (CanOfCorn @ Sep 28, 2016 -> 09:25 PM) Here's the thing Greg, I get what you are saying, but men in power only want one thing. Power. If there's no North Korea, there's no power. He is "showing his power" by conducting these tests and pushing the boundaries. His best ally is the us vs. the World scenario. Yes but what about my scenario. Let's say he's told his power is about to be gone. There are N. Koreans outside his mansion and they ARE going to kill him. Doesn't he wanna go down in the history books as the guy who nuked Seoul and started the end of the world? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CanOfCorn Posted September 29, 2016 Share Posted September 29, 2016 QUOTE (greg775 @ Sep 28, 2016 -> 11:17 PM) Yes but what about my scenario. Let's say he's told his power is about to be gone. There are N. Koreans outside his mansion and they ARE going to kill him. Doesn't he wanna go down in the history books as the guy who nuked Seoul and started the end of the world? His power is ALWAYS about to be gone. That's the deal. He knows it. That's why he keeps his country in the dark, literally. The other thing people in power are is paranoid. You don't think he's paranoid? Or delusional? He is both. And he hasn't done it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
2nd_city_saint787 Posted October 13, 2016 Share Posted October 13, 2016 While we are talking crazy here.....All this Putin stuff floating around is hogwash right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
greg775 Posted October 13, 2016 Author Share Posted October 13, 2016 QUOTE (scs787 @ Oct 13, 2016 -> 01:18 AM) While we are talking crazy here.....All this Putin stuff floating around is hogwash right? I just read an article that some Russian higher-up says if Clinton is elected there will be nuclear war sooner rather than later. Interesting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CanOfCorn Posted October 20, 2016 Share Posted October 20, 2016 QUOTE (greg775 @ Oct 12, 2016 -> 11:45 PM) I just read an article that some Russian higher-up says if Clinton is elected there will be nuclear war sooner rather than later. Interesting. We should just start it now and get it over with. Putin may be a dictator and evil, but he isn't stupid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StrangeSox Posted October 20, 2016 Share Posted October 20, 2016 That guy is apparently a bats*** crazy guy who's always rattling sabers and Putin keeps him around to appease the right-wing nationalists in his own country. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
greg775 Posted October 23, 2016 Author Share Posted October 23, 2016 It's been quiet in North Korea lately. Wonder what he's up to? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts